Mega Uranium Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mega Uranium Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mega Uranium Ltd. (MGA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$34.20 Million) in one year. Check how high is Mega Uranium Ltd.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mega Uranium Ltd. (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mega Uranium Ltd. from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mega Uranium Ltd. across 29 annual periods. Check MGA cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Mega Uranium Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Mega Uranium Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mega Uranium Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Mega Uranium Ltd. generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.09x | CA$-2.55 Million | CA$29.66 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2024 | -0.05x | CA$-946.00K | CA$18.15 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CA$-644.00K | CA$10.69 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2022 | -0.90x | CA$-2.21 Million | CA$2.45 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2021 | -1.32x | CA$-1.54 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2020 | -1.14x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +59.3% |
| 2019 | -2.79x | CA$-1.78 Million | CA$636.00K | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2018 | -2.67x | CA$-1.43 Million | CA$535.00K | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2017 | -7.47x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$231.00K | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2016 | -11.08x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$197.00K | ▼ -1451.5% |
| 2015 | -0.71x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▼ -200.3% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | CA$-449.00K | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2013 | -0.61x | CA$-2.08 Million | CA$3.41 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2012 | -3.18x | CA$-5.83 Million | CA$1.83 Million | ▼ -173.5% |
| 2011 | -1.16x | CA$-4.78 Million | CA$4.11 Million | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2010 | -0.88x | CA$-9.98 Million | CA$11.36 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2009 | -0.52x | CA$-13.91 Million | CA$26.96 Million | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | CA$-16.75 Million | CA$66.06 Million | ▼ -716.4% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | CA$-4.54 Million | CA$146.08 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2006 | -0.39x | CA$-3.79 Million | CA$9.66 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2005 | -5.78x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$208.58K | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2004 | -6.13x | CA$-198.89K | CA$32.43K | ▼ -3183.2% |
| 2003 | -0.19x | CA$-36.28K | CA$194.23K | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2002 | -0.68x | CA$-48.59K | CA$71.54K | ▼ -81.4% |
| 2001 | -0.37x | CA$-109.31K | CA$292.02K | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2000 | -0.33x | CA$-127.83K | CA$391.67K | ▼ -321.8% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | CA$29.56K | CA$200.90K | ▲ +121.7% |
| 1998 | -0.68x | CA$-157.14K | CA$231.31K | ▲ +74.0% |
| 1997 | -2.61x | CA$-518.28K | CA$198.43K | — |