Martinrea International Inc. (MRE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Martinrea International Inc. (MRE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$120.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.39 Billion) in one year. See MRE financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Martinrea International Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Martinrea International Inc. across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Martinrea International Inc..
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Martinrea International Inc. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Martinrea International Inc.. Check MRE cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$430.49 Million | CA$2.23 Billion | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | CA$433.29 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | CA$511.09 Million | CA$2.52 Billion | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | CA$437.78 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +114.8% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CA$180.03 Million | CA$2.44 Billion | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | CA$355.02 Million | CA$2.19 Billion | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$401.55 Million | CA$1.88 Billion | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | CA$296.70 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | CA$302.86 Million | CA$1.58 Billion | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | CA$259.72 Million | CA$1.64 Billion | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | CA$192.63 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | CA$264.35 Million | CA$1.54 Billion | ▲ +73.4% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | CA$135.80 Million | CA$1.37 Billion | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$95.59 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | CA$35.02 Million | CA$875.30 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | CA$80.13 Million | CA$411.00 Million | ▲ +3166.3% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | CA$-3.69 Million | CA$579.56 Million | ▼ -106.1% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | CA$55.84 Million | CA$538.50 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$48.91 Million | CA$596.57 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | CA$34.52 Million | CA$859.16 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | CA$56.97 Million | CA$213.92 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2004 | 0.25x | CA$47.89 Million | CA$187.87 Million | ▲ +260.8% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | CA$15.62 Million | CA$221.15 Million | ▲ +156.1% |
| 2002 | -0.13x | CA$-22.53 Million | CA$178.91 Million | ▼ -261.5% |
| 2001 | -0.03x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$43.80 Million | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2000 | -0.19x | CA$-8.48 Million | CA$43.99 Million | ▼ -428.5% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | CA$2.60 Million | CA$44.30 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | CA$4.10 Million | CA$19.50 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | CA$2.70 Million | CA$16.30 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | CA$1.20 Million | CA$6.20 Million | — |