Metro Inc. (MRU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Metro Inc. (MRU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$545.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.59 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Metro Inc.'s assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Metro Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Metro Inc. across 31 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Metro Inc. for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Metro Inc. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Metro Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MRU stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | CA$1.61 Billion | CA$7.49 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$1.56 Billion | CA$7.10 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | CA$1.56 Billion | CA$7.05 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | CA$1.37 Billion | CA$6.78 Billion | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$7.18 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | CA$1.38 Billion | CA$7.27 Billion | ▲ +41.2% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$687.70 Million | CA$5.11 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | CA$750.40 Million | CA$5.27 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | CA$707.80 Million | CA$3.13 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | CA$716.80 Million | CA$2.91 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | CA$684.70 Million | CA$2.73 Billion | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | CA$437.20 Million | CA$2.60 Billion | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | CA$570.10 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | CA$552.30 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | CA$542.40 Million | CA$2.43 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | CA$547.80 Million | CA$2.38 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | CA$520.10 Million | CA$2.39 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | CA$450.20 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | CA$363.30 Million | CA$2.34 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | CA$392.00 Million | CA$2.43 Billion | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | CA$281.90 Million | CA$2.41 Billion | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2004 | 0.43x | CA$309.40 Million | CA$711.30 Million | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | CA$197.00 Million | CA$761.80 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2002 | 0.33x | CA$226.00 Million | CA$685.00 Million | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | CA$146.00 Million | CA$629.00 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | CA$156.00 Million | CA$598.00 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | CA$193.90 Million | CA$604.00 Million | ▲ +17.8% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | CA$121.20 Million | CA$444.90 Million | ▲ +31.4% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | CA$89.00 Million | CA$429.30 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 1996 | 0.22x | CA$94.10 Million | CA$422.60 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 1995 | 0.31x | CA$102.40 Million | CA$325.70 Million | — |