Premium Brands Holdings Corporation (PBH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Premium Brands Holdings Corporation (PBH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-6.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.04 Billion) in one year. See Premium Brands Holdings Corporation leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Premium Brands Holdings Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Premium Brands Holdings Corporation across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Premium Brands Holdings Corporation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Premium Brands Holdings Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Premium Brands Holdings Corporation. Check PBH cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | CA$93.60 Million | CA$4.29 Billion | ▼ -65.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | CA$253.10 Million | CA$4.03 Billion | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | CA$433.90 Million | CA$3.39 Billion | ▲ +332.9% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | CA$96.50 Million | CA$3.27 Billion | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | CA$66.30 Million | CA$2.63 Billion | ▼ -78.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$227.30 Million | CA$1.94 Billion | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$164.20 Million | CA$1.87 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$135.90 Million | CA$1.65 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | CA$85.90 Million | CA$970.10 Million | ▼ -58.3% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | CA$149.90 Million | CA$705.30 Million | ▲ +76.6% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | CA$67.35 Million | CA$559.61 Million | ▲ +218.0% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$21.34 Million | CA$563.92 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | CA$15.16 Million | CA$480.67 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | CA$50.83 Million | CA$422.11 Million | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$29.52 Million | CA$449.11 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | CA$33.81 Million | CA$251.76 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | CA$26.63 Million | CA$213.55 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | CA$33.91 Million | CA$168.44 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2007 | 0.21x | CA$31.85 Million | CA$149.08 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2006 | 0.46x | CA$17.88 Million | CA$39.21 Million | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | CA$10.15 Million | CA$43.30 Million | ▲ +285.6% |
| 2004 | -0.13x | CA$-8.11 Million | CA$64.23 Million | ▼ -610.0% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$2.19 Million | CA$88.25 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | CA$2.39 Million | CA$101.17 Million | ▲ +128.0% |
| 2001 | -0.08x | CA$-8.72 Million | CA$103.26 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | CA$-15.09 Million | CA$171.60 Million | ▼ -1533.0% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | CA$700.00K | CA$114.10 Million | ▼ -97.2% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | CA$14.20 Million | CA$64.10 Million | ▲ +352.0% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | CA$-3.20 Million | CA$36.40 Million | ▲ +13.6% |
| 1996 | -0.10x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$29.50 Million | — |