Petrus Resources Ltd (PRQ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Petrus Resources Ltd (PRQ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$16.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$160.84 Million) in one year. See Petrus Resources Ltd financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Petrus Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Petrus Resources Ltd across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Petrus Resources Ltd (PRQ) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Petrus Resources Ltd (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Petrus Resources Ltd. Check Petrus Resources Ltd cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.41x | CA$47.15 Million | CA$115.60 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | CA$58.73 Million | CA$116.74 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2023 | 0.61x | CA$74.37 Million | CA$122.68 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 2022 | 0.88x | CA$100.61 Million | CA$114.42 Million | ▲ +225.9% |
| 2021 | 0.27x | CA$32.99 Million | CA$122.27 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | CA$28.92 Million | CA$168.28 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$27.82 Million | CA$182.53 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$28.42 Million | CA$193.67 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | CA$45.93 Million | CA$202.72 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | CA$41.85 Million | CA$188.70 Million | ▲ +344.7% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | CA$15.53 Million | CA$311.24 Million | ▲ +101.4% |
| 2014 | -3.66x | CA$-563.00K | CA$154.00K | ▼ -22874.9% |
| 2013 | -0.02x | CA$-257.00K | CA$16.15 Million | ▲ +67.7% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | CA$-798.19K | CA$16.21 Million | ▼ -160.2% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | CA$1.39 Million | CA$16.93 Million | ▲ +1314.6% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | CA$-109.98K | CA$16.32 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2009 | -0.14x | CA$-2.27 Million | CA$16.30 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2008 | -0.19x | CA$-3.73 Million | CA$19.68 Million | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2007 | -0.83x | CA$-855.76K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2006 | -2.16x | CA$-279.74K | CA$129.33K | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2005 | -4.89x | CA$-260.48K | CA$53.24K | ▼ -68.1% |
| 2004 | -2.91x | CA$-363.13K | CA$124.77K | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2003 | -2.93x | CA$-242.89K | CA$82.79K | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2002 | -5.54x | CA$-265.55K | CA$47.94K | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2001 | -4.35x | CA$-290.99K | CA$66.83K | — |