Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (GMX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (GMX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -8.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.09 Million could theoretically repay -8% of its total liabilities (CA$132.21K) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore GMX net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Globex Mining Enterprises Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GMX market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.93x | CA$2.49 Million | CA$848.51K | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2023 | 13.25x | CA$2.27 Million | CA$171.40K | ▲ +191.6% |
| 2022 | -14.46x | CA$-3.04 Million | CA$209.83K | ▼ -597.5% |
| 2021 | 2.91x | CA$7.59 Million | CA$2.61 Million | ▲ +497.3% |
| 2020 | 0.49x | CA$559.87K | CA$1.15 Million | ▲ +139.2% |
| 2019 | -1.24x | CA$-1.45 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -213.3% |
| 2018 | -0.40x | CA$-518.19K | CA$1.31 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-565.98K | CA$1.25 Million | ▼ -150.4% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | CA$-417.60K | CA$2.31 Million | ▼ -320.7% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | CA$173.27K | CA$2.12 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | CA$-282.62K | CA$2.40 Million | ▼ -3424.1% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | CA$18.09K | CA$5.10 Million | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2012 | -0.13x | CA$-836.88K | CA$6.44 Million | ▼ -1131.5% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$60.08K | CA$4.77 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2010 | -0.26x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$4.16 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | CA$-993.10K | CA$3.30 Million | ▼ -206.8% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | CA$1.14 Million | CA$4.05 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | CA$343.73K | CA$1.68 Million | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2006 | 4.53x | CA$807.98K | CA$178.25K | ▲ +176.5% |
| 2005 | 1.64x | CA$199.37K | CA$121.61K | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2004 | 2.75x | CA$389.95K | CA$141.65K | ▲ +131.7% |
| 2003 | -8.68x | CA$-471.56K | CA$54.32K | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2002 | -5.11x | CA$-175.91K | CA$34.41K | ▼ -419.4% |
| 2001 | -0.98x | CA$-256.69K | CA$260.78K | ▼ -314.8% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | CA$140.14K | CA$305.77K | ▲ +129.2% |
| 1999 | -1.57x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$700.00K | ▲ +98.5% |
| 1998 | -107.00x | CA$-21.40 Million | CA$200.00K | ▼ -14345.0% |
| 1997 | -0.74x | CA$-2.00 Million | CA$2.70 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 1996 | 9.00x | CA$900.00K | CA$100.00K | — |