Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (KMP-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (KMP-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$30.37 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.48 Billion) in one year. Explore Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment (KMP-UN) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust across 26 annual periods. Also explore Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$145.94 Million | CA$2.44 Billion | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | CA$160.14 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$139.73 Million | CA$2.60 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | CA$125.33 Million | CA$2.59 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$140.86 Million | CA$2.47 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | CA$123.51 Million | CA$2.01 Billion | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$95.21 Million | CA$1.78 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | CA$89.74 Million | CA$1.66 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | CA$82.92 Million | CA$1.34 Billion | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$64.01 Million | CA$1.24 Billion | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | CA$50.95 Million | CA$1.19 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | CA$51.52 Million | CA$1.11 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | CA$39.08 Million | CA$928.37 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | CA$46.03 Million | CA$854.69 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | CA$39.29 Million | CA$816.99 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | CA$33.28 Million | CA$641.22 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | CA$26.23 Million | CA$562.17 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | CA$22.36 Million | CA$565.48 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | CA$18.41 Million | CA$529.80 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$10.28 Million | CA$480.72 Million | ▼ -46.3% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | CA$14.92 Million | CA$374.67 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | CA$5.93 Million | CA$164.87 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | CA$1.21 Million | CA$45.57 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | CA$406.83K | CA$11.61 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2001 | -28.51x | CA$-347.62K | CA$12.19K | ▼ -5549.3% |
| 2000 | 0.52x | CA$12.13K | CA$23.18K | — |