Alphamin Res (AFM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alphamin Res (AFM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.38x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$56.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$149.18 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Alphamin Res to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alphamin Res Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alphamin Res across 25 annual periods. Also explore AFM net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alphamin Res (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alphamin Res. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AFM stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.98x | CA$184.46 Million | CA$187.71 Million | ▲ +6281.3% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | CA$2.33 Million | CA$151.25 Million | ▼ -99.0% |
| 2022 | 1.52x | CA$186.63 Million | CA$122.70 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2021 | 1.29x | CA$142.19 Million | CA$110.42 Million | ▲ +605.9% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | CA$18.21 Million | CA$99.79 Million | ▲ +577.7% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | CA$-5.50 Million | CA$143.99 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | CA$-5.19 Million | CA$100.34 Million | ▲ +88.4% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-9.74 Million | CA$21.79 Million | ▲ +91.3% |
| 2016 | -5.11x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2015 | -4.62x | CA$-6.90 Million | CA$1.49 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2014 | -7.64x | CA$-3.57 Million | CA$467.81K | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2013 | -5.78x | CA$-3.36 Million | CA$581.22K | ▼ -219.0% |
| 2012 | -1.81x | CA$-2.69 Million | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2011 | -1.49x | CA$-770.72K | CA$516.33K | ▼ -254.4% |
| 2010 | -0.42x | CA$-140.16K | CA$332.77K | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2009 | -0.71x | CA$-167.19K | CA$236.51K | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2008 | -1.31x | CA$-263.32K | CA$200.37K | ▲ +36.3% |
| 2007 | -2.06x | CA$-366.04K | CA$177.33K | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2006 | -2.43x | CA$-348.43K | CA$143.35K | ▼ -515.8% |
| 2005 | -0.39x | CA$-102.59K | CA$259.91K | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2004 | -0.83x | CA$-121.39K | CA$145.98K | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2003 | -1.03x | CA$-103.98K | CA$101.43K | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2002 | -7.64x | CA$-143.11K | CA$18.73K | ▼ -181.1% |
| 2001 | -2.72x | CA$-214.09K | CA$78.79K | ▼ -820.6% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | CA$69.43K | CA$184.10K | — |