Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-292.67K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$24.72 Million) in one year. Check Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Amex Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Amex Exploration Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Amex Exploration Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Amex Exploration Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Amex Exploration Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.06x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$24.81 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$19.29 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$22.19 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2021 | -0.73x | CA$-5.61 Million | CA$7.66 Million | ▼ -255.9% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | CA$-2.31 Million | CA$11.26 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2019 | -0.34x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$3.25 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2018 | -0.52x | CA$-405.12K | CA$785.16K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-414.99K | CA$919.80K | ▼ -323.1% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-58.84K | CA$551.74K | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2015 | -0.31x | CA$-199.51K | CA$648.02K | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2014 | -0.70x | CA$-460.91K | CA$655.31K | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2013 | -0.46x | CA$-378.53K | CA$829.11K | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2012 | -0.42x | CA$-432.67K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | CA$-276.23K | CA$604.84K | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2010 | -2.61x | CA$-804.69K | CA$307.91K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2009 | -5.02x | CA$-412.32K | CA$82.17K | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2008 | -6.75x | CA$-188.91K | CA$27.97K | ▼ -186.1% |
| 2007 | -2.36x | CA$-161.16K | CA$68.26K | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2006 | -1.35x | CA$-54.00K | CA$40.14K | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2005 | -0.66x | CA$-56.54K | CA$86.09K | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2004 | -2.28x | CA$-106.67K | CA$46.86K | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2003 | -6.78x | CA$-132.59K | CA$19.55K | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2002 | -10.50x | CA$-194.29K | CA$18.51K | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2001 | -8.35x | CA$-208.81K | CA$25.00K | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2000 | -14.42x | CA$-360.57K | CA$25.00K | ▼ -30.0% |
| 1999 | -11.10x | CA$-277.39K | CA$25.00K | ▲ +38.8% |
| 1998 | -18.12x | CA$-532.97K | CA$29.41K | ▼ -1347.2% |
| 1997 | -1.25x | CA$-401.99K | CA$320.98K | — |