Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$31.73 Million) in one year. Explore MGA long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mega Uranium Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mega Uranium Ltd. across 29 annual periods. Also explore MGA total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mega Uranium Ltd. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mega Uranium Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Mega Uranium Ltd..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.09x | CA$-2.55 Million | CA$29.66 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2024 | -0.05x | CA$-946.00K | CA$18.15 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CA$-644.00K | CA$10.69 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2022 | -0.90x | CA$-2.21 Million | CA$2.45 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2021 | -1.32x | CA$-1.54 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2020 | -1.14x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +59.3% |
| 2019 | -2.79x | CA$-1.78 Million | CA$636.00K | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2018 | -2.67x | CA$-1.43 Million | CA$535.00K | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2017 | -7.47x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$231.00K | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2016 | -11.08x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$197.00K | ▼ -1451.5% |
| 2015 | -0.71x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▼ -200.3% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | CA$-449.00K | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2013 | -0.61x | CA$-2.08 Million | CA$3.41 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2012 | -3.18x | CA$-5.83 Million | CA$1.83 Million | ▼ -173.5% |
| 2011 | -1.16x | CA$-4.78 Million | CA$4.11 Million | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2010 | -0.88x | CA$-9.98 Million | CA$11.36 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2009 | -0.52x | CA$-13.91 Million | CA$26.96 Million | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | CA$-16.75 Million | CA$66.06 Million | ▼ -716.4% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | CA$-4.54 Million | CA$146.08 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2006 | -0.39x | CA$-3.79 Million | CA$9.66 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2005 | -5.78x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$208.58K | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2004 | -6.13x | CA$-198.89K | CA$32.43K | ▼ -3183.2% |
| 2003 | -0.19x | CA$-36.28K | CA$194.23K | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2002 | -0.68x | CA$-48.59K | CA$71.54K | ▼ -81.4% |
| 2001 | -0.37x | CA$-109.31K | CA$292.02K | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2000 | -0.33x | CA$-127.83K | CA$391.67K | ▼ -321.8% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | CA$29.56K | CA$200.90K | ▲ +121.7% |
| 1998 | -0.68x | CA$-157.14K | CA$231.31K | ▲ +74.0% |
| 1997 | -2.61x | CA$-518.28K | CA$198.43K | — |