Orezone Gold Corp (ORE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Orezone Gold Corp (ORE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.23x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$169.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$739.50 Million) in one year. See Orezone Gold Corp financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Orezone Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Orezone Gold Corp across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Orezone Gold Corp cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Orezone Gold Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Orezone Gold Corp. Check how high is Orezone Gold Corp's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.34x | CA$87.84 Million | CA$255.87 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$57.70 Million | CA$184.57 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2023 | 0.46x | CA$79.95 Million | CA$173.72 Million | ▲ +1172.3% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$6.58 Million | CA$181.95 Million | ▲ +152.7% |
| 2021 | -0.07x | CA$-5.94 Million | CA$86.62 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2020 | -5.26x | CA$-17.33 Million | CA$3.30 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2019 | -5.39x | CA$-20.94 Million | CA$3.89 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2018 | -3.97x | CA$-11.94 Million | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +71.7% |
| 2017 | -14.00x | CA$-8.54 Million | CA$610.47K | ▼ -1362.1% |
| 2016 | -0.96x | CA$-4.22 Million | CA$4.41 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2015 | -2.00x | CA$-7.02 Million | CA$3.51 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2014 | -6.93x | CA$-8.96 Million | CA$1.29 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2013 | -34.49x | CA$-11.76 Million | CA$341.05K | ▼ -161.4% |
| 2012 | -13.19x | CA$-24.74 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2011 | -20.11x | CA$-28.51 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▼ -1408.3% |
| 2010 | -1.33x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$912.89K | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2009 | -2.66x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$482.05K | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2008 | -8.22x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$472.26K | ▼ -207458.3% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | CA$-19.33K | CA$4.88 Million | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2006 | -0.35x | CA$-589.28K | CA$1.68 Million | ▼ -252.5% |
| 2005 | -0.10x | CA$-355.73K | CA$3.57 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2004 | -0.19x | CA$-186.97K | CA$977.64K | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2003 | -0.50x | CA$-783.38K | CA$1.57 Million | ▼ -234.6% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | CA$-162.29K | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -225.0% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | CA$34.95K | CA$293.04K | ▲ +111.8% |
| 2000 | -1.01x | CA$-137.55K | CA$136.01K | ▲ +70.0% |
| 1999 | -3.37x | CA$-244.26K | CA$72.39K | ▼ -605.3% |
| 1998 | -0.48x | CA$-134.03K | CA$280.17K | ▲ +90.7% |
| 1997 | -5.14x | CA$-208.71K | CA$40.61K | — |