Pulse Seismic Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pulse Seismic Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Pulse Seismic Inc (PSD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.21x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.16 Million) in one year. Check PSD cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Pulse Seismic Inc (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Pulse Seismic Inc from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Pulse Seismic Inc across 29 annual periods. Check PSD cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Pulse Seismic Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Pulse Seismic Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pulse Seismic Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Pulse Seismic Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.41x | CA$14.20 Million | CA$3.22 Million | ▲ +192.1% |
| 2023 | 1.51x | CA$23.52 Million | CA$15.59 Million | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2022 | 6.95x | CA$11.99 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +104.2% |
| 2021 | 3.40x | CA$29.80 Million | CA$8.76 Million | ▲ +2708.0% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$3.81 Million | CA$31.48 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | CA$8.61 Million | CA$37.83 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2018 | -0.90x | CA$-3.25 Million | CA$3.61 Million | ▼ -132.3% |
| 2017 | 2.79x | CA$38.76 Million | CA$13.88 Million | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2016 | 1.50x | CA$9.47 Million | CA$6.31 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2015 | 1.85x | CA$17.09 Million | CA$9.23 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2014 | 1.64x | CA$27.98 Million | CA$17.08 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2013 | 1.10x | CA$35.12 Million | CA$32.05 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2012 | 1.09x | CA$71.87 Million | CA$65.90 Million | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | CA$37.20 Million | CA$67.61 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | CA$29.66 Million | CA$72.61 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | CA$18.85 Million | CA$34.87 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2008 | 0.92x | CA$42.63 Million | CA$46.09 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | CA$23.27 Million | CA$45.30 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2006 | 0.53x | CA$28.65 Million | CA$54.24 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | CA$30.86 Million | CA$47.14 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2004 | 0.98x | CA$30.42 Million | CA$30.92 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2003 | 0.64x | CA$29.01 Million | CA$45.21 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2002 | 0.56x | CA$22.97 Million | CA$40.97 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2001 | 2.14x | CA$17.30 Million | CA$8.10 Million | ▲ +185.6% |
| 2000 | 0.75x | CA$10.16 Million | CA$13.59 Million | ▲ +1094.0% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | CA$452.04K | CA$7.22 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 1998 | -22.83x | CA$-496.55K | CA$21.75K | ▼ -1216.0% |
| 1997 | -1.73x | CA$-352.53K | CA$203.24K | ▼ -86.5% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$1.20 Million | — |