Methanex Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Methanex Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Methanex Corporation (MX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$366.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.29 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Methanex Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Methanex Corporation (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Methanex Corporation from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Methanex Corporation across 34 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Methanex Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Methanex Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Methanex Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Methanex Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Methanex Corporation cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$832.29 Million | CA$4.55 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$737.18 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | CA$660.27 Million | CA$4.25 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | CA$977.76 Million | CA$4.20 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | CA$993.93 Million | CA$4.13 Billion | ▲ +121.8% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | CA$461.08 Million | CA$4.25 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | CA$515.43 Million | CA$3.57 Billion | ▼ -58.7% |
| 2018 | 0.35x | CA$980.21 Million | CA$2.80 Billion | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2017 | 0.27x | CA$787.74 Million | CA$2.87 Billion | ▲ +202.6% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$249.93 Million | CA$2.75 Billion | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | CA$296.95 Million | CA$2.53 Billion | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | CA$801.02 Million | CA$2.72 Billion | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | CA$585.80 Million | CA$2.21 Billion | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | CA$458.28 Million | CA$2.07 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | CA$479.71 Million | CA$1.79 Billion | ▲ +188.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | CA$152.88 Million | CA$1.65 Billion | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$110.26 Million | CA$1.55 Billion | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | CA$325.05 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | CA$527.34 Million | CA$1.49 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | CA$468.84 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | CA$363.05 Million | CA$1.15 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | CA$335.62 Million | CA$1.18 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | CA$360.96 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | CA$190.11 Million | CA$915.23 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | CA$376.46 Million | CA$757.89 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2000 | 0.28x | CA$215.80 Million | CA$758.48 Million | ▲ +2510.8% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | CA$7.50 Million | CA$688.20 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | CA$71.40 Million | CA$691.50 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 1997 | 0.45x | CA$346.40 Million | CA$777.40 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | CA$196.20 Million | CA$659.00 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 1995 | 0.80x | CA$509.30 Million | CA$635.30 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 1994 | 0.51x | CA$345.30 Million | CA$680.50 Million | ▲ +3127.8% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | CA$8.50 Million | CA$540.70 Million | ▲ +109.8% |
| 1992 | -0.16x | CA$-22.60 Million | CA$140.20 Million | — |