Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-292.67K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$24.72 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Amex Exploration Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Amex Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Amex Exploration Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore Amex Exploration Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Amex Exploration Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Amex Exploration Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Amex Exploration Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.06x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$24.81 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$19.29 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$22.19 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2021 | -0.73x | CA$-5.61 Million | CA$7.66 Million | ▼ -255.9% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | CA$-2.31 Million | CA$11.26 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2019 | -0.34x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$3.25 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2018 | -0.52x | CA$-405.12K | CA$785.16K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-414.99K | CA$919.80K | ▼ -323.1% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-58.84K | CA$551.74K | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2015 | -0.31x | CA$-199.51K | CA$648.02K | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2014 | -0.70x | CA$-460.91K | CA$655.31K | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2013 | -0.46x | CA$-378.53K | CA$829.11K | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2012 | -0.42x | CA$-432.67K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | CA$-276.23K | CA$604.84K | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2010 | -2.61x | CA$-804.69K | CA$307.91K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2009 | -5.02x | CA$-412.32K | CA$82.17K | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2008 | -6.75x | CA$-188.91K | CA$27.97K | ▼ -186.1% |
| 2007 | -2.36x | CA$-161.16K | CA$68.26K | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2006 | -1.35x | CA$-54.00K | CA$40.14K | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2005 | -0.66x | CA$-56.54K | CA$86.09K | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2004 | -2.28x | CA$-106.67K | CA$46.86K | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2003 | -6.78x | CA$-132.59K | CA$19.55K | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2002 | -10.50x | CA$-194.29K | CA$18.51K | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2001 | -8.35x | CA$-208.81K | CA$25.00K | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2000 | -14.42x | CA$-360.57K | CA$25.00K | ▼ -30.0% |
| 1999 | -11.10x | CA$-277.39K | CA$25.00K | ▲ +38.8% |
| 1998 | -18.12x | CA$-532.97K | CA$29.41K | ▼ -1347.2% |
| 1997 | -1.25x | CA$-401.99K | CA$320.98K | — |