Orezone Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Orezone Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Orezone Gold Corp (ORE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.23x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$169.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$739.50 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Orezone Gold Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Orezone Gold Corp (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Orezone Gold Corp from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Orezone Gold Corp across 29 annual periods. Check ORE cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Orezone Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Orezone Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Orezone Gold Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Orezone Gold Corp cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.34x | CA$87.84 Million | CA$255.87 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$57.70 Million | CA$184.57 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2023 | 0.46x | CA$79.95 Million | CA$173.72 Million | ▲ +1172.3% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$6.58 Million | CA$181.95 Million | ▲ +152.7% |
| 2021 | -0.07x | CA$-5.94 Million | CA$86.62 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2020 | -5.26x | CA$-17.33 Million | CA$3.30 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2019 | -5.39x | CA$-20.94 Million | CA$3.89 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2018 | -3.97x | CA$-11.94 Million | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +71.7% |
| 2017 | -14.00x | CA$-8.54 Million | CA$610.47K | ▼ -1362.1% |
| 2016 | -0.96x | CA$-4.22 Million | CA$4.41 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2015 | -2.00x | CA$-7.02 Million | CA$3.51 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2014 | -6.93x | CA$-8.96 Million | CA$1.29 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2013 | -34.49x | CA$-11.76 Million | CA$341.05K | ▼ -161.4% |
| 2012 | -13.19x | CA$-24.74 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2011 | -20.11x | CA$-28.51 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▼ -1408.3% |
| 2010 | -1.33x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$912.89K | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2009 | -2.66x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$482.05K | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2008 | -8.22x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$472.26K | ▼ -207458.3% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | CA$-19.33K | CA$4.88 Million | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2006 | -0.35x | CA$-589.28K | CA$1.68 Million | ▼ -252.5% |
| 2005 | -0.10x | CA$-355.73K | CA$3.57 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2004 | -0.19x | CA$-186.97K | CA$977.64K | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2003 | -0.50x | CA$-783.38K | CA$1.57 Million | ▼ -234.6% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | CA$-162.29K | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -225.0% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | CA$34.95K | CA$293.04K | ▲ +111.8% |
| 2000 | -1.01x | CA$-137.55K | CA$136.01K | ▲ +70.0% |
| 1999 | -3.37x | CA$-244.26K | CA$72.39K | ▼ -605.3% |
| 1998 | -0.48x | CA$-134.03K | CA$280.17K | ▲ +90.7% |
| 1997 | -5.14x | CA$-208.71K | CA$40.61K | — |