Sierra Metals Inc. (SMT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sierra Metals Inc. (SMT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$27.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$269.76 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Sierra Metals Inc. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sierra Metals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sierra Metals Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Sierra Metals Inc. (SMT) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sierra Metals Inc. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sierra Metals Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Sierra Metals Inc. (SMT) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.25x | CA$65.15 Million | CA$259.88 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | CA$50.19 Million | CA$204.26 Million | ▲ +557.2% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$7.26 Million | CA$194.25 Million | ▼ -90.1% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | CA$72.25 Million | CA$192.19 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | CA$66.98 Million | CA$199.38 Million | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$39.59 Million | CA$199.43 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | CA$61.90 Million | CA$152.84 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | CA$54.47 Million | CA$159.92 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | CA$43.64 Million | CA$178.85 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$31.31 Million | CA$170.95 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | CA$60.07 Million | CA$189.96 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | CA$26.75 Million | CA$210.29 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | CA$58.45 Million | CA$222.73 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | CA$40.66 Million | CA$273.41 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 2010 | -0.47x | CA$-2.86 Million | CA$6.05 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2009 | -0.75x | CA$-5.16 Million | CA$6.84 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2008 | -0.56x | CA$-6.42 Million | CA$11.52 Million | ▼ -118.7% |
| 2007 | -0.25x | CA$-2.06 Million | CA$8.09 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2006 | -0.51x | CA$-3.64 Million | CA$7.19 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2005 | -1.06x | CA$-1.29 Million | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$667.97K | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2003 | -4.26x | CA$-671.59K | CA$157.54K | ▼ -270.0% |
| 2002 | -1.15x | CA$-80.78K | CA$70.12K | ▼ -2010.1% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | CA$-6.33K | CA$116.03K | ▲ +99.2% |
| 2000 | -6.50x | CA$-198.08K | CA$30.46K | ▼ -965.4% |
| 1999 | -0.61x | CA$-71.88K | CA$117.78K | ▲ +72.2% |
| 1998 | -2.20x | CA$-66.58K | CA$30.33K | ▼ -276.1% |
| 1997 | -0.58x | CA$-31.87K | CA$54.59K | ▲ +58.6% |
| 1996 | -1.41x | CA$-80.82K | CA$57.37K | — |