Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: 0.03x

Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd (5703) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$14.74 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$447.11 Million) in one year. Check 5703 cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$14.74 Million
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$447.11 Million
TWD

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd (2016–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd from 2016 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd across 10 annual periods. Check Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2016–2025)

Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2016 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Landis Taipei Hotel Co Ltd (5703) cash conversion ratio.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.18x NT$81.55 Million NT$465.55 Million ▲ +4.2%
2024 0.17x NT$78.17 Million NT$464.85 Million ▼ -11.5%
2023 0.19x NT$89.28 Million NT$469.99 Million ▲ +311.0%
2022 -0.09x NT$-45.52 Million NT$505.69 Million ▲ +2.6%
2021 -0.09x NT$-49.87 Million NT$539.77 Million ▲ +18.4%
2020 -0.11x NT$-81.84 Million NT$723.13 Million ▼ -100.0%
2019 7940.71x NT$166.75 Million NT$21.00K ▲ +21009802.6%
2018 0.04x NT$23.77 Million NT$628.89 Million ▼ -44.0%
2017 0.07x NT$36.01 Million NT$533.98 Million ▼ -36.3%
2016 0.11x NT$53.69 Million NT$507.38 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.