Lundin Mining Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lundin Mining Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.18x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$491.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.75 Billion) in one year. Check LUN operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lundin Mining Corporation (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lundin Mining Corporation from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lundin Mining Corporation across 25 annual periods. Check Lundin Mining Corporation cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lundin Mining Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Lundin Mining Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lundin Mining Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LUN cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.46x | CA$1.31 Billion | CA$2.87 Billion | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | CA$1.35 Billion | CA$4.89 Billion | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | CA$985.52 Million | CA$4.41 Billion | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | CA$858.78 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2021 | 0.57x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$2.62 Billion | ▲ +141.8% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | CA$599.40 Million | CA$2.56 Billion | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | CA$676.92 Million | CA$2.55 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | CA$454.12 Million | CA$1.75 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | CA$846.39 Million | CA$2.10 Billion | ▲ +186.0% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | CA$350.97 Million | CA$2.49 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | CA$618.10 Million | CA$2.54 Billion | ▲ +144.8% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | CA$280.06 Million | CA$2.82 Billion | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2013 | 0.38x | CA$303.34 Million | CA$803.61 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | CA$194.34 Million | CA$514.01 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2011 | 0.53x | CA$300.37 Million | CA$567.34 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2010 | 0.43x | CA$284.29 Million | CA$668.27 Million | ▲ +134.8% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | CA$148.97 Million | CA$822.17 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$214.13 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2007 | 0.43x | CA$464.06 Million | CA$1.09 Billion | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2006 | 0.35x | CA$240.88 Million | CA$687.51 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2005 | 0.43x | CA$69.27 Million | CA$161.96 Million | ▲ +389.0% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | CA$13.13 Million | CA$150.07 Million | ▲ +134.1% |
| 2003 | -0.26x | CA$-558.71K | CA$2.18 Million | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | CA$-571.10K | CA$3.52 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2001 | -0.13x | CA$-344.12K | CA$2.61 Million | — |