Metro Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Metro Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Metro Inc. (MRU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$545.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.59 Billion) in one year. Check Metro Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Metro Inc. (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Metro Inc. from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Metro Inc. across 31 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Metro Inc. reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Metro Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Metro Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Metro Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Metro Inc. (MRU) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | CA$1.61 Billion | CA$7.49 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$1.56 Billion | CA$7.10 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | CA$1.56 Billion | CA$7.05 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | CA$1.37 Billion | CA$6.78 Billion | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$7.18 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | CA$1.38 Billion | CA$7.27 Billion | ▲ +41.2% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$687.70 Million | CA$5.11 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | CA$750.40 Million | CA$5.27 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | CA$707.80 Million | CA$3.13 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | CA$716.80 Million | CA$2.91 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | CA$684.70 Million | CA$2.73 Billion | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | CA$437.20 Million | CA$2.60 Billion | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | CA$570.10 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | CA$552.30 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | CA$542.40 Million | CA$2.43 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | CA$547.80 Million | CA$2.38 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | CA$520.10 Million | CA$2.39 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | CA$450.20 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | CA$363.30 Million | CA$2.34 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | CA$392.00 Million | CA$2.43 Billion | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | CA$281.90 Million | CA$2.41 Billion | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2004 | 0.43x | CA$309.40 Million | CA$711.30 Million | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | CA$197.00 Million | CA$761.80 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2002 | 0.33x | CA$226.00 Million | CA$685.00 Million | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | CA$146.00 Million | CA$629.00 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | CA$156.00 Million | CA$598.00 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | CA$193.90 Million | CA$604.00 Million | ▲ +17.8% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | CA$121.20 Million | CA$444.90 Million | ▲ +31.4% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | CA$89.00 Million | CA$429.30 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 1996 | 0.22x | CA$94.10 Million | CA$422.60 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 1995 | 0.31x | CA$102.40 Million | CA$325.70 Million | — |