Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (KMP-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (KMP-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$23.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.54 Billion) in one year. See KMP-UN FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KMP-UN cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust. Check KMP-UN cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$145.94 Million | CA$2.44 Billion | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | CA$160.14 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$139.73 Million | CA$2.60 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | CA$125.33 Million | CA$2.59 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$140.86 Million | CA$2.47 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | CA$123.51 Million | CA$2.01 Billion | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$95.21 Million | CA$1.78 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | CA$89.74 Million | CA$1.66 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | CA$82.92 Million | CA$1.34 Billion | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$64.01 Million | CA$1.24 Billion | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | CA$50.95 Million | CA$1.19 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | CA$51.52 Million | CA$1.11 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | CA$39.08 Million | CA$928.37 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | CA$46.03 Million | CA$854.69 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | CA$39.29 Million | CA$816.99 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | CA$33.28 Million | CA$641.22 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | CA$26.23 Million | CA$562.17 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | CA$22.36 Million | CA$565.48 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | CA$18.41 Million | CA$529.80 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$10.28 Million | CA$480.72 Million | ▼ -46.3% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | CA$14.92 Million | CA$374.67 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | CA$5.93 Million | CA$164.87 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | CA$1.21 Million | CA$45.57 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | CA$406.83K | CA$11.61 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2001 | -28.51x | CA$-347.62K | CA$12.19K | ▼ -5549.3% |
| 2000 | 0.52x | CA$12.13K | CA$23.18K | — |