Sierra Metals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sierra Metals Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Sierra Metals Inc. (SMT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$27.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$269.76 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Sierra Metals Inc. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Sierra Metals Inc. (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Sierra Metals Inc. from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Sierra Metals Inc. across 29 annual periods. Check how high is Sierra Metals Inc.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Sierra Metals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Sierra Metals Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sierra Metals Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Sierra Metals Inc. cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.25x | CA$65.15 Million | CA$259.88 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | CA$50.19 Million | CA$204.26 Million | ▲ +557.2% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$7.26 Million | CA$194.25 Million | ▼ -90.1% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | CA$72.25 Million | CA$192.19 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | CA$66.98 Million | CA$199.38 Million | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$39.59 Million | CA$199.43 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | CA$61.90 Million | CA$152.84 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | CA$54.47 Million | CA$159.92 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | CA$43.64 Million | CA$178.85 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$31.31 Million | CA$170.95 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | CA$60.07 Million | CA$189.96 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | CA$26.75 Million | CA$210.29 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | CA$58.45 Million | CA$222.73 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | CA$40.66 Million | CA$273.41 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 2010 | -0.47x | CA$-2.86 Million | CA$6.05 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2009 | -0.75x | CA$-5.16 Million | CA$6.84 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2008 | -0.56x | CA$-6.42 Million | CA$11.52 Million | ▼ -118.7% |
| 2007 | -0.25x | CA$-2.06 Million | CA$8.09 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2006 | -0.51x | CA$-3.64 Million | CA$7.19 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2005 | -1.06x | CA$-1.29 Million | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$667.97K | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2003 | -4.26x | CA$-671.59K | CA$157.54K | ▼ -270.0% |
| 2002 | -1.15x | CA$-80.78K | CA$70.12K | ▼ -2010.1% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | CA$-6.33K | CA$116.03K | ▲ +99.2% |
| 2000 | -6.50x | CA$-198.08K | CA$30.46K | ▼ -965.4% |
| 1999 | -0.61x | CA$-71.88K | CA$117.78K | ▲ +72.2% |
| 1998 | -2.20x | CA$-66.58K | CA$30.33K | ▼ -276.1% |
| 1997 | -0.58x | CA$-31.87K | CA$54.59K | ▲ +58.6% |
| 1996 | -1.41x | CA$-80.82K | CA$57.37K | — |