TRX Gold Corporation (TNX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TRX Gold Corporation (TNX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of November 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$5.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$25.53 Million) in one year. See TNX free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TRX Gold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2023)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TRX Gold Corporation across 26 annual periods. Also explore TRX Gold Corporation net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TRX Gold Corporation (1998–2023)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TRX Gold Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TRX Gold Corporation (TNX) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.75x | CA$17.33 Million | CA$23.14 Million | ▲ +424.1% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$2.96 Million | CA$20.69 Million | ▲ +119.2% |
| 2021 | -0.74x | CA$-7.52 Million | CA$10.09 Million | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2020 | -0.49x | CA$-6.55 Million | CA$13.25 Million | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2019 | -0.26x | CA$-3.60 Million | CA$13.81 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$14.56 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | CA$-3.39 Million | CA$11.96 Million | ▼ -185.7% |
| 2016 | -0.10x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$14.73 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2015 | -0.13x | CA$-680.46K | CA$5.31 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2014 | -2.70x | CA$-3.21 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -283.9% |
| 2013 | -0.70x | CA$-3.93 Million | CA$5.57 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-4.75 Million | CA$12.59 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2011 | -0.58x | CA$-3.21 Million | CA$5.55 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2010 | -1.02x | CA$-2.37 Million | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2009 | -4.01x | CA$-2.50 Million | CA$624.67K | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2008 | -4.50x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$550.54K | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2007 | -3.65x | CA$-2.35 Million | CA$642.71K | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2006 | -2.90x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$647.44K | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2005 | -5.07x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$322.00K | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2004 | -3.00x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$605.05K | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2003 | -1.85x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$799.37K | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2002 | -1.13x | CA$-944.54K | CA$838.39K | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2001 | -1.25x | CA$-454.90K | CA$364.50K | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2000 | -0.57x | CA$-197.39K | CA$345.41K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1999 | -2.08x | CA$-423.50K | CA$203.18K | ▲ +86.2% |
| 1998 | -15.09x | CA$-804.66K | CA$53.31K | — |