Russel Metals Inc. (RUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Russel Metals Inc. (RUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$105.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.10 Billion) in one year. See Russel Metals Inc. free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Russel Metals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Russel Metals Inc. across 33 annual periods. Also explore RUS shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Russel Metals Inc. (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Russel Metals Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Russel Metals Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$199.50 Million | CA$1.10 Billion | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | CA$343.90 Million | CA$688.30 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | CA$461.70 Million | CA$930.20 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2022 | 0.38x | CA$359.90 Million | CA$947.60 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | CA$304.50 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2020 | 0.51x | CA$371.00 Million | CA$731.60 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | CA$249.70 Million | CA$980.30 Million | ▲ +225.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$87.90 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▲ +206.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-68.40 Million | CA$932.30 Million | ▼ -129.1% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | CA$172.00 Million | CA$683.20 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2015 | 0.50x | CA$366.20 Million | CA$738.10 Million | ▲ +1803.0% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | CA$28.10 Million | CA$1.08 Billion | ▼ -82.8% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | CA$141.70 Million | CA$935.40 Million | ▲ +92.5% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$76.00 Million | CA$965.70 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | CA$56.20 Million | CA$719.00 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | CA$80.70 Million | CA$639.00 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2009 | 0.45x | CA$291.10 Million | CA$642.50 Million | ▲ +516.9% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CA$56.60 Million | CA$770.60 Million | ▼ -81.9% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | CA$210.70 Million | CA$519.50 Million | ▲ +14361.2% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$527.60 Million | ▼ -101.2% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | CA$135.84 Million | CA$556.49 Million | ▲ +2358.5% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | CA$6.85 Million | CA$689.91 Million | ▼ -96.7% |
| 2003 | 0.30x | CA$152.28 Million | CA$506.78 Million | ▲ +402.1% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | CA$26.52 Million | CA$443.15 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2001 | 0.24x | CA$93.14 Million | CA$390.15 Million | ▲ +2136.5% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | CA$-5.23 Million | CA$446.40 Million | ▼ -103.4% |
| 1999 | 0.35x | CA$140.70 Million | CA$402.10 Million | ▲ +222.6% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | CA$46.00 Million | CA$424.10 Million | ▲ +466.4% |
| 1997 | -0.03x | CA$-14.40 Million | CA$486.50 Million | ▼ -156.8% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | CA$24.10 Million | CA$462.80 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | CA$65.40 Million | CA$418.40 Million | ▲ +243.6% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | CA$-58.80 Million | CA$540.20 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | CA$-32.10 Million | CA$545.20 Million | — |