Polaris Infrastructure Inc (PIF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Polaris Infrastructure Inc (PIF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$8.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$294.28 Million) in one year. See PIF free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Polaris Infrastructure Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Polaris Infrastructure Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore Polaris Infrastructure Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Polaris Infrastructure Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Polaris Infrastructure Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Polaris Infrastructure Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | CA$34.39 Million | CA$292.16 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$35.05 Million | CA$402.58 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | CA$43.96 Million | CA$249.47 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | CA$33.51 Million | CA$264.89 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | CA$41.13 Million | CA$241.88 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | CA$40.31 Million | CA$264.35 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | CA$44.61 Million | CA$256.52 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | CA$37.41 Million | CA$269.41 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | CA$34.56 Million | CA$220.05 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | CA$25.42 Million | CA$214.59 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | CA$25.59 Million | CA$212.97 Million | ▲ +159.2% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | CA$13.16 Million | CA$283.89 Million | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | CA$8.42 Million | CA$295.54 Million | ▲ +338.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | CA$-3.53 Million | CA$294.54 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2011 | -0.06x | CA$-14.34 Million | CA$248.32 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | CA$-14.41 Million | CA$129.24 Million | ▲ +93.6% |
| 2009 | -1.74x | CA$-27.89 Million | CA$16.00 Million | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2008 | -4.55x | CA$-50.95K | CA$11.20K | ▼ -182.5% |
| 2007 | -1.61x | CA$-31.73K | CA$19.70K | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2006 | -37.01x | CA$-385.06K | CA$10.40K | ▼ -16176.1% |
| 2005 | -0.23x | CA$-77.60K | CA$341.24K | ▼ -305.6% |
| 2004 | -0.06x | CA$-33.20K | CA$592.11K | ▼ -38871.6% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | CA$-74.20 | CA$515.69K | ▼ -166.0% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | CA$97.04 | CA$445.44K | ▲ +111.9% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | CA$-723.16 | CA$394.36K | ▲ +94.3% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | CA$-12.84K | CA$398.93K | — |