Richelieu Hardware Ltd. (RCH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Richelieu Hardware Ltd. (RCH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$16.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$487.82 Million) in one year. See Richelieu Hardware Ltd. (RCH) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Richelieu Hardware Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Richelieu Hardware Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Also explore RCH net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Richelieu Hardware Ltd. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Richelieu Hardware Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Richelieu Hardware Ltd..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | CA$199.14 Million | CA$479.24 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | CA$133.56 Million | CA$465.13 Million | ▼ -56.8% |
| 2023 | 0.67x | CA$270.66 Million | CA$406.81 Million | ▲ +953.6% |
| 2022 | -0.08x | CA$-36.17 Million | CA$464.04 Million | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | CA$104.41 Million | CA$295.24 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2020 | 0.67x | CA$145.71 Million | CA$216.60 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2019 | 0.85x | CA$88.17 Million | CA$103.17 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | CA$42.27 Million | CA$95.63 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2017 | 0.54x | CA$55.96 Million | CA$104.46 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2016 | 0.76x | CA$66.53 Million | CA$87.73 Million | ▲ +130.4% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | CA$27.31 Million | CA$82.98 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2014 | 0.52x | CA$40.47 Million | CA$77.17 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2013 | 0.77x | CA$48.37 Million | CA$63.21 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2012 | 0.74x | CA$45.62 Million | CA$61.93 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | CA$38.53 Million | CA$63.16 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2010 | 0.56x | CA$35.36 Million | CA$63.52 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2009 | 1.34x | CA$57.37 Million | CA$42.86 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2008 | 0.97x | CA$41.22 Million | CA$42.41 Million | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | CA$23.55 Million | CA$47.17 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2006 | 0.53x | CA$29.53 Million | CA$56.24 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2005 | 0.56x | CA$21.56 Million | CA$38.74 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2004 | 0.64x | CA$27.33 Million | CA$42.50 Million | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2003 | 0.49x | CA$19.22 Million | CA$39.58 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2002 | 0.45x | CA$18.28 Million | CA$40.56 Million | ▲ +115.4% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | CA$9.39 Million | CA$44.84 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | CA$9.78 Million | CA$44.52 Million | ▼ -25.4% |
| 1999 | 0.29x | CA$8.60 Million | CA$29.20 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | CA$8.70 Million | CA$33.50 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | CA$5.80 Million | CA$18.40 Million | ▲ +377.3% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | CA$1.40 Million | CA$21.20 Million | — |