Pulse Seismic Inc (PSD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pulse Seismic Inc (PSD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.21x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.16 Million) in one year. See PSD free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pulse Seismic Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pulse Seismic Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore PSD shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pulse Seismic Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pulse Seismic Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Pulse Seismic Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.41x | CA$14.20 Million | CA$3.22 Million | ▲ +192.1% |
| 2023 | 1.51x | CA$23.52 Million | CA$15.59 Million | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2022 | 6.95x | CA$11.99 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +104.2% |
| 2021 | 3.40x | CA$29.80 Million | CA$8.76 Million | ▲ +2708.0% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$3.81 Million | CA$31.48 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | CA$8.61 Million | CA$37.83 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2018 | -0.90x | CA$-3.25 Million | CA$3.61 Million | ▼ -132.3% |
| 2017 | 2.79x | CA$38.76 Million | CA$13.88 Million | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2016 | 1.50x | CA$9.47 Million | CA$6.31 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2015 | 1.85x | CA$17.09 Million | CA$9.23 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2014 | 1.64x | CA$27.98 Million | CA$17.08 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2013 | 1.10x | CA$35.12 Million | CA$32.05 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2012 | 1.09x | CA$71.87 Million | CA$65.90 Million | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | CA$37.20 Million | CA$67.61 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | CA$29.66 Million | CA$72.61 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | CA$18.85 Million | CA$34.87 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2008 | 0.92x | CA$42.63 Million | CA$46.09 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | CA$23.27 Million | CA$45.30 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2006 | 0.53x | CA$28.65 Million | CA$54.24 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | CA$30.86 Million | CA$47.14 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2004 | 0.98x | CA$30.42 Million | CA$30.92 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2003 | 0.64x | CA$29.01 Million | CA$45.21 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2002 | 0.56x | CA$22.97 Million | CA$40.97 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2001 | 2.14x | CA$17.30 Million | CA$8.10 Million | ▲ +185.6% |
| 2000 | 0.75x | CA$10.16 Million | CA$13.59 Million | ▲ +1094.0% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | CA$452.04K | CA$7.22 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 1998 | -22.83x | CA$-496.55K | CA$21.75K | ▼ -1216.0% |
| 1997 | -1.73x | CA$-352.53K | CA$203.24K | ▼ -86.5% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$1.20 Million | — |