Arch Biopartners Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Arch Biopartners Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Arch Biopartners Inc (ARCH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of March 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-465.38K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$8.22 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Arch Biopartners Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Arch Biopartners Inc (1997–2023)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Arch Biopartners Inc from 1997 to 2023. Historical debt coverage capacity for Arch Biopartners Inc across 27 annual periods. Check ARCH total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Arch Biopartners Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2023)
Arch Biopartners Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2023. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Arch Biopartners Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ARCH cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -0.04x | CA$-234.07K | CA$6.68 Million | ▲ +83.5% |
| 2022 | -0.21x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$5.09 Million | ▲ +53.4% |
| 2021 | -0.46x | CA$-2.98 Million | CA$6.55 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2020 | -0.41x | CA$-1.90 Million | CA$4.61 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2019 | -0.52x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$3.47 Million | ▲ +72.1% |
| 2018 | -1.86x | CA$-3.20 Million | CA$1.72 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2017 | -1.20x | CA$-760.17K | CA$631.35K | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2016 | -1.51x | CA$-730.53K | CA$483.94K | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2015 | -0.93x | CA$-474.82K | CA$508.02K | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2014 | -0.97x | CA$-398.51K | CA$412.38K | ▼ -153.6% |
| 2013 | -0.38x | CA$-176.15K | CA$462.19K | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2012 | -0.65x | CA$-293.82K | CA$449.23K | ▲ +13.6% |
| 2011 | -0.76x | CA$-300.68K | CA$397.02K | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2010 | -0.56x | CA$-205.71K | CA$370.41K | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2009 | -1.15x | CA$-400.53K | CA$347.56K | ▼ -1080.3% |
| 2008 | -0.10x | CA$-251.16K | CA$2.57 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2007 | -0.08x | CA$-151.81K | CA$1.97 Million | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | CA$119.92K | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +132.6% |
| 2005 | -0.23x | CA$-470.38K | CA$2.04 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2004 | -0.48x | CA$-961.78K | CA$2.02 Million | ▼ -166.0% |
| 2003 | -0.18x | CA$-280.87K | CA$1.57 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2002 | -8.87x | CA$-373.42K | CA$42.08K | ▼ -711.5% |
| 2001 | -1.09x | CA$-251.46K | CA$229.99K | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2000 | -2.51x | CA$-803.47K | CA$320.21K | ▲ +38.3% |
| 1999 | -4.06x | CA$-834.06K | CA$205.23K | ▼ -155.1% |
| 1998 | -1.59x | CA$-503.20K | CA$315.90K | ▲ +39.3% |
| 1997 | -2.62x | CA$-997.15K | CA$380.18K | — |