Freegold Ventures Limited (FVL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Freegold Ventures Limited (FVL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-124.11K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.03 Million) in one year. See FVL FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Freegold Ventures Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Freegold Ventures Limited across 29 annual periods. Also explore Freegold Ventures Limited annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Freegold Ventures Limited (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Freegold Ventures Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FVL company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.80x | CA$-825.48K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2024 | -1.19x | CA$-798.42K | CA$671.46K | ▼ -86134.7% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | CA$-907.29 | CA$657.98K | ▲ +99.8% |
| 2022 | -0.87x | CA$-803.39K | CA$926.87K | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2021 | -0.70x | CA$-647.01K | CA$928.75K | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2020 | -2.55x | CA$-2.02 Million | CA$792.34K | ▼ -146388.2% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | CA$-2.38K | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2018 | -0.37x | CA$-395.44K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2017 | -0.75x | CA$-661.43K | CA$885.13K | ▼ -144.0% |
| 2016 | -0.31x | CA$-454.85K | CA$1.49 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2015 | -0.25x | CA$-421.82K | CA$1.66 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2014 | -0.63x | CA$-770.79K | CA$1.23 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2013 | -1.50x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2012 | -1.70x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$1.12 Million | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2011 | -1.58x | CA$-2.67 Million | CA$1.69 Million | ▼ -556.6% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | CA$-645.13K | CA$2.69 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2009 | -0.23x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$5.83 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2008 | -0.29x | CA$-2.49 Million | CA$8.57 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2007 | -4.26x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$428.29K | ▼ -420.4% |
| 2006 | -0.82x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$1.34 Million | ▼ -123.8% |
| 2005 | 3.44x | CA$366.73K | CA$106.46K | ▲ +206.8% |
| 2004 | -3.23x | CA$-745.66K | CA$231.06K | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2003 | -20.26x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$94.08K | ▼ -441.5% |
| 2002 | -3.74x | CA$-295.07K | CA$78.86K | ▼ -576.1% |
| 2001 | -0.55x | CA$-98.17K | CA$177.39K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2000 | -3.66x | CA$-266.13K | CA$72.72K | ▲ +59.3% |
| 1998 | -9.00x | CA$-584.91K | CA$64.99K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1997 | -3.00x | CA$-628.93K | CA$209.64K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1996 | -1.00x | CA$-364.86K | CA$364.86K | — |