Martinrea International Inc. (MRE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Martinrea International Inc. (MRE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.34 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Martinrea International Inc. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Martinrea International Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Martinrea International Inc. across 30 annual periods. Also explore MRE net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Martinrea International Inc. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Martinrea International Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Martinrea International Inc. market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$430.49 Million | CA$2.23 Billion | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | CA$433.29 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | CA$511.09 Million | CA$2.52 Billion | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | CA$437.78 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +114.8% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CA$180.03 Million | CA$2.44 Billion | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | CA$355.02 Million | CA$2.19 Billion | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$401.55 Million | CA$1.88 Billion | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | CA$296.70 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | CA$302.86 Million | CA$1.58 Billion | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | CA$259.72 Million | CA$1.64 Billion | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | CA$192.63 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | CA$264.35 Million | CA$1.54 Billion | ▲ +73.4% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | CA$135.80 Million | CA$1.37 Billion | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$95.59 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | CA$35.02 Million | CA$875.30 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | CA$80.13 Million | CA$411.00 Million | ▲ +3166.3% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | CA$-3.69 Million | CA$579.56 Million | ▼ -106.1% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | CA$55.84 Million | CA$538.50 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$48.91 Million | CA$596.57 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | CA$34.52 Million | CA$859.16 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | CA$56.97 Million | CA$213.92 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2004 | 0.25x | CA$47.89 Million | CA$187.87 Million | ▲ +260.8% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | CA$15.62 Million | CA$221.15 Million | ▲ +156.1% |
| 2002 | -0.13x | CA$-22.53 Million | CA$178.91 Million | ▼ -261.5% |
| 2001 | -0.03x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$43.80 Million | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2000 | -0.19x | CA$-8.48 Million | CA$43.99 Million | ▼ -428.5% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | CA$2.60 Million | CA$44.30 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | CA$4.10 Million | CA$19.50 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | CA$2.70 Million | CA$16.30 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | CA$1.20 Million | CA$6.20 Million | — |