Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$47.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.19 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Stella-Jones Inc. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Stella-Jones Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Stella-Jones Inc. across 33 annual periods. Also explore Stella-Jones Inc. equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Stella-Jones Inc. (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Stella-Jones Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | CA$557.00 Million | CA$2.08 Billion | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$408.00 Million | CA$2.16 Billion | ▲ +262.6% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$107.00 Million | CA$2.06 Billion | ▼ -69.1% |
| 2022 | 0.17x | CA$255.00 Million | CA$1.52 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | CA$251.00 Million | CA$1.22 Billion | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | CA$178.00 Million | CA$1.05 Billion | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$89.92 Million | CA$992.75 Million | ▼ -44.8% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | CA$128.06 Million | CA$780.79 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | CA$301.11 Million | CA$670.43 Million | ▲ +131.1% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | CA$181.83 Million | CA$935.54 Million | ▲ +2895.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | CA$5.60 Million | CA$862.72 Million | ▼ -95.0% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | CA$76.93 Million | CA$595.23 Million | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | CA$104.22 Million | CA$499.74 Million | ▲ +256.2% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | CA$28.52 Million | CA$487.11 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | CA$32.79 Million | CA$285.14 Million | ▼ -66.1% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | CA$81.61 Million | CA$240.25 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | CA$40.48 Million | CA$190.82 Million | ▲ +1686.2% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | CA$-3.30 Million | CA$246.43 Million | ▼ -109.2% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | CA$16.98 Million | CA$117.10 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | CA$10.23 Million | CA$107.85 Million | ▲ +225.7% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | CA$2.10 Million | CA$72.26 Million | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | CA$8.90 Million | CA$48.91 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | CA$4.88 Million | CA$51.06 Million | ▼ -70.7% |
| 2002 | 0.33x | CA$11.12 Million | CA$34.08 Million | ▲ +375.5% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | CA$3.38 Million | CA$49.24 Million | ▲ +270.4% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$42.92 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 1999 | -0.06x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$28.00 Million | ▼ -115.1% |
| 1998 | 0.43x | CA$10.20 Million | CA$24.00 Million | ▲ +125.5% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | CA$4.90 Million | CA$26.00 Million | ▼ -47.6% |
| 1996 | 0.36x | CA$9.20 Million | CA$25.60 Million | ▲ +169.5% |
| 1995 | 0.13x | CA$4.40 Million | CA$33.00 Million | ▲ +208.1% |
| 1994 | -0.12x | CA$-4.70 Million | CA$38.10 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1993 | -0.23x | CA$-6.10 Million | CA$26.00 Million | — |