Sierra Metals Inc. (SMT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sierra Metals Inc. (SMT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$27.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$269.76 Million) in one year. Check Sierra Metals Inc. (SMT) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sierra Metals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sierra Metals Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Sierra Metals Inc. assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sierra Metals Inc. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sierra Metals Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SMT stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.25x | CA$65.15 Million | CA$259.88 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | CA$50.19 Million | CA$204.26 Million | ▲ +557.2% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$7.26 Million | CA$194.25 Million | ▼ -90.1% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | CA$72.25 Million | CA$192.19 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | CA$66.98 Million | CA$199.38 Million | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$39.59 Million | CA$199.43 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | CA$61.90 Million | CA$152.84 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | CA$54.47 Million | CA$159.92 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | CA$43.64 Million | CA$178.85 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$31.31 Million | CA$170.95 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | CA$60.07 Million | CA$189.96 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | CA$26.75 Million | CA$210.29 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | CA$58.45 Million | CA$222.73 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | CA$40.66 Million | CA$273.41 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 2010 | -0.47x | CA$-2.86 Million | CA$6.05 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2009 | -0.75x | CA$-5.16 Million | CA$6.84 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2008 | -0.56x | CA$-6.42 Million | CA$11.52 Million | ▼ -118.7% |
| 2007 | -0.25x | CA$-2.06 Million | CA$8.09 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2006 | -0.51x | CA$-3.64 Million | CA$7.19 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2005 | -1.06x | CA$-1.29 Million | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$667.97K | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2003 | -4.26x | CA$-671.59K | CA$157.54K | ▼ -270.0% |
| 2002 | -1.15x | CA$-80.78K | CA$70.12K | ▼ -2010.1% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | CA$-6.33K | CA$116.03K | ▲ +99.2% |
| 2000 | -6.50x | CA$-198.08K | CA$30.46K | ▼ -965.4% |
| 1999 | -0.61x | CA$-71.88K | CA$117.78K | ▲ +72.2% |
| 1998 | -2.20x | CA$-66.58K | CA$30.33K | ▼ -276.1% |
| 1997 | -0.58x | CA$-31.87K | CA$54.59K | ▲ +58.6% |
| 1996 | -1.41x | CA$-80.82K | CA$57.37K | — |