Stantec Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Stantec Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Stantec Inc (STN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$118.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.80 Billion) in one year. Check Stantec Inc (STN) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Stantec Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Stantec Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Stantec Inc across 31 annual periods. Check Stantec Inc (STN) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Stantec Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Stantec Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Stantec Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Stantec Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$862.90 Million | CA$4.72 Billion | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | CA$603.10 Million | CA$4.01 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | CA$520.00 Million | CA$3.32 Billion | ▲ +73.5% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | CA$304.30 Million | CA$3.37 Billion | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | CA$397.00 Million | CA$3.22 Billion | ▼ -49.8% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | CA$603.80 Million | CA$2.46 Billion | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | CA$452.50 Million | CA$2.68 Billion | ▲ +105.2% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$172.60 Million | CA$2.10 Billion | ▼ -38.2% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | CA$263.70 Million | CA$1.98 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | CA$286.49 Million | CA$2.31 Billion | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | CA$208.45 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | CA$209.69 Million | CA$873.40 Million | ▲ +634.7% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | CA$70.65 Million | CA$2.16 Billion | ▼ -90.8% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | CA$274.81 Million | CA$775.54 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | CA$181.24 Million | CA$737.11 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2011 | 0.16x | CA$114.76 Million | CA$700.21 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | CA$114.78 Million | CA$697.93 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | CA$99.98 Million | CA$575.97 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | CA$160.03 Million | CA$605.91 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | CA$87.50 Million | CA$370.86 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | CA$93.39 Million | CA$219.58 Million | ▲ +108.3% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | CA$57.31 Million | CA$280.73 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2004 | 0.46x | CA$77.35 Million | CA$166.69 Million | ▲ +356.1% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | CA$16.89 Million | CA$166.05 Million | ▼ -58.8% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | CA$35.95 Million | CA$145.68 Million | ▲ +101.7% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | CA$13.43 Million | CA$109.76 Million | ▼ -72.8% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | CA$39.10 Million | CA$86.93 Million | ▲ +344.0% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | CA$6.90 Million | CA$68.10 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | CA$12.00 Million | CA$56.60 Million | ▲ +3299.3% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | CA$300.00K | CA$48.10 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | CA$4.00 Million | CA$26.70 Million | — |