Barksdale Resources Corp (BRO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Barksdale Resources Corp (BRO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-410.52K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.21 Million) in one year. See BRO financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Barksdale Resources Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Barksdale Resources Corp across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Barksdale Resources Corp generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Barksdale Resources Corp (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Barksdale Resources Corp. Check Barksdale Resources Corp earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.61x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$1.94 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2024 | -0.44x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$3.11 Million | ▲ +54.5% |
| 2023 | -0.96x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.79 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2022 | -0.62x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$2.41 Million | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2021 | -2.79x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$538.08K | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2020 | -3.49x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$343.32K | ▲ +23.0% |
| 2019 | -4.53x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$270.05K | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2018 | -5.56x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$198.88K | ▼ -120.3% |
| 2017 | -2.53x | CA$-224.92K | CA$89.05K | ▼ -2083.7% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-51.41K | CA$444.44K | ▼ -628.2% |
| 2015 | -0.02x | CA$-5.79K | CA$364.67K | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2014 | -0.14x | CA$-49.49K | CA$342.98K | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2013 | -0.45x | CA$-193.99K | CA$428.12K | ▼ -1633.2% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | CA$64.85K | CA$2.19 Million | ▲ +117.8% |
| 2011 | -0.17x | CA$-280.77K | CA$1.69 Million | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2010 | -1.37x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2009 | -0.77x | CA$-569.15K | CA$740.73K | ▲ +70.3% |
| 2008 | -2.59x | CA$-539.92K | CA$208.83K | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2007 | -3.81x | CA$-991.67K | CA$260.49K | ▼ -224.5% |
| 2006 | -1.17x | CA$-431.24K | CA$367.53K | ▲ +61.2% |
| 2005 | -3.02x | CA$-476.63K | CA$157.66K | ▼ -1439.5% |
| 2004 | -0.20x | CA$-182.95K | CA$931.66K | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2003 | -0.80x | CA$-178.28K | CA$223.52K | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2002 | -1.36x | CA$-148.69K | CA$109.52K | ▼ -203.5% |
| 2001 | -0.45x | CA$-84.92K | CA$189.81K | ▼ -778.0% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | CA$-25.53K | CA$501.08K | — |