Polaris Infrastructure Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Polaris Infrastructure Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Polaris Infrastructure Inc (PIF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$8.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$294.28 Million) in one year. Check Polaris Infrastructure Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Polaris Infrastructure Inc (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Polaris Infrastructure Inc from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Polaris Infrastructure Inc across 26 annual periods. Check Polaris Infrastructure Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Polaris Infrastructure Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Polaris Infrastructure Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Polaris Infrastructure Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Polaris Infrastructure Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | CA$34.39 Million | CA$292.16 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$35.05 Million | CA$402.58 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | CA$43.96 Million | CA$249.47 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | CA$33.51 Million | CA$264.89 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | CA$41.13 Million | CA$241.88 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | CA$40.31 Million | CA$264.35 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | CA$44.61 Million | CA$256.52 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | CA$37.41 Million | CA$269.41 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | CA$34.56 Million | CA$220.05 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | CA$25.42 Million | CA$214.59 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | CA$25.59 Million | CA$212.97 Million | ▲ +159.2% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | CA$13.16 Million | CA$283.89 Million | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | CA$8.42 Million | CA$295.54 Million | ▲ +338.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | CA$-3.53 Million | CA$294.54 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2011 | -0.06x | CA$-14.34 Million | CA$248.32 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | CA$-14.41 Million | CA$129.24 Million | ▲ +93.6% |
| 2009 | -1.74x | CA$-27.89 Million | CA$16.00 Million | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2008 | -4.55x | CA$-50.95K | CA$11.20K | ▼ -182.5% |
| 2007 | -1.61x | CA$-31.73K | CA$19.70K | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2006 | -37.01x | CA$-385.06K | CA$10.40K | ▼ -16176.1% |
| 2005 | -0.23x | CA$-77.60K | CA$341.24K | ▼ -305.6% |
| 2004 | -0.06x | CA$-33.20K | CA$592.11K | ▼ -38871.6% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | CA$-74.20 | CA$515.69K | ▼ -166.0% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | CA$97.04 | CA$445.44K | ▲ +111.9% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | CA$-723.16 | CA$394.36K | ▲ +94.3% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | CA$-12.84K | CA$398.93K | — |