Rio2 Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rio2 Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Rio2 Ltd (RIO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$32.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$345.10 Million) in one year. Check Rio2 Ltd (RIO) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Rio2 Ltd (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Rio2 Ltd from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Rio2 Ltd across 25 annual periods. Check Rio2 Ltd (RIO) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Rio2 Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Rio2 Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rio2 Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RIO operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | CA$89.28 Million | CA$345.10 Million | ▲ +204.7% |
| 2024 | -0.25x | CA$-12.03 Million | CA$48.69 Million | ▼ -2525.8% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | CA$-331.23K | CA$35.21 Million | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | CA$-3.87 Million | CA$33.23 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2021 | -1.27x | CA$-9.33 Million | CA$7.33 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2020 | -1.33x | CA$-8.45 Million | CA$6.37 Million | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2019 | -1.86x | CA$-5.50 Million | CA$2.96 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2018 | -1.55x | CA$-2.76 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▲ +85.6% |
| 2017 | -10.76x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$279.18K | ▼ -836.0% |
| 2016 | -1.15x | CA$-129.87K | CA$112.96K | ▼ -3780.6% |
| 2015 | -0.03x | CA$-19.98K | CA$674.38K | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2014 | -0.07x | CA$-51.78K | CA$718.47K | ▼ -191.6% |
| 2013 | -0.02x | CA$-17.52K | CA$708.98K | ▲ +89.6% |
| 2012 | -0.24x | CA$-149.54K | CA$630.49K | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2011 | -0.25x | CA$-139.48K | CA$558.12K | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2010 | -0.20x | CA$-68.38K | CA$338.77K | ▲ +73.8% |
| 2009 | -0.77x | CA$-194.89K | CA$252.59K | ▼ -88.7% |
| 2008 | -0.41x | CA$-100.20K | CA$245.10K | ▲ +59.0% |
| 2007 | -1.00x | CA$-200.38K | CA$200.89K | ▼ -46.5% |
| 2006 | -0.68x | CA$-126.62K | CA$186.02K | ▼ -140.0% |
| 2005 | -0.28x | CA$-53.96K | CA$190.23K | ▲ +93.4% |
| 2004 | -4.27x | CA$-255.60K | CA$59.90K | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2003 | -13.50x | CA$-309.23K | CA$22.91K | ▼ -788.1% |
| 2002 | -1.52x | CA$-128.42K | CA$84.50K | ▼ -133.7% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | CA$-26.39K | CA$40.58K | — |