Azimut Exploration Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Azimut Exploration Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Azimut Exploration Inc. (AZM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.38x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.74 Million) in one year. Check Azimut Exploration Inc. (AZM) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Azimut Exploration Inc. (2002–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Azimut Exploration Inc. from 2002 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Azimut Exploration Inc. across 24 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Azimut Exploration Inc. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Azimut Exploration Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Azimut Exploration Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Azimut Exploration Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Azimut Exploration Inc. cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | CA$2.05 Million | CA$9.38 Million | ▲ +239.5% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | CA$508.74K | CA$7.90 Million | ▲ +127.5% |
| 2023 | -0.23x | CA$-735.88K | CA$3.14 Million | ▼ -193.4% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | CA$1.77 Million | CA$7.03 Million | ▲ +323.3% |
| 2021 | -0.11x | CA$-846.53K | CA$7.53 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2020 | -0.22x | CA$-837.72K | CA$3.78 Million | ▼ -570.3% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$153.19K | CA$3.25 Million | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | CA$-340.97K | CA$2.11 Million | ▼ -143.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-201.32K | CA$3.04 Million | ▲ +81.4% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | CA$-441.54K | CA$1.24 Million | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2015 | -1.45x | CA$-505.83K | CA$348.60K | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2014 | -0.91x | CA$-421.70K | CA$463.06K | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2013 | -0.52x | CA$-291.41K | CA$565.38K | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2012 | -1.25x | CA$-997.65K | CA$799.09K | ▼ -537.6% |
| 2011 | -0.20x | CA$-413.17K | CA$2.11 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2010 | -0.22x | CA$-682.34K | CA$3.05 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2009 | -0.83x | CA$-1.57 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▼ -7616.0% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | CA$-30.10K | CA$2.81 Million | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2007 | -1.12x | CA$-618.13K | CA$552.92K | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2006 | -1.01x | CA$-415.64K | CA$411.23K | ▲ +82.7% |
| 2005 | -5.84x | CA$-484.08K | CA$82.92K | ▼ -347.6% |
| 2004 | -1.30x | CA$-177.67K | CA$136.21K | ▼ -364.7% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | CA$-106.97K | CA$381.08K | ▼ -1431.8% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | CA$-6.79K | CA$370.60K | — |