Lundin Gold Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lundin Gold Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lundin Gold Inc (LUG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.64x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$201.52 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$316.25 Million) in one year. Check Lundin Gold Inc (LUG) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lundin Gold Inc (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lundin Gold Inc from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lundin Gold Inc across 27 annual periods. Check Lundin Gold Inc (LUG) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lundin Gold Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Lundin Gold Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lundin Gold Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lundin Gold Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.13x | CA$662.39 Million | CA$311.18 Million | ▲ +110.0% |
| 2023 | 1.01x | CA$519.39 Million | CA$512.40 Million | ▲ +94.3% |
| 2022 | 0.52x | CA$426.14 Million | CA$816.78 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2021 | 0.48x | CA$417.75 Million | CA$870.64 Million | ▲ +287.8% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$113.64 Million | CA$918.50 Million | ▲ +647.1% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | CA$-21.31 Million | CA$942.14 Million | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2018 | -0.08x | CA$-32.13 Million | CA$414.42 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2017 | -0.12x | CA$-28.48 Million | CA$246.88 Million | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2016 | -6.26x | CA$-57.39 Million | CA$9.16 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2015 | -6.63x | CA$-43.24 Million | CA$6.52 Million | ▼ -3596.8% |
| 2014 | -0.18x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$6.46 Million | ▲ +91.1% |
| 2013 | -2.02x | CA$-141.18K | CA$69.96K | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2012 | -8.36x | CA$-276.13K | CA$33.03K | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2011 | -32.79x | CA$-967.65K | CA$29.51K | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2010 | -40.32x | CA$-4.22 Million | CA$104.67K | ▼ -290.4% |
| 2009 | -10.33x | CA$-6.47 Million | CA$626.43K | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2008 | -38.37x | CA$-14.16 Million | CA$369.12K | ▼ -256.9% |
| 2007 | -10.75x | CA$-11.26 Million | CA$1.05 Million | ▼ -778.5% |
| 2006 | -1.22x | CA$-792.57K | CA$647.67K | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2005 | -7.29x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$166.05K | ▼ -301.4% |
| 2004 | -1.82x | CA$-900.10K | CA$495.68K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2003 | -1.59x | CA$-132.88K | CA$83.69K | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2002 | -7.25x | CA$-387.35K | CA$53.39K | ▼ -490.7% |
| 2001 | 1.86x | CA$89.05K | CA$47.95K | ▲ +140.6% |
| 2000 | -4.58x | CA$-92.47K | CA$20.21K | ▼ -8741.2% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | CA$-4.86K | CA$93.88K | ▲ +99.3% |
| 1998 | -7.45x | CA$-138.90K | CA$18.65K | — |