Pinetree Capital Ltd (PNP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pinetree Capital Ltd (PNP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.42x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.73 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.93 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Pinetree Capital Ltd to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pinetree Capital Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pinetree Capital Ltd across 30 annual periods. Also explore Pinetree Capital Ltd total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pinetree Capital Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pinetree Capital Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PNP company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.14x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$1.81 Million | ▼ -141.4% |
| 2024 | 5.18x | CA$2.96 Million | CA$571.00K | ▲ +150.4% |
| 2023 | -10.28x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$377.00K | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2022 | -8.79x | CA$-3.89 Million | CA$443.00K | ▲ +66.8% |
| 2021 | -26.48x | CA$-10.91 Million | CA$412.00K | ▼ -99.6% |
| 2020 | -13.27x | CA$-5.08 Million | CA$383.00K | ▼ -318.1% |
| 2019 | -3.17x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$329.00K | ▼ -324.9% |
| 2018 | -0.75x | CA$-295.00K | CA$395.00K | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2017 | -13.66x | CA$-5.35 Million | CA$392.00K | ▼ -210.8% |
| 2016 | 12.32x | CA$4.62 Million | CA$375.00K | ▲ +182.8% |
| 2015 | 4.36x | CA$47.78 Million | CA$10.97 Million | ▲ +2974.6% |
| 2014 | -0.15x | CA$-8.73 Million | CA$57.59 Million | ▼ -175.6% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | CA$10.48 Million | CA$52.26 Million | ▲ +4292.9% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | CA$376.00K | CA$82.40 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2011 | -0.80x | CA$-70.57 Million | CA$87.99 Million | ▼ -1203.7% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | CA$-10.79 Million | CA$175.39 Million | ▼ -125.2% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | CA$9.98 Million | CA$40.87 Million | ▲ +144.1% |
| 2008 | -0.55x | CA$-15.05 Million | CA$27.19 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2007 | -0.42x | CA$-60.44 Million | CA$143.25 Million | ▼ -465.9% |
| 2006 | -0.07x | CA$-13.87 Million | CA$186.00 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2005 | -0.06x | CA$-3.73 Million | CA$65.55 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$27.47 Million | ▼ -162.3% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | CA$2.19 Million | CA$32.80 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | CA$1.47 Million | CA$9.25 Million | ▲ +7209.9% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | CA$16.80K | CA$7.70 Million | ▼ -98.2% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | CA$1.34 Million | CA$11.09 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | CA$700.00K | CA$3.70 Million | ▲ +115.1% |
| 1998 | -1.25x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$800.00K | ▲ +37.5% |
| 1997 | -2.00x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -292.0% |
| 1996 | 1.04x | CA$2.50 Million | CA$2.40 Million | — |