Russel Metals Inc. (RUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Russel Metals Inc. (RUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$105.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.10 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Russel Metals Inc.'s assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Russel Metals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Russel Metals Inc. across 33 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Russel Metals Inc. for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Russel Metals Inc. (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Russel Metals Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Russel Metals Inc. (RUS) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$199.50 Million | CA$1.10 Billion | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | CA$343.90 Million | CA$688.30 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | CA$461.70 Million | CA$930.20 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2022 | 0.38x | CA$359.90 Million | CA$947.60 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | CA$304.50 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2020 | 0.51x | CA$371.00 Million | CA$731.60 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | CA$249.70 Million | CA$980.30 Million | ▲ +225.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$87.90 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▲ +206.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-68.40 Million | CA$932.30 Million | ▼ -129.1% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | CA$172.00 Million | CA$683.20 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2015 | 0.50x | CA$366.20 Million | CA$738.10 Million | ▲ +1803.0% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | CA$28.10 Million | CA$1.08 Billion | ▼ -82.8% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | CA$141.70 Million | CA$935.40 Million | ▲ +92.5% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$76.00 Million | CA$965.70 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | CA$56.20 Million | CA$719.00 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | CA$80.70 Million | CA$639.00 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2009 | 0.45x | CA$291.10 Million | CA$642.50 Million | ▲ +516.9% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CA$56.60 Million | CA$770.60 Million | ▼ -81.9% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | CA$210.70 Million | CA$519.50 Million | ▲ +14361.2% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$527.60 Million | ▼ -101.2% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | CA$135.84 Million | CA$556.49 Million | ▲ +2358.5% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | CA$6.85 Million | CA$689.91 Million | ▼ -96.7% |
| 2003 | 0.30x | CA$152.28 Million | CA$506.78 Million | ▲ +402.1% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | CA$26.52 Million | CA$443.15 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2001 | 0.24x | CA$93.14 Million | CA$390.15 Million | ▲ +2136.5% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | CA$-5.23 Million | CA$446.40 Million | ▼ -103.4% |
| 1999 | 0.35x | CA$140.70 Million | CA$402.10 Million | ▲ +222.6% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | CA$46.00 Million | CA$424.10 Million | ▲ +466.4% |
| 1997 | -0.03x | CA$-14.40 Million | CA$486.50 Million | ▼ -156.8% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | CA$24.10 Million | CA$462.80 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | CA$65.40 Million | CA$418.40 Million | ▲ +243.6% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | CA$-58.80 Million | CA$540.20 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | CA$-32.10 Million | CA$545.20 Million | — |