Canterra Minerals Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canterra Minerals Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Canterra Minerals Corporation (CTM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.57 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.41 Million) in one year. Check CTM cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Canterra Minerals Corporation (1999–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Canterra Minerals Corporation from 1999 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Canterra Minerals Corporation across 26 annual periods. Check Canterra Minerals Corporation (CTM) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Canterra Minerals Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Canterra Minerals Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canterra Minerals Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Canterra Minerals Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -2.70x | CA$-2.73 Million | CA$1.01 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2023 | -5.08x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$279.04K | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2022 | -2.65x | CA$-2.38 Million | CA$897.09K | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2021 | -10.66x | CA$-4.09 Million | CA$383.64K | ▼ -33695.9% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | CA$-10.42K | CA$330.48K | ▲ +83.8% |
| 2019 | -0.19x | CA$-64.59K | CA$332.28K | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2018 | -0.42x | CA$-73.84K | CA$174.50K | ▼ -486.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-45.25K | CA$627.35K | ▲ +93.4% |
| 2016 | -1.09x | CA$-438.14K | CA$401.74K | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2015 | -3.35x | CA$-837.49K | CA$250.21K | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2014 | -6.97x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$203.99K | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2013 | -20.74x | CA$-765.11K | CA$36.88K | ▼ -134.4% |
| 2012 | -8.85x | CA$-656.99K | CA$74.25K | ▼ -197.3% |
| 2011 | -2.98x | CA$-516.93K | CA$173.65K | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2010 | -12.11x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$95.73K | ▼ -798.3% |
| 2009 | -1.35x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$1.03 Million | ▼ -526.0% |
| 2008 | -0.22x | CA$-732.59K | CA$3.40 Million | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2007 | -0.58x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$2.77 Million | ▼ -98.1% |
| 2006 | -0.29x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$4.82 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2005 | -0.33x | CA$-2.22 Million | CA$6.69 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2004 | -0.51x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$3.60 Million | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2003 | -0.86x | CA$-2.16 Million | CA$2.51 Million | ▼ -541.0% |
| 2002 | -0.13x | CA$-455.07K | CA$3.38 Million | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2001 | -0.74x | CA$-1.67 Million | CA$2.26 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2000 | -0.84x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -385.7% |
| 1999 | 0.29x | CA$153.83K | CA$524.33K | — |