Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-292.67K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$24.72 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Amex Exploration Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Amex Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Amex Exploration Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Amex Exploration Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Amex Exploration Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Amex Exploration Inc. Check cash flow quality index of Amex Exploration Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.06x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$24.81 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$19.29 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$22.19 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2021 | -0.73x | CA$-5.61 Million | CA$7.66 Million | ▼ -255.9% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | CA$-2.31 Million | CA$11.26 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2019 | -0.34x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$3.25 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2018 | -0.52x | CA$-405.12K | CA$785.16K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-414.99K | CA$919.80K | ▼ -323.1% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-58.84K | CA$551.74K | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2015 | -0.31x | CA$-199.51K | CA$648.02K | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2014 | -0.70x | CA$-460.91K | CA$655.31K | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2013 | -0.46x | CA$-378.53K | CA$829.11K | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2012 | -0.42x | CA$-432.67K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | CA$-276.23K | CA$604.84K | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2010 | -2.61x | CA$-804.69K | CA$307.91K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2009 | -5.02x | CA$-412.32K | CA$82.17K | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2008 | -6.75x | CA$-188.91K | CA$27.97K | ▼ -186.1% |
| 2007 | -2.36x | CA$-161.16K | CA$68.26K | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2006 | -1.35x | CA$-54.00K | CA$40.14K | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2005 | -0.66x | CA$-56.54K | CA$86.09K | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2004 | -2.28x | CA$-106.67K | CA$46.86K | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2003 | -6.78x | CA$-132.59K | CA$19.55K | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2002 | -10.50x | CA$-194.29K | CA$18.51K | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2001 | -8.35x | CA$-208.81K | CA$25.00K | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2000 | -14.42x | CA$-360.57K | CA$25.00K | ▼ -30.0% |
| 1999 | -11.10x | CA$-277.39K | CA$25.00K | ▲ +38.8% |
| 1998 | -18.12x | CA$-532.97K | CA$29.41K | ▼ -1347.2% |
| 1997 | -1.25x | CA$-401.99K | CA$320.98K | — |