AIS Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AIS Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. AIS Resources Ltd (AIS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-242.85K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.23 Million) in one year. Check AIS operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of AIS Resources Ltd (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of AIS Resources Ltd from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for AIS Resources Ltd across 29 annual periods. Check how aggressively does AIS Resources Ltd reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
AIS Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
AIS Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AIS Resources Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of AIS Resources Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.05x | CA$-124.50K | CA$2.46 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | CA$-87.41K | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2022 | -0.31x | CA$-398.30K | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2021 | -0.75x | CA$-900.92K | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2020 | -0.69x | CA$-686.61K | CA$997.85K | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2019 | -0.88x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$1.52 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2018 | -1.02x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.12 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2017 | -4.43x | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$308.61K | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2016 | -3.21x | CA$-574.78K | CA$178.94K | ▼ -322.2% |
| 2015 | -0.76x | CA$-263.39K | CA$346.19K | ▲ +90.6% |
| 2014 | -8.09x | CA$-759.24K | CA$93.81K | ▼ -518.7% |
| 2013 | -1.31x | CA$-40.34K | CA$30.84K | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2012 | -2.26x | CA$-50.15K | CA$22.14K | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2011 | -2.05x | CA$-50.93K | CA$24.85K | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2010 | -3.29x | CA$-49.38K | CA$15.00K | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2009 | -2.39x | CA$-48.50K | CA$20.26K | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2008 | -1.94x | CA$-34.56K | CA$17.84K | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2007 | -2.30x | CA$-47.19K | CA$20.53K | ▼ -491.5% |
| 2006 | 0.59x | CA$43.53K | CA$74.15K | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2005 | 0.76x | CA$55.45K | CA$72.57K | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2004 | 0.94x | CA$76.12K | CA$81.35K | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2003 | 2.15x | CA$122.82K | CA$57.12K | ▲ +219.5% |
| 2002 | -1.80x | CA$-102.02K | CA$56.68K | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2001 | -2.63x | CA$-240.33K | CA$91.40K | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2000 | -1.84x | CA$-295.92K | CA$161.07K | ▲ +34.7% |
| 1999 | -2.81x | CA$-99.44K | CA$35.34K | ▼ -77.2% |
| 1998 | -1.59x | CA$-63.60K | CA$40.04K | ▼ -21.6% |
| 1997 | -1.31x | CA$-95.25K | CA$72.90K | ▼ -1155.0% |
| 1996 | -0.10x | CA$-21.55K | CA$206.96K | — |