West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-172.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.03 Billion) in one year. See WFG FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see West Fraser Timber Co Ltd operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd. Check how high is West Fraser Timber Co Ltd's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | CA$96.00 Million | CA$1.77 Billion | ▼ -84.8% |
| 2024 | 0.36x | CA$644.49 Million | CA$1.80 Billion | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2023 | 0.26x | CA$556.89 Million | CA$2.18 Billion | ▼ -71.5% |
| 2022 | 0.90x | CA$2.14 Billion | CA$2.38 Billion | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2021 | 1.26x | CA$3.46 Billion | CA$2.75 Billion | ▲ +117.1% |
| 2020 | 0.58x | CA$982.32 Million | CA$1.70 Billion | ▲ +1697.0% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | CA$54.08 Million | CA$1.68 Billion | ▼ -93.0% |
| 2018 | 0.46x | CA$644.04 Million | CA$1.39 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.49x | CA$691.10 Million | CA$1.42 Billion | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2016 | 0.49x | CA$492.63 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +159.4% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | CA$201.38 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | CA$409.81 Million | CA$1.24 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | CA$397.81 Million | CA$1.15 Billion | ▲ +120.5% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | CA$177.32 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +172.5% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | CA$64.13 Million | CA$1.11 Billion | ▼ -83.5% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | CA$397.19 Million | CA$1.14 Billion | ▲ +294.4% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | CA$100.68 Million | CA$1.14 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | CA$167.13 Million | CA$1.29 Billion | ▲ +176.9% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | CA$-245.67 Million | CA$1.46 Billion | ▼ -134.0% |
| 2006 | 0.50x | CA$756.19 Million | CA$1.53 Billion | ▲ +3011.3% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | CA$25.47 Million | CA$1.60 Billion | ▼ -90.9% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | CA$327.32 Million | CA$1.87 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2003 | 0.20x | CA$116.98 Million | CA$596.55 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2002 | 0.35x | CA$181.05 Million | CA$523.35 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2001 | 0.49x | CA$354.76 Million | CA$721.85 Million | ▲ +301.2% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | CA$108.33 Million | CA$884.38 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1999 | 0.30x | CA$258.02 Million | CA$855.19 Million | ▲ +159.6% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | CA$91.51 Million | CA$787.22 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | CA$162.96 Million | CA$836.48 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 1996 | 0.22x | CA$185.86 Million | CA$847.71 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | CA$135.79 Million | CA$880.71 Million | — |