Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (GMX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (GMX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -8.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.09 Million could theoretically repay -8% of its total liabilities (CA$132.21K) in one year. Explore how much of Globex Mining Enterprises Inc.'s assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Globex Mining Enterprises Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.93x | CA$2.49 Million | CA$848.51K | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2023 | 13.25x | CA$2.27 Million | CA$171.40K | ▲ +191.6% |
| 2022 | -14.46x | CA$-3.04 Million | CA$209.83K | ▼ -597.5% |
| 2021 | 2.91x | CA$7.59 Million | CA$2.61 Million | ▲ +497.3% |
| 2020 | 0.49x | CA$559.87K | CA$1.15 Million | ▲ +139.2% |
| 2019 | -1.24x | CA$-1.45 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -213.3% |
| 2018 | -0.40x | CA$-518.19K | CA$1.31 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-565.98K | CA$1.25 Million | ▼ -150.4% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | CA$-417.60K | CA$2.31 Million | ▼ -320.7% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | CA$173.27K | CA$2.12 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | CA$-282.62K | CA$2.40 Million | ▼ -3424.1% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | CA$18.09K | CA$5.10 Million | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2012 | -0.13x | CA$-836.88K | CA$6.44 Million | ▼ -1131.5% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$60.08K | CA$4.77 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2010 | -0.26x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$4.16 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | CA$-993.10K | CA$3.30 Million | ▼ -206.8% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | CA$1.14 Million | CA$4.05 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | CA$343.73K | CA$1.68 Million | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2006 | 4.53x | CA$807.98K | CA$178.25K | ▲ +176.5% |
| 2005 | 1.64x | CA$199.37K | CA$121.61K | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2004 | 2.75x | CA$389.95K | CA$141.65K | ▲ +131.7% |
| 2003 | -8.68x | CA$-471.56K | CA$54.32K | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2002 | -5.11x | CA$-175.91K | CA$34.41K | ▼ -419.4% |
| 2001 | -0.98x | CA$-256.69K | CA$260.78K | ▼ -314.8% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | CA$140.14K | CA$305.77K | ▲ +129.2% |
| 1999 | -1.57x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$700.00K | ▲ +98.5% |
| 1998 | -107.00x | CA$-21.40 Million | CA$200.00K | ▼ -14345.0% |
| 1997 | -0.74x | CA$-2.00 Million | CA$2.70 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 1996 | 9.00x | CA$900.00K | CA$100.00K | — |