Wallbridge Mining Company Limited (WM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Wallbridge Mining Company Limited (WM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$36.05 Million) in one year. See WM financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Wallbridge Mining Company Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Wallbridge Mining Company Limited across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see WM cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Wallbridge Mining Company Limited (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Wallbridge Mining Company Limited. Check cash flow quality index of Wallbridge Mining Company Limited to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.09x | CA$-3.35 Million | CA$35.97 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2024 | -0.14x | CA$-4.55 Million | CA$32.51 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2023 | -0.11x | CA$-3.77 Million | CA$35.19 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2022 | -0.14x | CA$-4.40 Million | CA$30.89 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | CA$-2.55 Million | CA$29.98 Million | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2020 | -0.47x | CA$-9.09 Million | CA$19.31 Million | ▼ -140.6% |
| 2019 | -0.20x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$12.41 Million | ▼ -177.0% |
| 2018 | -0.07x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$22.50 Million | ▲ +80.2% |
| 2017 | -0.36x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$3.92 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2016 | -0.70x | CA$-2.71 Million | CA$3.86 Million | ▼ -279.7% |
| 2015 | -0.18x | CA$-868.82K | CA$4.71 Million | ▼ -185.4% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | CA$3.47 Million | CA$16.04 Million | ▲ +177.0% |
| 2013 | -0.28x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$4.28 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-1.78 Million | CA$4.74 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2011 | -0.31x | CA$-1.95 Million | CA$6.36 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2010 | -0.33x | CA$-2.21 Million | CA$6.63 Million | ▼ -303.4% |
| 2009 | -0.08x | CA$-471.84K | CA$5.70 Million | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2008 | -0.68x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$2.20 Million | ▼ -172.9% |
| 2007 | -0.25x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$6.26 Million | ▲ +61.2% |
| 2006 | -0.64x | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$1.85 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2005 | -0.70x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▼ -114.9% |
| 2004 | -0.32x | CA$-1.54 Million | CA$4.75 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2003 | -0.48x | CA$-1.90 Million | CA$4.00 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | CA$-1.45 Million | CA$3.49 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2001 | -0.47x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$3.00 Million | ▼ -210.3% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | CA$-469.65K | CA$3.12 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 1999 | -1.53x | CA$-520.75K | CA$339.46K | ▲ +44.3% |
| 1998 | -2.76x | CA$-439.18K | CA$159.37K | ▼ -361.8% |
| 1997 | -0.60x | CA$-127.97K | CA$214.43K | — |