Methanex Corporation (MX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Methanex Corporation (MX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$366.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.29 Billion) in one year. See Methanex Corporation (MX) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Methanex Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Methanex Corporation across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Methanex Corporation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Methanex Corporation (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Methanex Corporation. Check Methanex Corporation (MX) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$832.29 Million | CA$4.55 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$737.18 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | CA$660.27 Million | CA$4.25 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | CA$977.76 Million | CA$4.20 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | CA$993.93 Million | CA$4.13 Billion | ▲ +121.8% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | CA$461.08 Million | CA$4.25 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | CA$515.43 Million | CA$3.57 Billion | ▼ -58.7% |
| 2018 | 0.35x | CA$980.21 Million | CA$2.80 Billion | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2017 | 0.27x | CA$787.74 Million | CA$2.87 Billion | ▲ +202.6% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$249.93 Million | CA$2.75 Billion | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | CA$296.95 Million | CA$2.53 Billion | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | CA$801.02 Million | CA$2.72 Billion | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | CA$585.80 Million | CA$2.21 Billion | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | CA$458.28 Million | CA$2.07 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | CA$479.71 Million | CA$1.79 Billion | ▲ +188.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | CA$152.88 Million | CA$1.65 Billion | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$110.26 Million | CA$1.55 Billion | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | CA$325.05 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | CA$527.34 Million | CA$1.49 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | CA$468.84 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | CA$363.05 Million | CA$1.15 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | CA$335.62 Million | CA$1.18 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | CA$360.96 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | CA$190.11 Million | CA$915.23 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | CA$376.46 Million | CA$757.89 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2000 | 0.28x | CA$215.80 Million | CA$758.48 Million | ▲ +2510.8% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | CA$7.50 Million | CA$688.20 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | CA$71.40 Million | CA$691.50 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 1997 | 0.45x | CA$346.40 Million | CA$777.40 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | CA$196.20 Million | CA$659.00 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 1995 | 0.80x | CA$509.30 Million | CA$635.30 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 1994 | 0.51x | CA$345.30 Million | CA$680.50 Million | ▲ +3127.8% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | CA$8.50 Million | CA$540.70 Million | ▲ +109.8% |
| 1992 | -0.16x | CA$-22.60 Million | CA$140.20 Million | — |