Alphamin Res (AFM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of June 2025:
0.38x
Alphamin Res (AFM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.38x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$56.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$149.18 Million) in one year. Check AFM cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.38x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
CA$56.76 Million
CAD
Total Liabilities
CA$149.18 Million
CAD
Data as of
Jun 2025
Most recent filing
Alphamin Res Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alphamin Res across 25 annual periods. Also explore AFM total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alphamin Res (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alphamin Res. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AFM company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.98x | CA$184.46 Million | CA$187.71 Million | ▲ +6281.3% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | CA$2.33 Million | CA$151.25 Million | ▼ -99.0% |
| 2022 | 1.52x | CA$186.63 Million | CA$122.70 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2021 | 1.29x | CA$142.19 Million | CA$110.42 Million | ▲ +605.9% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | CA$18.21 Million | CA$99.79 Million | ▲ +577.7% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | CA$-5.50 Million | CA$143.99 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | CA$-5.19 Million | CA$100.34 Million | ▲ +88.4% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-9.74 Million | CA$21.79 Million | ▲ +91.3% |
| 2016 | -5.11x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2015 | -4.62x | CA$-6.90 Million | CA$1.49 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2014 | -7.64x | CA$-3.57 Million | CA$467.81K | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2013 | -5.78x | CA$-3.36 Million | CA$581.22K | ▼ -219.0% |
| 2012 | -1.81x | CA$-2.69 Million | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2011 | -1.49x | CA$-770.72K | CA$516.33K | ▼ -254.4% |
| 2010 | -0.42x | CA$-140.16K | CA$332.77K | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2009 | -0.71x | CA$-167.19K | CA$236.51K | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2008 | -1.31x | CA$-263.32K | CA$200.37K | ▲ +36.3% |
| 2007 | -2.06x | CA$-366.04K | CA$177.33K | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2006 | -2.43x | CA$-348.43K | CA$143.35K | ▼ -515.8% |
| 2005 | -0.39x | CA$-102.59K | CA$259.91K | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2004 | -0.83x | CA$-121.39K | CA$145.98K | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2003 | -1.03x | CA$-103.98K | CA$101.43K | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2002 | -7.64x | CA$-143.11K | CA$18.73K | ▼ -181.1% |
| 2001 | -2.72x | CA$-214.09K | CA$78.79K | ▼ -820.6% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | CA$69.43K | CA$184.10K | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.