Taseko Mines Ltd (TKO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Taseko Mines Ltd (TKO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$92.03 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.75 Billion) in one year. Explore TKO long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Taseko Mines Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Taseko Mines Ltd across 30 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Taseko Mines Ltd for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Taseko Mines Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Taseko Mines Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Taseko Mines Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$146.12 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$232.62 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | CA$151.09 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | CA$81.27 Million | CA$922.27 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | CA$174.77 Million | CA$824.68 Million | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | CA$106.19 Million | CA$592.99 Million | ▲ +144.6% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | CA$42.64 Million | CA$582.31 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$94.08 Million | CA$625.65 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | CA$211.08 Million | CA$621.63 Million | ▲ +512.4% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | CA$33.85 Million | CA$610.50 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | CA$51.70 Million | CA$603.87 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | CA$50.57 Million | CA$570.27 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | CA$67.59 Million | CA$544.01 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | CA$68.19 Million | CA$550.87 Million | ▲ +1279.5% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$4.68 Million | CA$522.14 Million | ▼ -97.5% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | CA$94.08 Million | CA$261.35 Million | ▲ +420.8% |
| 2009 | -0.11x | CA$-26.75 Million | CA$238.40 Million | ▼ -136.9% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | CA$73.98 Million | CA$243.34 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2007 | 0.40x | CA$85.98 Million | CA$213.60 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2006 | 0.28x | CA$55.41 Million | CA$196.53 Million | ▲ +1921.5% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | CA$-2.51 Million | CA$161.89 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | CA$-5.29 Million | CA$125.03 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-2.82 Million | CA$36.55 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2002 | -0.11x | CA$-4.32 Million | CA$39.74 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2001 | -0.19x | CA$-6.61 Million | CA$35.63 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | CA$-5.08 Million | CA$33.40 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 1999 | -0.11x | CA$-5.70 Million | CA$52.20 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 1998 | -2.46x | CA$-5.90 Million | CA$2.40 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 1997 | -4.91x | CA$-15.70 Million | CA$3.20 Million | ▼ -140.3% |
| 1996 | -2.04x | CA$-4.90 Million | CA$2.40 Million | — |