Metro Inc. (MRU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Metro Inc. (MRU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$545.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.59 Billion) in one year. See Metro Inc. leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Metro Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Metro Inc. across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Metro Inc. operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Metro Inc. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Metro Inc.. Check cash flow quality index of Metro Inc. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | CA$1.61 Billion | CA$7.49 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$1.56 Billion | CA$7.10 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | CA$1.56 Billion | CA$7.05 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | CA$1.37 Billion | CA$6.78 Billion | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$7.18 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | CA$1.38 Billion | CA$7.27 Billion | ▲ +41.2% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$687.70 Million | CA$5.11 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | CA$750.40 Million | CA$5.27 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | CA$707.80 Million | CA$3.13 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | CA$716.80 Million | CA$2.91 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | CA$684.70 Million | CA$2.73 Billion | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | CA$437.20 Million | CA$2.60 Billion | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | CA$570.10 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | CA$552.30 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | CA$542.40 Million | CA$2.43 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | CA$547.80 Million | CA$2.38 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | CA$520.10 Million | CA$2.39 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | CA$450.20 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | CA$363.30 Million | CA$2.34 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | CA$392.00 Million | CA$2.43 Billion | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | CA$281.90 Million | CA$2.41 Billion | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2004 | 0.43x | CA$309.40 Million | CA$711.30 Million | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | CA$197.00 Million | CA$761.80 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2002 | 0.33x | CA$226.00 Million | CA$685.00 Million | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | CA$146.00 Million | CA$629.00 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | CA$156.00 Million | CA$598.00 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | CA$193.90 Million | CA$604.00 Million | ▲ +17.8% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | CA$121.20 Million | CA$444.90 Million | ▲ +31.4% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | CA$89.00 Million | CA$429.30 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 1996 | 0.22x | CA$94.10 Million | CA$422.60 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 1995 | 0.31x | CA$102.40 Million | CA$325.70 Million | — |