Gildan Activewear Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gildan Activewear Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-274.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.07 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Gildan Activewear Inc. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Gildan Activewear Inc. (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Gildan Activewear Inc. from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Gildan Activewear Inc. across 29 annual periods. Check GIL cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Gildan Activewear Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Gildan Activewear Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gildan Activewear Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Gildan Activewear Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | CA$585.54 Million | CA$6.89 Billion | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$501.39 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2023 | 0.35x | CA$546.61 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | CA$413.49 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2021 | 0.51x | CA$617.51 Million | CA$1.22 Billion | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | CA$415.03 Million | CA$1.46 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | CA$361.03 Million | CA$1.38 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2018 | 0.50x | CA$538.54 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2017 | 0.66x | CA$613.36 Million | CA$929.33 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2016 | 0.62x | CA$537.90 Million | CA$870.50 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | CA$219.81 Million | CA$782.14 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | CA$264.10 Million | CA$569.51 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2013 | 1.32x | CA$427.16 Million | CA$324.23 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2012 | 0.47x | CA$219.58 Million | CA$470.10 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | CA$181.55 Million | CA$550.84 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2010 | 1.54x | CA$301.55 Million | CA$195.71 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2009 | 1.03x | CA$169.18 Million | CA$164.35 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2008 | 0.85x | CA$238.90 Million | CA$282.63 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | CA$91.16 Million | CA$203.90 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0.51x | CA$94.81 Million | CA$187.24 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | CA$93.15 Million | CA$171.38 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2004 | 0.37x | CA$58.86 Million | CA$161.25 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2003 | 0.41x | CA$66.66 Million | CA$163.87 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2002 | 0.79x | CA$112.22 Million | CA$142.86 Million | ▲ +1817.0% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | CA$-7.83 Million | CA$171.09 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | CA$26.81 Million | CA$131.29 Million | ▲ +164.2% |
| 1999 | -0.32x | CA$-31.57 Million | CA$99.32 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1998 | -0.21x | CA$-11.23 Million | CA$52.23 Million | ▼ -101.8% |
| 1997 | -0.11x | CA$-3.60 Million | CA$33.79 Million | — |