Taseko Mines Ltd (TKO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Taseko Mines Ltd (TKO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$92.03 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.75 Billion) in one year. See TKO free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Taseko Mines Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Taseko Mines Ltd across 30 annual periods. Also explore Taseko Mines Ltd net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Taseko Mines Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Taseko Mines Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TKO stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$146.12 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$232.62 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | CA$151.09 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | CA$81.27 Million | CA$922.27 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | CA$174.77 Million | CA$824.68 Million | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | CA$106.19 Million | CA$592.99 Million | ▲ +144.6% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | CA$42.64 Million | CA$582.31 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$94.08 Million | CA$625.65 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | CA$211.08 Million | CA$621.63 Million | ▲ +512.4% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | CA$33.85 Million | CA$610.50 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | CA$51.70 Million | CA$603.87 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | CA$50.57 Million | CA$570.27 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | CA$67.59 Million | CA$544.01 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | CA$68.19 Million | CA$550.87 Million | ▲ +1279.5% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$4.68 Million | CA$522.14 Million | ▼ -97.5% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | CA$94.08 Million | CA$261.35 Million | ▲ +420.8% |
| 2009 | -0.11x | CA$-26.75 Million | CA$238.40 Million | ▼ -136.9% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | CA$73.98 Million | CA$243.34 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2007 | 0.40x | CA$85.98 Million | CA$213.60 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2006 | 0.28x | CA$55.41 Million | CA$196.53 Million | ▲ +1921.5% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | CA$-2.51 Million | CA$161.89 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | CA$-5.29 Million | CA$125.03 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-2.82 Million | CA$36.55 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2002 | -0.11x | CA$-4.32 Million | CA$39.74 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2001 | -0.19x | CA$-6.61 Million | CA$35.63 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | CA$-5.08 Million | CA$33.40 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 1999 | -0.11x | CA$-5.70 Million | CA$52.20 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 1998 | -2.46x | CA$-5.90 Million | CA$2.40 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 1997 | -4.91x | CA$-15.70 Million | CA$3.20 Million | ▼ -140.3% |
| 1996 | -2.04x | CA$-4.90 Million | CA$2.40 Million | — |