Skeena Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Skeena Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-15.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$951.63 Million) in one year. Check Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Skeena Resources Ltd (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Skeena Resources Ltd from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Skeena Resources Ltd across 25 annual periods. Check Skeena Resources Ltd total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Skeena Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Skeena Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Skeena Resources Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SKE cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.10x | CA$-58.79 Million | CA$611.07 Million | ▲ +86.3% |
| 2024 | -0.70x | CA$-128.66 Million | CA$183.78 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2023 | -1.29x | CA$-90.60 Million | CA$70.45 Million | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2022 | -3.04x | CA$-93.38 Million | CA$30.75 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2021 | -3.96x | CA$-124.41 Million | CA$31.41 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 2020 | -2.30x | CA$-66.38 Million | CA$28.89 Million | ▼ -181.4% |
| 2019 | -0.82x | CA$-10.47 Million | CA$12.82 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2018 | -2.52x | CA$-15.11 Million | CA$5.99 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2017 | -2.95x | CA$-10.88 Million | CA$3.69 Million | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2016 | -6.10x | CA$-12.22 Million | CA$2.00 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2015 | -3.60x | CA$-8.65 Million | CA$2.40 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2014 | -3.41x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$483.63K | ▼ -853.8% |
| 2013 | -0.36x | CA$-149.67K | CA$418.17K | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2012 | -0.90x | CA$-213.37K | CA$237.10K | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2011 | -20.94x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$57.94K | ▼ -1321.5% |
| 2010 | -1.47x | CA$-397.98K | CA$270.12K | ▼ -2000.9% |
| 2009 | -0.07x | CA$-34.35K | CA$489.78K | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2008 | -0.17x | CA$-190.28K | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2007 | -1.52x | CA$-481.48K | CA$317.33K | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2006 | -8.55x | CA$-303.49K | CA$35.49K | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2005 | -4.93x | CA$-513.17K | CA$104.18K | ▼ -675.3% |
| 2004 | -0.64x | CA$-168.86K | CA$265.80K | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2003 | -4.18x | CA$-146.66K | CA$35.10K | ▼ -1644.8% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | CA$49.25K | CA$182.11K | ▲ +116.3% |
| 2001 | -1.66x | CA$-122.80K | CA$73.91K | — |