Mandalay Resources Corp (MND) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mandalay Resources Corp (MND) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.24x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$27.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$115.94 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Mandalay Resources Corp to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mandalay Resources Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mandalay Resources Corp across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mandalay Resources Corp cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mandalay Resources Corp (1999–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mandalay Resources Corp. Check Mandalay Resources Corp cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.12x | CA$112.72 Million | CA$100.31 Million | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | CA$43.29 Million | CA$98.32 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2022 | 0.82x | CA$80.04 Million | CA$98.07 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | CA$62.03 Million | CA$141.16 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | CA$61.66 Million | CA$165.50 Million | ▲ +620.5% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$7.59 Million | CA$146.84 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | CA$23.88 Million | CA$141.57 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | CA$27.49 Million | CA$139.52 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | CA$47.30 Million | CA$147.19 Million | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2015 | 0.48x | CA$66.36 Million | CA$138.88 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | CA$46.60 Million | CA$146.32 Million | ▼ -79.6% |
| 2013 | 1.56x | CA$71.13 Million | CA$45.58 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2012 | 1.44x | CA$60.59 Million | CA$42.21 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2011 | 0.74x | CA$29.66 Million | CA$39.92 Million | ▲ +3265.6% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | CA$-794.97K | CA$33.88 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | CA$-215.66K | CA$7.37 Million | ▲ +95.1% |
| 2008 | -0.59x | CA$-497.84K | CA$839.17K | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2007 | -1.96x | CA$-598.94K | CA$304.98K | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2006 | -7.09x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$145.21K | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2005 | -4.49x | CA$-397.61K | CA$88.55K | ▼ -1992.8% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | CA$58.43K | CA$246.33K | ▲ +105.9% |
| 2003 | -3.99x | CA$-290.48K | CA$72.74K | ▼ -309.9% |
| 2002 | -0.97x | CA$-68.81K | CA$70.63K | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2001 | -3.73x | CA$-111.76K | CA$29.93K | ▼ -1206.2% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | CA$23.87K | CA$70.73K | ▲ +115.2% |
| 1999 | -2.22x | CA$-31.25K | CA$14.08K | — |