Willow Biosciences Inc (WLLW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Willow Biosciences Inc (WLLW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-38.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.00 Million) in one year. See Willow Biosciences Inc (WLLW) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Willow Biosciences Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Willow Biosciences Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Willow Biosciences Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Willow Biosciences Inc (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Willow Biosciences Inc. Check Willow Biosciences Inc (WLLW) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.24x | CA$-3.72 Million | CA$2.99 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2023 | -3.37x | CA$-10.92 Million | CA$3.24 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2022 | -7.81x | CA$-13.86 Million | CA$1.77 Million | ▼ -128.7% |
| 2021 | -3.42x | CA$-18.23 Million | CA$5.33 Million | ▼ -499.5% |
| 2020 | -0.57x | CA$-12.78 Million | CA$22.42 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2019 | -0.77x | CA$-9.16 Million | CA$11.87 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2018 | -10.10x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$132.00K | ▼ -1532.6% |
| 2017 | -0.62x | CA$-537.68K | CA$869.19K | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2016 | -0.61x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$2.08 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2015 | -0.31x | CA$-433.34K | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +47.6% |
| 2014 | -0.59x | CA$-614.45K | CA$1.05 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2013 | -0.97x | CA$-921.19K | CA$949.86K | ▼ -1147.7% |
| 2012 | -0.08x | CA$-96.04K | CA$1.24 Million | ▲ +92.9% |
| 2011 | -1.10x | CA$-564.70K | CA$514.71K | ▲ +74.2% |
| 2010 | -4.26x | CA$-865.76K | CA$203.31K | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2009 | -2.75x | CA$-889.16K | CA$323.26K | ▼ -168.1% |
| 2008 | -1.03x | CA$-922.61K | CA$899.22K | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2007 | -1.92x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$574.30K | ▼ -485.0% |
| 2006 | -0.33x | CA$-211.79K | CA$643.90K | ▼ -276.4% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | CA$-50.84K | CA$581.73K | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | CA$-150.11K | CA$716.03K | ▼ -604591.1% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | CA$-34.00 | CA$980.68K | ▲ +92.9% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | CA$-375.00 | CA$770.95K | ▼ -221.8% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | CA$281.00 | CA$703.62K | ▲ +100.2% |
| 2000 | -0.19x | CA$-105.17K | CA$550.87K | ▲ +57.0% |
| 1999 | -0.44x | CA$-114.44K | CA$257.88K | ▲ +44.2% |
| 1998 | -0.79x | CA$-114.00K | CA$143.45K | — |