TRX Gold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TRX Gold Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. TRX Gold Corporation (TNX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of November 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$5.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$25.53 Million) in one year. Check TNX capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of TRX Gold Corporation (1998–2023)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of TRX Gold Corporation from 1998 to 2023. Historical debt coverage capacity for TRX Gold Corporation across 26 annual periods. Check TRX Gold Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
TRX Gold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2023)
TRX Gold Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2023. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TRX Gold Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TRX Gold Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.75x | CA$17.33 Million | CA$23.14 Million | ▲ +424.1% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$2.96 Million | CA$20.69 Million | ▲ +119.2% |
| 2021 | -0.74x | CA$-7.52 Million | CA$10.09 Million | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2020 | -0.49x | CA$-6.55 Million | CA$13.25 Million | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2019 | -0.26x | CA$-3.60 Million | CA$13.81 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$14.56 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | CA$-3.39 Million | CA$11.96 Million | ▼ -185.7% |
| 2016 | -0.10x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$14.73 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2015 | -0.13x | CA$-680.46K | CA$5.31 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2014 | -2.70x | CA$-3.21 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -283.9% |
| 2013 | -0.70x | CA$-3.93 Million | CA$5.57 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-4.75 Million | CA$12.59 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2011 | -0.58x | CA$-3.21 Million | CA$5.55 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2010 | -1.02x | CA$-2.37 Million | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2009 | -4.01x | CA$-2.50 Million | CA$624.67K | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2008 | -4.50x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$550.54K | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2007 | -3.65x | CA$-2.35 Million | CA$642.71K | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2006 | -2.90x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$647.44K | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2005 | -5.07x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$322.00K | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2004 | -3.00x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$605.05K | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2003 | -1.85x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$799.37K | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2002 | -1.13x | CA$-944.54K | CA$838.39K | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2001 | -1.25x | CA$-454.90K | CA$364.50K | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2000 | -0.57x | CA$-197.39K | CA$345.41K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1999 | -2.08x | CA$-423.50K | CA$203.18K | ▲ +86.2% |
| 1998 | -15.09x | CA$-804.66K | CA$53.31K | — |