LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.02x

LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd (6212) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$-127.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$7.36 Billion) in one year. Check 6212 cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$-127.72 Million
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$7.36 Billion
TWD

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd (2017–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd from 2017 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd across 8 annual periods. Check LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2017–2024)

LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2017 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LI Ming Development Construction Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 6212 cash flow conversion.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.05x NT$-425.09 Million NT$8.24 Billion ▼ -112.4%
2023 0.42x NT$4.00 Billion NT$9.60 Billion ▲ +434.5%
2022 -0.12x NT$-1.51 Billion NT$12.11 Billion ▲ +66.5%
2021 -0.37x NT$-3.85 Billion NT$10.36 Billion ▼ -236.9%
2020 -0.11x NT$-768.03 Million NT$6.96 Billion ▲ +81.3%
2019 -0.59x NT$-2.60 Billion NT$4.42 Billion ▼ -135.9%
2018 1.64x NT$1.25 Billion NT$763.40 Million ▲ +752.8%
2017 -0.25x NT$-522.50 Million NT$2.08 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.