Barksdale Resources Corp (BRO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Barksdale Resources Corp (BRO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-410.52K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.21 Million) in one year. See BRO FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Barksdale Resources Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Barksdale Resources Corp across 26 annual periods. Also explore BRO shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Barksdale Resources Corp (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Barksdale Resources Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BRO market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.61x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$1.94 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2024 | -0.44x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$3.11 Million | ▲ +54.5% |
| 2023 | -0.96x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.79 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2022 | -0.62x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$2.41 Million | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2021 | -2.79x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$538.08K | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2020 | -3.49x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$343.32K | ▲ +23.0% |
| 2019 | -4.53x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$270.05K | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2018 | -5.56x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$198.88K | ▼ -120.3% |
| 2017 | -2.53x | CA$-224.92K | CA$89.05K | ▼ -2083.7% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-51.41K | CA$444.44K | ▼ -628.2% |
| 2015 | -0.02x | CA$-5.79K | CA$364.67K | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2014 | -0.14x | CA$-49.49K | CA$342.98K | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2013 | -0.45x | CA$-193.99K | CA$428.12K | ▼ -1633.2% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | CA$64.85K | CA$2.19 Million | ▲ +117.8% |
| 2011 | -0.17x | CA$-280.77K | CA$1.69 Million | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2010 | -1.37x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2009 | -0.77x | CA$-569.15K | CA$740.73K | ▲ +70.3% |
| 2008 | -2.59x | CA$-539.92K | CA$208.83K | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2007 | -3.81x | CA$-991.67K | CA$260.49K | ▼ -224.5% |
| 2006 | -1.17x | CA$-431.24K | CA$367.53K | ▲ +61.2% |
| 2005 | -3.02x | CA$-476.63K | CA$157.66K | ▼ -1439.5% |
| 2004 | -0.20x | CA$-182.95K | CA$931.66K | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2003 | -0.80x | CA$-178.28K | CA$223.52K | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2002 | -1.36x | CA$-148.69K | CA$109.52K | ▼ -203.5% |
| 2001 | -0.45x | CA$-84.92K | CA$189.81K | ▼ -778.0% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | CA$-25.53K | CA$501.08K | — |