Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (GMX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -8.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.09 Million could theoretically repay -8% of its total liabilities (CA$132.21K) in one year. Check Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. across 29 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Globex Mining Enterprises Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.93x | CA$2.49 Million | CA$848.51K | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2023 | 13.25x | CA$2.27 Million | CA$171.40K | ▲ +191.6% |
| 2022 | -14.46x | CA$-3.04 Million | CA$209.83K | ▼ -597.5% |
| 2021 | 2.91x | CA$7.59 Million | CA$2.61 Million | ▲ +497.3% |
| 2020 | 0.49x | CA$559.87K | CA$1.15 Million | ▲ +139.2% |
| 2019 | -1.24x | CA$-1.45 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -213.3% |
| 2018 | -0.40x | CA$-518.19K | CA$1.31 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-565.98K | CA$1.25 Million | ▼ -150.4% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | CA$-417.60K | CA$2.31 Million | ▼ -320.7% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | CA$173.27K | CA$2.12 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | CA$-282.62K | CA$2.40 Million | ▼ -3424.1% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | CA$18.09K | CA$5.10 Million | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2012 | -0.13x | CA$-836.88K | CA$6.44 Million | ▼ -1131.5% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$60.08K | CA$4.77 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 2010 | -0.26x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$4.16 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | CA$-993.10K | CA$3.30 Million | ▼ -206.8% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | CA$1.14 Million | CA$4.05 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | CA$343.73K | CA$1.68 Million | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2006 | 4.53x | CA$807.98K | CA$178.25K | ▲ +176.5% |
| 2005 | 1.64x | CA$199.37K | CA$121.61K | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2004 | 2.75x | CA$389.95K | CA$141.65K | ▲ +131.7% |
| 2003 | -8.68x | CA$-471.56K | CA$54.32K | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2002 | -5.11x | CA$-175.91K | CA$34.41K | ▼ -419.4% |
| 2001 | -0.98x | CA$-256.69K | CA$260.78K | ▼ -314.8% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | CA$140.14K | CA$305.77K | ▲ +129.2% |
| 1999 | -1.57x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$700.00K | ▲ +98.5% |
| 1998 | -107.00x | CA$-21.40 Million | CA$200.00K | ▼ -14345.0% |
| 1997 | -0.74x | CA$-2.00 Million | CA$2.70 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 1996 | 9.00x | CA$900.00K | CA$100.00K | — |