Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (BKM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (BKM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-30.19K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.22 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BKM cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (2001–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pacific Booker Minerals Inc.. Check Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.11x | CA$129.76K | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +650.7% |
| 2025 | 0.01x | CA$11.78K | CA$833.79K | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2024 | -0.46x | CA$-169.33K | CA$364.94K | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2023 | -7.38x | CA$-446.55K | CA$60.52K | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2022 | -7.16x | CA$-335.36K | CA$46.82K | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2021 | -12.29x | CA$-406.62K | CA$33.08K | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2020 | -14.07x | CA$-501.28K | CA$35.64K | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2019 | -9.36x | CA$-195.26K | CA$20.85K | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2018 | -16.67x | CA$-379.02K | CA$22.74K | ▼ -146.0% |
| 2017 | -6.78x | CA$-338.89K | CA$50.01K | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2016 | -10.94x | CA$-505.14K | CA$46.17K | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2015 | -10.83x | CA$-582.85K | CA$53.80K | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2014 | -16.56x | CA$-880.16K | CA$53.15K | ▼ -224.4% |
| 2013 | 13.31x | CA$949.82K | CA$71.34K | ▲ +489.0% |
| 2012 | -3.42x | CA$-870.45K | CA$254.31K | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2011 | -2.52x | CA$-965.13K | CA$382.78K | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2010 | -1.55x | CA$-975.76K | CA$629.04K | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2009 | -0.59x | CA$-614.66K | CA$1.04 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2008 | -1.41x | CA$-872.14K | CA$617.63K | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2007 | -2.06x | CA$-992.63K | CA$482.87K | ▼ -567.7% |
| 2006 | -0.31x | CA$-622.22K | CA$2.02 Million | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2005 | -0.18x | CA$-498.31K | CA$2.74 Million | ▼ -308.3% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | CA$40.16K | CA$459.78K | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2003 | -2.49x | CA$-852.60K | CA$341.93K | ▼ -766.2% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | CA$242.55K | CA$648.03K | ▲ +120.0% |
| 2001 | -1.87x | CA$-469.86K | CA$251.50K | — |