Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-274.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.07 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Gildan Activewear Inc. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gildan Activewear Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gildan Activewear Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore GIL net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gildan Activewear Inc. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gildan Activewear Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Gildan Activewear Inc. market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | CA$585.54 Million | CA$6.89 Billion | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$501.39 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2023 | 0.35x | CA$546.61 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | CA$413.49 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2021 | 0.51x | CA$617.51 Million | CA$1.22 Billion | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | CA$415.03 Million | CA$1.46 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | CA$361.03 Million | CA$1.38 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2018 | 0.50x | CA$538.54 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2017 | 0.66x | CA$613.36 Million | CA$929.33 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2016 | 0.62x | CA$537.90 Million | CA$870.50 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | CA$219.81 Million | CA$782.14 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | CA$264.10 Million | CA$569.51 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2013 | 1.32x | CA$427.16 Million | CA$324.23 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2012 | 0.47x | CA$219.58 Million | CA$470.10 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | CA$181.55 Million | CA$550.84 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2010 | 1.54x | CA$301.55 Million | CA$195.71 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2009 | 1.03x | CA$169.18 Million | CA$164.35 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2008 | 0.85x | CA$238.90 Million | CA$282.63 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | CA$91.16 Million | CA$203.90 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0.51x | CA$94.81 Million | CA$187.24 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | CA$93.15 Million | CA$171.38 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2004 | 0.37x | CA$58.86 Million | CA$161.25 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2003 | 0.41x | CA$66.66 Million | CA$163.87 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2002 | 0.79x | CA$112.22 Million | CA$142.86 Million | ▲ +1817.0% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | CA$-7.83 Million | CA$171.09 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | CA$26.81 Million | CA$131.29 Million | ▲ +164.2% |
| 1999 | -0.32x | CA$-31.57 Million | CA$99.32 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1998 | -0.21x | CA$-11.23 Million | CA$52.23 Million | ▼ -101.8% |
| 1997 | -0.11x | CA$-3.60 Million | CA$33.79 Million | — |