Azimut Exploration Inc. (AZM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Azimut Exploration Inc. (AZM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.38x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.74 Million) in one year. See Azimut Exploration Inc. free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Azimut Exploration Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Azimut Exploration Inc. across 24 annual periods. Also explore Azimut Exploration Inc. equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Azimut Exploration Inc. (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Azimut Exploration Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Azimut Exploration Inc. (AZM) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | CA$2.05 Million | CA$9.38 Million | ▲ +239.5% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | CA$508.74K | CA$7.90 Million | ▲ +127.5% |
| 2023 | -0.23x | CA$-735.88K | CA$3.14 Million | ▼ -193.4% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | CA$1.77 Million | CA$7.03 Million | ▲ +323.3% |
| 2021 | -0.11x | CA$-846.53K | CA$7.53 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2020 | -0.22x | CA$-837.72K | CA$3.78 Million | ▼ -570.3% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$153.19K | CA$3.25 Million | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | CA$-340.97K | CA$2.11 Million | ▼ -143.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-201.32K | CA$3.04 Million | ▲ +81.4% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | CA$-441.54K | CA$1.24 Million | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2015 | -1.45x | CA$-505.83K | CA$348.60K | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2014 | -0.91x | CA$-421.70K | CA$463.06K | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2013 | -0.52x | CA$-291.41K | CA$565.38K | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2012 | -1.25x | CA$-997.65K | CA$799.09K | ▼ -537.6% |
| 2011 | -0.20x | CA$-413.17K | CA$2.11 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2010 | -0.22x | CA$-682.34K | CA$3.05 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2009 | -0.83x | CA$-1.57 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▼ -7616.0% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | CA$-30.10K | CA$2.81 Million | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2007 | -1.12x | CA$-618.13K | CA$552.92K | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2006 | -1.01x | CA$-415.64K | CA$411.23K | ▲ +82.7% |
| 2005 | -5.84x | CA$-484.08K | CA$82.92K | ▼ -347.6% |
| 2004 | -1.30x | CA$-177.67K | CA$136.21K | ▼ -364.7% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | CA$-106.97K | CA$381.08K | ▼ -1431.8% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | CA$-6.79K | CA$370.60K | — |