Lundin Gold Inc (LUG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lundin Gold Inc (LUG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.64x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$201.52 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$316.25 Million) in one year. See Lundin Gold Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lundin Gold Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lundin Gold Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore Lundin Gold Inc (LUG) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lundin Gold Inc (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lundin Gold Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LUG market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.13x | CA$662.39 Million | CA$311.18 Million | ▲ +110.0% |
| 2023 | 1.01x | CA$519.39 Million | CA$512.40 Million | ▲ +94.3% |
| 2022 | 0.52x | CA$426.14 Million | CA$816.78 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2021 | 0.48x | CA$417.75 Million | CA$870.64 Million | ▲ +287.8% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$113.64 Million | CA$918.50 Million | ▲ +647.1% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | CA$-21.31 Million | CA$942.14 Million | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2018 | -0.08x | CA$-32.13 Million | CA$414.42 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2017 | -0.12x | CA$-28.48 Million | CA$246.88 Million | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2016 | -6.26x | CA$-57.39 Million | CA$9.16 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2015 | -6.63x | CA$-43.24 Million | CA$6.52 Million | ▼ -3596.8% |
| 2014 | -0.18x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$6.46 Million | ▲ +91.1% |
| 2013 | -2.02x | CA$-141.18K | CA$69.96K | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2012 | -8.36x | CA$-276.13K | CA$33.03K | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2011 | -32.79x | CA$-967.65K | CA$29.51K | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2010 | -40.32x | CA$-4.22 Million | CA$104.67K | ▼ -290.4% |
| 2009 | -10.33x | CA$-6.47 Million | CA$626.43K | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2008 | -38.37x | CA$-14.16 Million | CA$369.12K | ▼ -256.9% |
| 2007 | -10.75x | CA$-11.26 Million | CA$1.05 Million | ▼ -778.5% |
| 2006 | -1.22x | CA$-792.57K | CA$647.67K | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2005 | -7.29x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$166.05K | ▼ -301.4% |
| 2004 | -1.82x | CA$-900.10K | CA$495.68K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2003 | -1.59x | CA$-132.88K | CA$83.69K | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2002 | -7.25x | CA$-387.35K | CA$53.39K | ▼ -490.7% |
| 2001 | 1.86x | CA$89.05K | CA$47.95K | ▲ +140.6% |
| 2000 | -4.58x | CA$-92.47K | CA$20.21K | ▼ -8741.2% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | CA$-4.86K | CA$93.88K | ▲ +99.3% |
| 1998 | -7.45x | CA$-138.90K | CA$18.65K | — |