Taseko Mines Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Taseko Mines Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Taseko Mines Ltd (TKO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$183.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.82 Billion) in one year. Check Taseko Mines Ltd (TKO) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Taseko Mines Ltd (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Taseko Mines Ltd from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Taseko Mines Ltd across 30 annual periods. Check Taseko Mines Ltd (TKO) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Taseko Mines Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Taseko Mines Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Taseko Mines Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TKO cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$146.12 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$232.62 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | CA$151.09 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | CA$81.27 Million | CA$922.27 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | CA$174.77 Million | CA$824.68 Million | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | CA$106.19 Million | CA$592.99 Million | ▲ +144.6% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | CA$42.64 Million | CA$582.31 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$94.08 Million | CA$625.65 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | CA$211.08 Million | CA$621.63 Million | ▲ +512.4% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | CA$33.85 Million | CA$610.50 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | CA$51.70 Million | CA$603.87 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | CA$50.57 Million | CA$570.27 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | CA$67.59 Million | CA$544.01 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | CA$68.19 Million | CA$550.87 Million | ▲ +1279.5% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$4.68 Million | CA$522.14 Million | ▼ -97.5% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | CA$94.08 Million | CA$261.35 Million | ▲ +420.8% |
| 2009 | -0.11x | CA$-26.75 Million | CA$238.40 Million | ▼ -136.9% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | CA$73.98 Million | CA$243.34 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2007 | 0.40x | CA$85.98 Million | CA$213.60 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2006 | 0.28x | CA$55.41 Million | CA$196.53 Million | ▲ +1921.5% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | CA$-2.51 Million | CA$161.89 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | CA$-5.29 Million | CA$125.03 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-2.82 Million | CA$36.55 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2002 | -0.11x | CA$-4.32 Million | CA$39.74 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2001 | -0.19x | CA$-6.61 Million | CA$35.63 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | CA$-5.08 Million | CA$33.40 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 1999 | -0.11x | CA$-5.70 Million | CA$52.20 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 1998 | -2.46x | CA$-5.90 Million | CA$2.40 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 1997 | -4.91x | CA$-15.70 Million | CA$3.20 Million | ▼ -140.3% |
| 1996 | -2.04x | CA$-4.90 Million | CA$2.40 Million | — |