Torex Gold Resources Inc (TXG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Torex Gold Resources Inc (TXG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.43x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$209.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$486.90 Million) in one year. See Torex Gold Resources Inc (TXG) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Torex Gold Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Torex Gold Resources Inc across 25 annual periods. Also explore Torex Gold Resources Inc (TXG) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Torex Gold Resources Inc (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Torex Gold Resources Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Torex Gold Resources Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79x | CA$472.12 Million | CA$597.71 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2024 | 0.88x | CA$449.50 Million | CA$508.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.88x | CA$300.80 Million | CA$340.70 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2022 | 1.35x | CA$408.10 Million | CA$303.20 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2021 | 1.28x | CA$330.00 Million | CA$258.50 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2020 | 1.12x | CA$342.10 Million | CA$306.30 Million | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2019 | 0.76x | CA$301.30 Million | CA$394.80 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2018 | 0.44x | CA$226.80 Million | CA$511.80 Million | ▲ +194.3% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$73.60 Million | CA$488.80 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | CA$167.39 Million | CA$522.49 Million | ▲ +520.8% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | CA$-34.33 Million | CA$450.93 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 2014 | -0.32x | CA$-25.83 Million | CA$80.79 Million | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2013 | -1.55x | CA$-52.89 Million | CA$34.08 Million | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2012 | -9.25x | CA$-53.42 Million | CA$5.77 Million | ▼ -1758.5% |
| 2011 | -0.50x | CA$-33.71 Million | CA$67.71 Million | ▼ -340.0% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | CA$-8.49 Million | CA$75.06 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2009 | -1.24x | CA$-621.75K | CA$500.37K | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2008 | -3.57x | CA$-53.47K | CA$14.96K | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2007 | -3.50x | CA$-59.51K | CA$17.02K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2006 | -10.21x | CA$-68.48K | CA$6.70K | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2005 | -11.29x | CA$-62.43K | CA$5.53K | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2004 | -35.90x | CA$-52.13K | CA$1.45K | ▼ -5528.0% |
| 2003 | -0.64x | CA$-35.82K | CA$56.14K | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2002 | -0.49x | CA$-24.38K | CA$50.05K | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2001 | -1.18x | CA$-46.92K | CA$39.79K | — |