Methanex Corporation (MX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Methanex Corporation (MX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$92.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.51 Billion) in one year. Explore MX long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Methanex Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Methanex Corporation across 34 annual periods. Also explore how large is Methanex Corporation's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Methanex Corporation (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Methanex Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Methanex Corporation (MX) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$832.29 Million | CA$4.55 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$737.18 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | CA$660.27 Million | CA$4.25 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | CA$977.76 Million | CA$4.20 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | CA$993.93 Million | CA$4.13 Billion | ▲ +121.8% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | CA$461.08 Million | CA$4.25 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | CA$515.43 Million | CA$3.57 Billion | ▼ -58.7% |
| 2018 | 0.35x | CA$980.21 Million | CA$2.80 Billion | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2017 | 0.27x | CA$787.74 Million | CA$2.87 Billion | ▲ +202.6% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$249.93 Million | CA$2.75 Billion | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | CA$296.95 Million | CA$2.53 Billion | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | CA$801.02 Million | CA$2.72 Billion | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | CA$585.80 Million | CA$2.21 Billion | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | CA$458.28 Million | CA$2.07 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | CA$479.71 Million | CA$1.79 Billion | ▲ +188.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | CA$152.88 Million | CA$1.65 Billion | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$110.26 Million | CA$1.55 Billion | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | CA$325.05 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | CA$527.34 Million | CA$1.49 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | CA$468.84 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | CA$363.05 Million | CA$1.15 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | CA$335.62 Million | CA$1.18 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | CA$360.96 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | CA$190.11 Million | CA$915.23 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | CA$376.46 Million | CA$757.89 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2000 | 0.28x | CA$215.80 Million | CA$758.48 Million | ▲ +2510.8% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | CA$7.50 Million | CA$688.20 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | CA$71.40 Million | CA$691.50 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 1997 | 0.45x | CA$346.40 Million | CA$777.40 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | CA$196.20 Million | CA$659.00 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 1995 | 0.80x | CA$509.30 Million | CA$635.30 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 1994 | 0.51x | CA$345.30 Million | CA$680.50 Million | ▲ +3127.8% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | CA$8.50 Million | CA$540.70 Million | ▲ +109.8% |
| 1992 | -0.16x | CA$-22.60 Million | CA$140.20 Million | — |