Russel Metals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Russel Metals Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Russel Metals Inc. (RUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$105.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.10 Billion) in one year. Check RUS cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Russel Metals Inc. (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Russel Metals Inc. from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Russel Metals Inc. across 33 annual periods. Check Russel Metals Inc. (RUS) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Russel Metals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Russel Metals Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Russel Metals Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Russel Metals Inc. (RUS) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$199.50 Million | CA$1.10 Billion | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | CA$343.90 Million | CA$688.30 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | CA$461.70 Million | CA$930.20 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2022 | 0.38x | CA$359.90 Million | CA$947.60 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | CA$304.50 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2020 | 0.51x | CA$371.00 Million | CA$731.60 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | CA$249.70 Million | CA$980.30 Million | ▲ +225.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$87.90 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▲ +206.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-68.40 Million | CA$932.30 Million | ▼ -129.1% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | CA$172.00 Million | CA$683.20 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2015 | 0.50x | CA$366.20 Million | CA$738.10 Million | ▲ +1803.0% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | CA$28.10 Million | CA$1.08 Billion | ▼ -82.8% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | CA$141.70 Million | CA$935.40 Million | ▲ +92.5% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$76.00 Million | CA$965.70 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | CA$56.20 Million | CA$719.00 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | CA$80.70 Million | CA$639.00 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2009 | 0.45x | CA$291.10 Million | CA$642.50 Million | ▲ +516.9% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CA$56.60 Million | CA$770.60 Million | ▼ -81.9% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | CA$210.70 Million | CA$519.50 Million | ▲ +14361.2% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$527.60 Million | ▼ -101.2% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | CA$135.84 Million | CA$556.49 Million | ▲ +2358.5% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | CA$6.85 Million | CA$689.91 Million | ▼ -96.7% |
| 2003 | 0.30x | CA$152.28 Million | CA$506.78 Million | ▲ +402.1% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | CA$26.52 Million | CA$443.15 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2001 | 0.24x | CA$93.14 Million | CA$390.15 Million | ▲ +2136.5% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | CA$-5.23 Million | CA$446.40 Million | ▼ -103.4% |
| 1999 | 0.35x | CA$140.70 Million | CA$402.10 Million | ▲ +222.6% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | CA$46.00 Million | CA$424.10 Million | ▲ +466.4% |
| 1997 | -0.03x | CA$-14.40 Million | CA$486.50 Million | ▼ -156.8% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | CA$24.10 Million | CA$462.80 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | CA$65.40 Million | CA$418.40 Million | ▲ +243.6% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | CA$-58.80 Million | CA$540.20 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | CA$-32.10 Million | CA$545.20 Million | — |