Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$34.20 Million) in one year. See Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mega Uranium Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mega Uranium Ltd. across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Mega Uranium Ltd..
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mega Uranium Ltd. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mega Uranium Ltd.. Check Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.09x | CA$-2.55 Million | CA$29.66 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2024 | -0.05x | CA$-946.00K | CA$18.15 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CA$-644.00K | CA$10.69 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2022 | -0.90x | CA$-2.21 Million | CA$2.45 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2021 | -1.32x | CA$-1.54 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2020 | -1.14x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +59.3% |
| 2019 | -2.79x | CA$-1.78 Million | CA$636.00K | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2018 | -2.67x | CA$-1.43 Million | CA$535.00K | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2017 | -7.47x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$231.00K | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2016 | -11.08x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$197.00K | ▼ -1451.5% |
| 2015 | -0.71x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▼ -200.3% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | CA$-449.00K | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2013 | -0.61x | CA$-2.08 Million | CA$3.41 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2012 | -3.18x | CA$-5.83 Million | CA$1.83 Million | ▼ -173.5% |
| 2011 | -1.16x | CA$-4.78 Million | CA$4.11 Million | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2010 | -0.88x | CA$-9.98 Million | CA$11.36 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2009 | -0.52x | CA$-13.91 Million | CA$26.96 Million | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | CA$-16.75 Million | CA$66.06 Million | ▼ -716.4% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | CA$-4.54 Million | CA$146.08 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2006 | -0.39x | CA$-3.79 Million | CA$9.66 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2005 | -5.78x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$208.58K | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2004 | -6.13x | CA$-198.89K | CA$32.43K | ▼ -3183.2% |
| 2003 | -0.19x | CA$-36.28K | CA$194.23K | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2002 | -0.68x | CA$-48.59K | CA$71.54K | ▼ -81.4% |
| 2001 | -0.37x | CA$-109.31K | CA$292.02K | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2000 | -0.33x | CA$-127.83K | CA$391.67K | ▼ -321.8% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | CA$29.56K | CA$200.90K | ▲ +121.7% |
| 1998 | -0.68x | CA$-157.14K | CA$231.31K | ▲ +74.0% |
| 1997 | -2.61x | CA$-518.28K | CA$198.43K | — |