Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-274.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.07 Billion) in one year. Check GIL cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gildan Activewear Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gildan Activewear Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Gildan Activewear Inc. total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gildan Activewear Inc. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gildan Activewear Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GIL market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | CA$585.54 Million | CA$6.89 Billion | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$501.39 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2023 | 0.35x | CA$546.61 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | CA$413.49 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2021 | 0.51x | CA$617.51 Million | CA$1.22 Billion | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | CA$415.03 Million | CA$1.46 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | CA$361.03 Million | CA$1.38 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2018 | 0.50x | CA$538.54 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2017 | 0.66x | CA$613.36 Million | CA$929.33 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2016 | 0.62x | CA$537.90 Million | CA$870.50 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | CA$219.81 Million | CA$782.14 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | CA$264.10 Million | CA$569.51 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2013 | 1.32x | CA$427.16 Million | CA$324.23 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2012 | 0.47x | CA$219.58 Million | CA$470.10 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | CA$181.55 Million | CA$550.84 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2010 | 1.54x | CA$301.55 Million | CA$195.71 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2009 | 1.03x | CA$169.18 Million | CA$164.35 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2008 | 0.85x | CA$238.90 Million | CA$282.63 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | CA$91.16 Million | CA$203.90 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0.51x | CA$94.81 Million | CA$187.24 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | CA$93.15 Million | CA$171.38 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2004 | 0.37x | CA$58.86 Million | CA$161.25 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2003 | 0.41x | CA$66.66 Million | CA$163.87 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2002 | 0.79x | CA$112.22 Million | CA$142.86 Million | ▲ +1817.0% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | CA$-7.83 Million | CA$171.09 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | CA$26.81 Million | CA$131.29 Million | ▲ +164.2% |
| 1999 | -0.32x | CA$-31.57 Million | CA$99.32 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1998 | -0.21x | CA$-11.23 Million | CA$52.23 Million | ▼ -101.8% |
| 1997 | -0.11x | CA$-3.60 Million | CA$33.79 Million | — |