Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (BKM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-30.19K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.22 Million) in one year. Check BKM cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (2001–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. from 2001 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. across 26 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2026)
Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pacific Booker Minerals Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.11x | CA$129.76K | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +650.7% |
| 2025 | 0.01x | CA$11.78K | CA$833.79K | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2024 | -0.46x | CA$-169.33K | CA$364.94K | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2023 | -7.38x | CA$-446.55K | CA$60.52K | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2022 | -7.16x | CA$-335.36K | CA$46.82K | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2021 | -12.29x | CA$-406.62K | CA$33.08K | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2020 | -14.07x | CA$-501.28K | CA$35.64K | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2019 | -9.36x | CA$-195.26K | CA$20.85K | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2018 | -16.67x | CA$-379.02K | CA$22.74K | ▼ -146.0% |
| 2017 | -6.78x | CA$-338.89K | CA$50.01K | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2016 | -10.94x | CA$-505.14K | CA$46.17K | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2015 | -10.83x | CA$-582.85K | CA$53.80K | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2014 | -16.56x | CA$-880.16K | CA$53.15K | ▼ -224.4% |
| 2013 | 13.31x | CA$949.82K | CA$71.34K | ▲ +489.0% |
| 2012 | -3.42x | CA$-870.45K | CA$254.31K | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2011 | -2.52x | CA$-965.13K | CA$382.78K | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2010 | -1.55x | CA$-975.76K | CA$629.04K | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2009 | -0.59x | CA$-614.66K | CA$1.04 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2008 | -1.41x | CA$-872.14K | CA$617.63K | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2007 | -2.06x | CA$-992.63K | CA$482.87K | ▼ -567.7% |
| 2006 | -0.31x | CA$-622.22K | CA$2.02 Million | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2005 | -0.18x | CA$-498.31K | CA$2.74 Million | ▼ -308.3% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | CA$40.16K | CA$459.78K | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2003 | -2.49x | CA$-852.60K | CA$341.93K | ▼ -766.2% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | CA$242.55K | CA$648.03K | ▲ +120.0% |
| 2001 | -1.87x | CA$-469.86K | CA$251.50K | — |