Sienna Senior Living Inc (SIA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.01x

Sienna Senior Living Inc (SIA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$19.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.72 Billion) in one year. Explore Sienna Senior Living Inc long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CA$19.60 Million
CAD

Total Liabilities

CA$1.72 Billion
CAD

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Sienna Senior Living Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2010–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Sienna Senior Living Inc across 15 annual periods. Also explore SIA total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sienna Senior Living Inc (2010–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sienna Senior Living Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SIA market cap overview.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CAD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.12x CA$159.91 Million CA$1.38 Billion ▲ +29.9%
2023 0.09x CA$117.99 Million CA$1.32 Billion ▲ +5.6%
2022 0.08x CA$105.28 Million CA$1.25 Billion ▲ +2.8%
2021 0.08x CA$98.97 Million CA$1.20 Billion ▲ +43.7%
2020 0.06x CA$70.43 Million CA$1.23 Billion ▼ -25.0%
2019 0.08x CA$88.71 Million CA$1.16 Billion ▲ +2.3%
2018 0.07x CA$88.44 Million CA$1.19 Billion ▲ +21.4%
2017 0.06x CA$61.38 Million CA$998.66 Million ▲ +17.9%
2016 0.05x CA$47.11 Million CA$904.01 Million ▼ -16.6%
2015 0.06x CA$48.39 Million CA$774.59 Million ▲ +88.7%
2014 0.03x CA$24.75 Million CA$747.58 Million ▼ -11.1%
2013 0.04x CA$26.98 Million CA$724.54 Million ▲ +2.1%
2012 0.04x CA$19.69 Million CA$539.91 Million ▲ +60.9%
2011 0.02x CA$10.51 Million CA$463.52 Million ▲ +492.7%
2010 0.00x CA$1.57 Million CA$411.56 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.