Amex Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Amex Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-292.67K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$24.72 Million) in one year. Check Amex Exploration Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Amex Exploration Inc (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Amex Exploration Inc from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Amex Exploration Inc across 28 annual periods. Check Amex Exploration Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Amex Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Amex Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Amex Exploration Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Amex Exploration Inc (AMX) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.06x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$24.81 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$19.29 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$22.19 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2021 | -0.73x | CA$-5.61 Million | CA$7.66 Million | ▼ -255.9% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | CA$-2.31 Million | CA$11.26 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2019 | -0.34x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$3.25 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2018 | -0.52x | CA$-405.12K | CA$785.16K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | CA$-414.99K | CA$919.80K | ▼ -323.1% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-58.84K | CA$551.74K | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2015 | -0.31x | CA$-199.51K | CA$648.02K | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2014 | -0.70x | CA$-460.91K | CA$655.31K | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2013 | -0.46x | CA$-378.53K | CA$829.11K | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2012 | -0.42x | CA$-432.67K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | CA$-276.23K | CA$604.84K | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2010 | -2.61x | CA$-804.69K | CA$307.91K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2009 | -5.02x | CA$-412.32K | CA$82.17K | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2008 | -6.75x | CA$-188.91K | CA$27.97K | ▼ -186.1% |
| 2007 | -2.36x | CA$-161.16K | CA$68.26K | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2006 | -1.35x | CA$-54.00K | CA$40.14K | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2005 | -0.66x | CA$-56.54K | CA$86.09K | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2004 | -2.28x | CA$-106.67K | CA$46.86K | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2003 | -6.78x | CA$-132.59K | CA$19.55K | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2002 | -10.50x | CA$-194.29K | CA$18.51K | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2001 | -8.35x | CA$-208.81K | CA$25.00K | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2000 | -14.42x | CA$-360.57K | CA$25.00K | ▼ -30.0% |
| 1999 | -11.10x | CA$-277.39K | CA$25.00K | ▲ +38.8% |
| 1998 | -18.12x | CA$-532.97K | CA$29.41K | ▼ -1347.2% |
| 1997 | -1.25x | CA$-401.99K | CA$320.98K | — |