Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-15.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$951.63 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Skeena Resources Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Skeena Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Skeena Resources Ltd across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Skeena Resources Ltd operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Skeena Resources Ltd (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Skeena Resources Ltd. Check SKE cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.10x | CA$-58.79 Million | CA$611.07 Million | ▲ +86.3% |
| 2024 | -0.70x | CA$-128.66 Million | CA$183.78 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2023 | -1.29x | CA$-90.60 Million | CA$70.45 Million | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2022 | -3.04x | CA$-93.38 Million | CA$30.75 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2021 | -3.96x | CA$-124.41 Million | CA$31.41 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 2020 | -2.30x | CA$-66.38 Million | CA$28.89 Million | ▼ -181.4% |
| 2019 | -0.82x | CA$-10.47 Million | CA$12.82 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2018 | -2.52x | CA$-15.11 Million | CA$5.99 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2017 | -2.95x | CA$-10.88 Million | CA$3.69 Million | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2016 | -6.10x | CA$-12.22 Million | CA$2.00 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2015 | -3.60x | CA$-8.65 Million | CA$2.40 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2014 | -3.41x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$483.63K | ▼ -853.8% |
| 2013 | -0.36x | CA$-149.67K | CA$418.17K | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2012 | -0.90x | CA$-213.37K | CA$237.10K | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2011 | -20.94x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$57.94K | ▼ -1321.5% |
| 2010 | -1.47x | CA$-397.98K | CA$270.12K | ▼ -2000.9% |
| 2009 | -0.07x | CA$-34.35K | CA$489.78K | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2008 | -0.17x | CA$-190.28K | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2007 | -1.52x | CA$-481.48K | CA$317.33K | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2006 | -8.55x | CA$-303.49K | CA$35.49K | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2005 | -4.93x | CA$-513.17K | CA$104.18K | ▼ -675.3% |
| 2004 | -0.64x | CA$-168.86K | CA$265.80K | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2003 | -4.18x | CA$-146.66K | CA$35.10K | ▼ -1644.8% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | CA$49.25K | CA$182.11K | ▲ +116.3% |
| 2001 | -1.66x | CA$-122.80K | CA$73.91K | — |