Guardian Capital Group Limited (GCG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Guardian Capital Group Limited (GCG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$68.38 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$748.64 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Guardian Capital Group Limited to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Guardian Capital Group Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Guardian Capital Group Limited across 29 annual periods. Also explore Guardian Capital Group Limited (GCG) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Guardian Capital Group Limited (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Guardian Capital Group Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GCG market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.15x | CA$93.26 Million | CA$635.41 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$81.42 Million | CA$490.07 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$81.23 Million | CA$581.91 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | CA$102.86 Million | CA$576.10 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | CA$71.79 Million | CA$435.86 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | CA$49.11 Million | CA$435.76 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | CA$47.14 Million | CA$376.89 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | CA$44.64 Million | CA$271.28 Million | ▲ +53.6% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | CA$42.52 Million | CA$396.79 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | CA$33.78 Million | CA$301.72 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | CA$38.08 Million | CA$244.52 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | CA$30.67 Million | CA$227.27 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | CA$23.90 Million | CA$153.00 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | CA$21.20 Million | CA$142.50 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | CA$16.99 Million | CA$134.36 Million | ▲ +45.2% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | CA$10.53 Million | CA$120.92 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | CA$11.24 Million | CA$105.83 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | CA$18.92 Million | CA$107.90 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | CA$13.47 Million | CA$84.83 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$20.70 Million | CA$80.05 Million | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | CA$12.17 Million | CA$75.24 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | CA$8.01 Million | CA$75.19 Million | ▲ +158.6% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | CA$3.23 Million | CA$78.28 Million | ▼ -46.5% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | CA$7.97 Million | CA$103.43 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | CA$15.16 Million | CA$75.55 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | CA$14.80 Million | CA$64.80 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 1998 | 0.18x | CA$11.50 Million | CA$62.70 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | CA$6.90 Million | CA$43.80 Million | ▲ +133.0% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | CA$2.40 Million | CA$35.50 Million | — |