Pulse Seismic Inc (PSD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pulse Seismic Inc (PSD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.21x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.16 Million) in one year. See PSD financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pulse Seismic Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pulse Seismic Inc across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Pulse Seismic Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pulse Seismic Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pulse Seismic Inc. Check earnings quality score of Pulse Seismic Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.41x | CA$14.20 Million | CA$3.22 Million | ▲ +192.1% |
| 2023 | 1.51x | CA$23.52 Million | CA$15.59 Million | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2022 | 6.95x | CA$11.99 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +104.2% |
| 2021 | 3.40x | CA$29.80 Million | CA$8.76 Million | ▲ +2708.0% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$3.81 Million | CA$31.48 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | CA$8.61 Million | CA$37.83 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2018 | -0.90x | CA$-3.25 Million | CA$3.61 Million | ▼ -132.3% |
| 2017 | 2.79x | CA$38.76 Million | CA$13.88 Million | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2016 | 1.50x | CA$9.47 Million | CA$6.31 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2015 | 1.85x | CA$17.09 Million | CA$9.23 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2014 | 1.64x | CA$27.98 Million | CA$17.08 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2013 | 1.10x | CA$35.12 Million | CA$32.05 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2012 | 1.09x | CA$71.87 Million | CA$65.90 Million | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | CA$37.20 Million | CA$67.61 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | CA$29.66 Million | CA$72.61 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | CA$18.85 Million | CA$34.87 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2008 | 0.92x | CA$42.63 Million | CA$46.09 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | CA$23.27 Million | CA$45.30 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2006 | 0.53x | CA$28.65 Million | CA$54.24 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | CA$30.86 Million | CA$47.14 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2004 | 0.98x | CA$30.42 Million | CA$30.92 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2003 | 0.64x | CA$29.01 Million | CA$45.21 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2002 | 0.56x | CA$22.97 Million | CA$40.97 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2001 | 2.14x | CA$17.30 Million | CA$8.10 Million | ▲ +185.6% |
| 2000 | 0.75x | CA$10.16 Million | CA$13.59 Million | ▲ +1094.0% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | CA$452.04K | CA$7.22 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 1998 | -22.83x | CA$-496.55K | CA$21.75K | ▼ -1216.0% |
| 1997 | -1.73x | CA$-352.53K | CA$203.24K | ▼ -86.5% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$1.20 Million | — |