Alphamin Res Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alphamin Res cash flow-to-debt ratio. Alphamin Res (AFM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.38x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$56.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$149.18 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Alphamin Res to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Alphamin Res (2000–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Alphamin Res from 2000 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Alphamin Res across 25 annual periods. Check AFM cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Alphamin Res Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2024)
Alphamin Res cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alphamin Res. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Alphamin Res.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.98x | CA$184.46 Million | CA$187.71 Million | ▲ +6281.3% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | CA$2.33 Million | CA$151.25 Million | ▼ -99.0% |
| 2022 | 1.52x | CA$186.63 Million | CA$122.70 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2021 | 1.29x | CA$142.19 Million | CA$110.42 Million | ▲ +605.9% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | CA$18.21 Million | CA$99.79 Million | ▲ +577.7% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | CA$-5.50 Million | CA$143.99 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | CA$-5.19 Million | CA$100.34 Million | ▲ +88.4% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-9.74 Million | CA$21.79 Million | ▲ +91.3% |
| 2016 | -5.11x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2015 | -4.62x | CA$-6.90 Million | CA$1.49 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2014 | -7.64x | CA$-3.57 Million | CA$467.81K | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2013 | -5.78x | CA$-3.36 Million | CA$581.22K | ▼ -219.0% |
| 2012 | -1.81x | CA$-2.69 Million | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2011 | -1.49x | CA$-770.72K | CA$516.33K | ▼ -254.4% |
| 2010 | -0.42x | CA$-140.16K | CA$332.77K | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2009 | -0.71x | CA$-167.19K | CA$236.51K | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2008 | -1.31x | CA$-263.32K | CA$200.37K | ▲ +36.3% |
| 2007 | -2.06x | CA$-366.04K | CA$177.33K | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2006 | -2.43x | CA$-348.43K | CA$143.35K | ▼ -515.8% |
| 2005 | -0.39x | CA$-102.59K | CA$259.91K | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2004 | -0.83x | CA$-121.39K | CA$145.98K | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2003 | -1.03x | CA$-103.98K | CA$101.43K | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2002 | -7.64x | CA$-143.11K | CA$18.73K | ▼ -181.1% |
| 2001 | -2.72x | CA$-214.09K | CA$78.79K | ▼ -820.6% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | CA$69.43K | CA$184.10K | — |