Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$611.07 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Skeena Resources Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Skeena Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Skeena Resources Ltd across 25 annual periods. Also explore Skeena Resources Ltd annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Skeena Resources Ltd (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Skeena Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Skeena Resources Ltd worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.10x | CA$-58.79 Million | CA$611.07 Million | ▲ +86.3% |
| 2024 | -0.70x | CA$-128.66 Million | CA$183.78 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2023 | -1.29x | CA$-90.60 Million | CA$70.45 Million | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2022 | -3.04x | CA$-93.38 Million | CA$30.75 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2021 | -3.96x | CA$-124.41 Million | CA$31.41 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 2020 | -2.30x | CA$-66.38 Million | CA$28.89 Million | ▼ -181.4% |
| 2019 | -0.82x | CA$-10.47 Million | CA$12.82 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2018 | -2.52x | CA$-15.11 Million | CA$5.99 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2017 | -2.95x | CA$-10.88 Million | CA$3.69 Million | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2016 | -6.10x | CA$-12.22 Million | CA$2.00 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2015 | -3.60x | CA$-8.65 Million | CA$2.40 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2014 | -3.41x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$483.63K | ▼ -853.8% |
| 2013 | -0.36x | CA$-149.67K | CA$418.17K | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2012 | -0.90x | CA$-213.37K | CA$237.10K | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2011 | -20.94x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$57.94K | ▼ -1321.5% |
| 2010 | -1.47x | CA$-397.98K | CA$270.12K | ▼ -2000.9% |
| 2009 | -0.07x | CA$-34.35K | CA$489.78K | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2008 | -0.17x | CA$-190.28K | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2007 | -1.52x | CA$-481.48K | CA$317.33K | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2006 | -8.55x | CA$-303.49K | CA$35.49K | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2005 | -4.93x | CA$-513.17K | CA$104.18K | ▼ -675.3% |
| 2004 | -0.64x | CA$-168.86K | CA$265.80K | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2003 | -4.18x | CA$-146.66K | CA$35.10K | ▼ -1644.8% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | CA$49.25K | CA$182.11K | ▲ +116.3% |
| 2001 | -1.66x | CA$-122.80K | CA$73.91K | — |