Canada Carbon Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canada Carbon Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Canada Carbon Inc. (CCB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.02K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.58 Million) in one year. Check CCB cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Canada Carbon Inc. (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Canada Carbon Inc. from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Canada Carbon Inc. across 28 annual periods. Check CCB cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Canada Carbon Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Canada Carbon Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canada Carbon Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Canada Carbon Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.87x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$1.62 Million | ▼ -166.3% |
| 2023 | -0.33x | CA$-538.72K | CA$1.65 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2022 | -0.64x | CA$-833.66K | CA$1.30 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 2021 | -0.31x | CA$-267.01K | CA$851.48K | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2020 | -1.40x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$773.18K | ▼ -236.3% |
| 2019 | -0.42x | CA$-506.05K | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2018 | -0.64x | CA$-602.21K | CA$935.79K | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2017 | -0.96x | CA$-524.17K | CA$545.62K | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2016 | -1.25x | CA$-515.66K | CA$412.55K | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2015 | -3.36x | CA$-747.32K | CA$222.54K | ▼ -93.2% |
| 2014 | -1.74x | CA$-682.18K | CA$392.46K | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2013 | -2.83x | CA$-651.05K | CA$229.71K | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2012 | -11.49x | CA$-880.11K | CA$76.63K | ▼ -519.7% |
| 2011 | -1.85x | CA$-722.23K | CA$389.70K | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2010 | -3.55x | CA$-583.71K | CA$164.41K | ▼ -136.0% |
| 2009 | -1.50x | CA$-333.87K | CA$221.89K | ▼ -55.1% |
| 2008 | -0.97x | CA$-503.60K | CA$518.95K | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2007 | -1.28x | CA$-662.95K | CA$518.63K | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2006 | -2.11x | CA$-958.30K | CA$453.21K | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2005 | -2.14x | CA$-959.60K | CA$449.35K | ▲ +57.2% |
| 2004 | -4.99x | CA$-419.19K | CA$83.98K | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2003 | -3.32x | CA$-257.43K | CA$77.58K | ▼ -466.8% |
| 2002 | -0.59x | CA$-40.18K | CA$68.62K | ▲ +90.0% |
| 2001 | -5.83x | CA$-39.13K | CA$6.71K | ▼ -835.4% |
| 2000 | 0.79x | CA$205.75K | CA$259.45K | ▲ +301.9% |
| 1999 | -0.39x | CA$-352.39K | CA$897.20K | ▼ -1.0% |
| 1998 | -0.39x | CA$-220.29K | CA$566.57K | ▲ +83.0% |
| 1997 | -2.29x | CA$-181.43K | CA$79.10K | — |