Mandalay Resources Corp (MND) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mandalay Resources Corp (MND) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.24x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$27.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$115.94 Million) in one year. See Mandalay Resources Corp free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mandalay Resources Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mandalay Resources Corp across 26 annual periods. Also explore MND net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mandalay Resources Corp (1999–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mandalay Resources Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Mandalay Resources Corp (MND) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.12x | CA$112.72 Million | CA$100.31 Million | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | CA$43.29 Million | CA$98.32 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2022 | 0.82x | CA$80.04 Million | CA$98.07 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | CA$62.03 Million | CA$141.16 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | CA$61.66 Million | CA$165.50 Million | ▲ +620.5% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$7.59 Million | CA$146.84 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | CA$23.88 Million | CA$141.57 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | CA$27.49 Million | CA$139.52 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | CA$47.30 Million | CA$147.19 Million | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2015 | 0.48x | CA$66.36 Million | CA$138.88 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | CA$46.60 Million | CA$146.32 Million | ▼ -79.6% |
| 2013 | 1.56x | CA$71.13 Million | CA$45.58 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2012 | 1.44x | CA$60.59 Million | CA$42.21 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2011 | 0.74x | CA$29.66 Million | CA$39.92 Million | ▲ +3265.6% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | CA$-794.97K | CA$33.88 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | CA$-215.66K | CA$7.37 Million | ▲ +95.1% |
| 2008 | -0.59x | CA$-497.84K | CA$839.17K | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2007 | -1.96x | CA$-598.94K | CA$304.98K | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2006 | -7.09x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$145.21K | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2005 | -4.49x | CA$-397.61K | CA$88.55K | ▼ -1992.8% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | CA$58.43K | CA$246.33K | ▲ +105.9% |
| 2003 | -3.99x | CA$-290.48K | CA$72.74K | ▼ -309.9% |
| 2002 | -0.97x | CA$-68.81K | CA$70.63K | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2001 | -3.73x | CA$-111.76K | CA$29.93K | ▼ -1206.2% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | CA$23.87K | CA$70.73K | ▲ +115.2% |
| 1999 | -2.22x | CA$-31.25K | CA$14.08K | — |