Guardian Capital Group Limited (GCG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Guardian Capital Group Limited (GCG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$68.38 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$748.64 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Guardian Capital Group Limited to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Guardian Capital Group Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Guardian Capital Group Limited across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GCG cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Guardian Capital Group Limited (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Guardian Capital Group Limited. Check Guardian Capital Group Limited (GCG) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.15x | CA$93.26 Million | CA$635.41 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$81.42 Million | CA$490.07 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$81.23 Million | CA$581.91 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | CA$102.86 Million | CA$576.10 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | CA$71.79 Million | CA$435.86 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | CA$49.11 Million | CA$435.76 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | CA$47.14 Million | CA$376.89 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | CA$44.64 Million | CA$271.28 Million | ▲ +53.6% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | CA$42.52 Million | CA$396.79 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | CA$33.78 Million | CA$301.72 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | CA$38.08 Million | CA$244.52 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | CA$30.67 Million | CA$227.27 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | CA$23.90 Million | CA$153.00 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | CA$21.20 Million | CA$142.50 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | CA$16.99 Million | CA$134.36 Million | ▲ +45.2% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | CA$10.53 Million | CA$120.92 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | CA$11.24 Million | CA$105.83 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | CA$18.92 Million | CA$107.90 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | CA$13.47 Million | CA$84.83 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$20.70 Million | CA$80.05 Million | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | CA$12.17 Million | CA$75.24 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | CA$8.01 Million | CA$75.19 Million | ▲ +158.6% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | CA$3.23 Million | CA$78.28 Million | ▼ -46.5% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | CA$7.97 Million | CA$103.43 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | CA$15.16 Million | CA$75.55 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | CA$14.80 Million | CA$64.80 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 1998 | 0.18x | CA$11.50 Million | CA$62.70 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | CA$6.90 Million | CA$43.80 Million | ▲ +133.0% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | CA$2.40 Million | CA$35.50 Million | — |