Pulse Seismic Inc (PSD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pulse Seismic Inc (PSD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.21x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.16 Million) in one year. Explore PSD strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pulse Seismic Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pulse Seismic Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore PSD total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pulse Seismic Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pulse Seismic Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Pulse Seismic Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.41x | CA$14.20 Million | CA$3.22 Million | ▲ +192.1% |
| 2023 | 1.51x | CA$23.52 Million | CA$15.59 Million | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2022 | 6.95x | CA$11.99 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +104.2% |
| 2021 | 3.40x | CA$29.80 Million | CA$8.76 Million | ▲ +2708.0% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$3.81 Million | CA$31.48 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | CA$8.61 Million | CA$37.83 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2018 | -0.90x | CA$-3.25 Million | CA$3.61 Million | ▼ -132.3% |
| 2017 | 2.79x | CA$38.76 Million | CA$13.88 Million | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2016 | 1.50x | CA$9.47 Million | CA$6.31 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2015 | 1.85x | CA$17.09 Million | CA$9.23 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2014 | 1.64x | CA$27.98 Million | CA$17.08 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2013 | 1.10x | CA$35.12 Million | CA$32.05 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2012 | 1.09x | CA$71.87 Million | CA$65.90 Million | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | CA$37.20 Million | CA$67.61 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | CA$29.66 Million | CA$72.61 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | CA$18.85 Million | CA$34.87 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2008 | 0.92x | CA$42.63 Million | CA$46.09 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | CA$23.27 Million | CA$45.30 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2006 | 0.53x | CA$28.65 Million | CA$54.24 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | CA$30.86 Million | CA$47.14 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2004 | 0.98x | CA$30.42 Million | CA$30.92 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2003 | 0.64x | CA$29.01 Million | CA$45.21 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2002 | 0.56x | CA$22.97 Million | CA$40.97 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2001 | 2.14x | CA$17.30 Million | CA$8.10 Million | ▲ +185.6% |
| 2000 | 0.75x | CA$10.16 Million | CA$13.59 Million | ▲ +1094.0% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | CA$452.04K | CA$7.22 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 1998 | -22.83x | CA$-496.55K | CA$21.75K | ▼ -1216.0% |
| 1997 | -1.73x | CA$-352.53K | CA$203.24K | ▼ -86.5% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$1.20 Million | — |