Freegold Ventures Limited (FVL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Freegold Ventures Limited (FVL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-124.11K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.03 Million) in one year. Explore Freegold Ventures Limited long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Freegold Ventures Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Freegold Ventures Limited across 29 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Freegold Ventures Limited for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Freegold Ventures Limited (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Freegold Ventures Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FVL market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.80x | CA$-825.48K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2024 | -1.19x | CA$-798.42K | CA$671.46K | ▼ -86134.7% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | CA$-907.29 | CA$657.98K | ▲ +99.8% |
| 2022 | -0.87x | CA$-803.39K | CA$926.87K | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2021 | -0.70x | CA$-647.01K | CA$928.75K | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2020 | -2.55x | CA$-2.02 Million | CA$792.34K | ▼ -146388.2% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | CA$-2.38K | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2018 | -0.37x | CA$-395.44K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2017 | -0.75x | CA$-661.43K | CA$885.13K | ▼ -144.0% |
| 2016 | -0.31x | CA$-454.85K | CA$1.49 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2015 | -0.25x | CA$-421.82K | CA$1.66 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2014 | -0.63x | CA$-770.79K | CA$1.23 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2013 | -1.50x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2012 | -1.70x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$1.12 Million | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2011 | -1.58x | CA$-2.67 Million | CA$1.69 Million | ▼ -556.6% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | CA$-645.13K | CA$2.69 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2009 | -0.23x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$5.83 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2008 | -0.29x | CA$-2.49 Million | CA$8.57 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2007 | -4.26x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$428.29K | ▼ -420.4% |
| 2006 | -0.82x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$1.34 Million | ▼ -123.8% |
| 2005 | 3.44x | CA$366.73K | CA$106.46K | ▲ +206.8% |
| 2004 | -3.23x | CA$-745.66K | CA$231.06K | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2003 | -20.26x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$94.08K | ▼ -441.5% |
| 2002 | -3.74x | CA$-295.07K | CA$78.86K | ▼ -576.1% |
| 2001 | -0.55x | CA$-98.17K | CA$177.39K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2000 | -3.66x | CA$-266.13K | CA$72.72K | ▲ +59.3% |
| 1998 | -9.00x | CA$-584.91K | CA$64.99K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1997 | -3.00x | CA$-628.93K | CA$209.64K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1996 | -1.00x | CA$-364.86K | CA$364.86K | — |