Mandalay Resources Corp (MND) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mandalay Resources Corp (MND) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.24x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$27.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$115.94 Million) in one year. Check MND cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mandalay Resources Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mandalay Resources Corp across 26 annual periods. Also explore Mandalay Resources Corp assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mandalay Resources Corp (1999–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mandalay Resources Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MND stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.12x | CA$112.72 Million | CA$100.31 Million | ▲ +155.2% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | CA$43.29 Million | CA$98.32 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2022 | 0.82x | CA$80.04 Million | CA$98.07 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | CA$62.03 Million | CA$141.16 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | CA$61.66 Million | CA$165.50 Million | ▲ +620.5% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$7.59 Million | CA$146.84 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | CA$23.88 Million | CA$141.57 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | CA$27.49 Million | CA$139.52 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | CA$47.30 Million | CA$147.19 Million | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2015 | 0.48x | CA$66.36 Million | CA$138.88 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | CA$46.60 Million | CA$146.32 Million | ▼ -79.6% |
| 2013 | 1.56x | CA$71.13 Million | CA$45.58 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2012 | 1.44x | CA$60.59 Million | CA$42.21 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2011 | 0.74x | CA$29.66 Million | CA$39.92 Million | ▲ +3265.6% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | CA$-794.97K | CA$33.88 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | CA$-215.66K | CA$7.37 Million | ▲ +95.1% |
| 2008 | -0.59x | CA$-497.84K | CA$839.17K | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2007 | -1.96x | CA$-598.94K | CA$304.98K | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2006 | -7.09x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$145.21K | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2005 | -4.49x | CA$-397.61K | CA$88.55K | ▼ -1992.8% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | CA$58.43K | CA$246.33K | ▲ +105.9% |
| 2003 | -3.99x | CA$-290.48K | CA$72.74K | ▼ -309.9% |
| 2002 | -0.97x | CA$-68.81K | CA$70.63K | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2001 | -3.73x | CA$-111.76K | CA$29.93K | ▼ -1206.2% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | CA$23.87K | CA$70.73K | ▲ +115.2% |
| 1999 | -2.22x | CA$-31.25K | CA$14.08K | — |