Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust (MRT-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust (MRT-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$5.03 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.30 Billion) in one year. Explore MRT-UN long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust across 28 annual periods. Also explore how large is Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MRT-UN market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | CA$40.41 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | CA$54.46 Million | CA$1.29 Billion | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$66.32 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | CA$73.97 Million | CA$1.33 Billion | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$80.19 Million | CA$1.34 Billion | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | CA$46.92 Million | CA$1.40 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | CA$89.36 Million | CA$1.40 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | CA$93.47 Million | CA$1.40 Billion | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$100.82 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | CA$115.15 Million | CA$1.48 Billion | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$97.96 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$104.62 Million | CA$1.41 Billion | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | CA$89.55 Million | CA$1.39 Billion | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | CA$85.34 Million | CA$1.28 Billion | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | CA$74.06 Million | CA$964.48 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | CA$79.76 Million | CA$901.84 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | CA$64.11 Million | CA$791.78 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | CA$69.49 Million | CA$724.60 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | CA$137.61 Million | CA$893.97 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | CA$85.90 Million | CA$838.32 Million | ▲ +80.2% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | CA$50.21 Million | CA$883.14 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | CA$97.48 Million | CA$729.87 Million | ▲ +102.8% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | CA$49.27 Million | CA$748.07 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | CA$41.80 Million | CA$621.00 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | CA$35.90 Million | CA$539.88 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | CA$39.33 Million | CA$552.77 Million | ▲ +95.5% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | CA$15.90 Million | CA$436.93 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | CA$18.95 Million | CA$195.00 Million | — |