Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (BKM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (BKM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-30.19K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.22 Million) in one year. Check Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. across 26 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (2001–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pacific Booker Minerals Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BKM company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.11x | CA$129.76K | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +650.7% |
| 2025 | 0.01x | CA$11.78K | CA$833.79K | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2024 | -0.46x | CA$-169.33K | CA$364.94K | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2023 | -7.38x | CA$-446.55K | CA$60.52K | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2022 | -7.16x | CA$-335.36K | CA$46.82K | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2021 | -12.29x | CA$-406.62K | CA$33.08K | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2020 | -14.07x | CA$-501.28K | CA$35.64K | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2019 | -9.36x | CA$-195.26K | CA$20.85K | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2018 | -16.67x | CA$-379.02K | CA$22.74K | ▼ -146.0% |
| 2017 | -6.78x | CA$-338.89K | CA$50.01K | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2016 | -10.94x | CA$-505.14K | CA$46.17K | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2015 | -10.83x | CA$-582.85K | CA$53.80K | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2014 | -16.56x | CA$-880.16K | CA$53.15K | ▼ -224.4% |
| 2013 | 13.31x | CA$949.82K | CA$71.34K | ▲ +489.0% |
| 2012 | -3.42x | CA$-870.45K | CA$254.31K | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2011 | -2.52x | CA$-965.13K | CA$382.78K | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2010 | -1.55x | CA$-975.76K | CA$629.04K | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2009 | -0.59x | CA$-614.66K | CA$1.04 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2008 | -1.41x | CA$-872.14K | CA$617.63K | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2007 | -2.06x | CA$-992.63K | CA$482.87K | ▼ -567.7% |
| 2006 | -0.31x | CA$-622.22K | CA$2.02 Million | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2005 | -0.18x | CA$-498.31K | CA$2.74 Million | ▼ -308.3% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | CA$40.16K | CA$459.78K | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2003 | -2.49x | CA$-852.60K | CA$341.93K | ▼ -766.2% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | CA$242.55K | CA$648.03K | ▲ +120.0% |
| 2001 | -1.87x | CA$-469.86K | CA$251.50K | — |