Orezone Gold Corp (ORE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Orezone Gold Corp (ORE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$48.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$255.87 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Orezone Gold Corp generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Orezone Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Orezone Gold Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore Orezone Gold Corp (ORE) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Orezone Gold Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Orezone Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Orezone Gold Corp (ORE) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.34x | CA$87.84 Million | CA$255.87 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$57.70 Million | CA$184.57 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2023 | 0.46x | CA$79.95 Million | CA$173.72 Million | ▲ +1172.3% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$6.58 Million | CA$181.95 Million | ▲ +152.7% |
| 2021 | -0.07x | CA$-5.94 Million | CA$86.62 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2020 | -5.26x | CA$-17.33 Million | CA$3.30 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2019 | -5.39x | CA$-20.94 Million | CA$3.89 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2018 | -3.97x | CA$-11.94 Million | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +71.7% |
| 2017 | -14.00x | CA$-8.54 Million | CA$610.47K | ▼ -1362.1% |
| 2016 | -0.96x | CA$-4.22 Million | CA$4.41 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2015 | -2.00x | CA$-7.02 Million | CA$3.51 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2014 | -6.93x | CA$-8.96 Million | CA$1.29 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2013 | -34.49x | CA$-11.76 Million | CA$341.05K | ▼ -161.4% |
| 2012 | -13.19x | CA$-24.74 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2011 | -20.11x | CA$-28.51 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▼ -1408.3% |
| 2010 | -1.33x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$912.89K | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2009 | -2.66x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$482.05K | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2008 | -8.22x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$472.26K | ▼ -207458.3% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | CA$-19.33K | CA$4.88 Million | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2006 | -0.35x | CA$-589.28K | CA$1.68 Million | ▼ -252.5% |
| 2005 | -0.10x | CA$-355.73K | CA$3.57 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2004 | -0.19x | CA$-186.97K | CA$977.64K | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2003 | -0.50x | CA$-783.38K | CA$1.57 Million | ▼ -234.6% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | CA$-162.29K | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -225.0% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | CA$34.95K | CA$293.04K | ▲ +111.8% |
| 2000 | -1.01x | CA$-137.55K | CA$136.01K | ▲ +70.0% |
| 1999 | -3.37x | CA$-244.26K | CA$72.39K | ▼ -605.3% |
| 1998 | -0.48x | CA$-134.03K | CA$280.17K | ▲ +90.7% |
| 1997 | -5.14x | CA$-208.71K | CA$40.61K | — |