Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$31.73 Million) in one year. See Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mega Uranium Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mega Uranium Ltd. across 29 annual periods. Also explore MGA shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mega Uranium Ltd. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mega Uranium Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MGA market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.09x | CA$-2.55 Million | CA$29.66 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2024 | -0.05x | CA$-946.00K | CA$18.15 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CA$-644.00K | CA$10.69 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2022 | -0.90x | CA$-2.21 Million | CA$2.45 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2021 | -1.32x | CA$-1.54 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2020 | -1.14x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +59.3% |
| 2019 | -2.79x | CA$-1.78 Million | CA$636.00K | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2018 | -2.67x | CA$-1.43 Million | CA$535.00K | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2017 | -7.47x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$231.00K | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2016 | -11.08x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$197.00K | ▼ -1451.5% |
| 2015 | -0.71x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▼ -200.3% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | CA$-449.00K | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2013 | -0.61x | CA$-2.08 Million | CA$3.41 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2012 | -3.18x | CA$-5.83 Million | CA$1.83 Million | ▼ -173.5% |
| 2011 | -1.16x | CA$-4.78 Million | CA$4.11 Million | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2010 | -0.88x | CA$-9.98 Million | CA$11.36 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2009 | -0.52x | CA$-13.91 Million | CA$26.96 Million | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | CA$-16.75 Million | CA$66.06 Million | ▼ -716.4% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | CA$-4.54 Million | CA$146.08 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2006 | -0.39x | CA$-3.79 Million | CA$9.66 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2005 | -5.78x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$208.58K | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2004 | -6.13x | CA$-198.89K | CA$32.43K | ▼ -3183.2% |
| 2003 | -0.19x | CA$-36.28K | CA$194.23K | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2002 | -0.68x | CA$-48.59K | CA$71.54K | ▼ -81.4% |
| 2001 | -0.37x | CA$-109.31K | CA$292.02K | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2000 | -0.33x | CA$-127.83K | CA$391.67K | ▼ -321.8% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | CA$29.56K | CA$200.90K | ▲ +121.7% |
| 1998 | -0.68x | CA$-157.14K | CA$231.31K | ▲ +74.0% |
| 1997 | -2.61x | CA$-518.28K | CA$198.43K | — |