Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-274.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.07 Billion) in one year. See Gildan Activewear Inc. leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gildan Activewear Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gildan Activewear Inc. across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Gildan Activewear Inc. generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gildan Activewear Inc. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gildan Activewear Inc.. Check earnings quality score of Gildan Activewear Inc. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | CA$585.54 Million | CA$6.89 Billion | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$501.39 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2023 | 0.35x | CA$546.61 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | CA$413.49 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2021 | 0.51x | CA$617.51 Million | CA$1.22 Billion | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | CA$415.03 Million | CA$1.46 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | CA$361.03 Million | CA$1.38 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2018 | 0.50x | CA$538.54 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2017 | 0.66x | CA$613.36 Million | CA$929.33 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2016 | 0.62x | CA$537.90 Million | CA$870.50 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | CA$219.81 Million | CA$782.14 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | CA$264.10 Million | CA$569.51 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2013 | 1.32x | CA$427.16 Million | CA$324.23 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2012 | 0.47x | CA$219.58 Million | CA$470.10 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | CA$181.55 Million | CA$550.84 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2010 | 1.54x | CA$301.55 Million | CA$195.71 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2009 | 1.03x | CA$169.18 Million | CA$164.35 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2008 | 0.85x | CA$238.90 Million | CA$282.63 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | CA$91.16 Million | CA$203.90 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0.51x | CA$94.81 Million | CA$187.24 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | CA$93.15 Million | CA$171.38 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2004 | 0.37x | CA$58.86 Million | CA$161.25 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2003 | 0.41x | CA$66.66 Million | CA$163.87 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2002 | 0.79x | CA$112.22 Million | CA$142.86 Million | ▲ +1817.0% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | CA$-7.83 Million | CA$171.09 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | CA$26.81 Million | CA$131.29 Million | ▲ +164.2% |
| 1999 | -0.32x | CA$-31.57 Million | CA$99.32 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1998 | -0.21x | CA$-11.23 Million | CA$52.23 Million | ▼ -101.8% |
| 1997 | -0.11x | CA$-3.60 Million | CA$33.79 Million | — |