CanAlaska Uranium Ltd (CVV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd (CVV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.41x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.91 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.08 Million) in one year. See CVV FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CanAlaska Uranium Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd across 25 annual periods. Also explore CVV net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CanAlaska Uranium Ltd (CVV) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -4.97x | CA$-13.56 Million | CA$2.73 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2024 | -6.18x | CA$-11.48 Million | CA$1.86 Million | ▼ -63.8% |
| 2023 | -3.77x | CA$-12.48 Million | CA$3.31 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2022 | -2.79x | CA$-5.89 Million | CA$2.11 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2021 | -6.80x | CA$-2.19 Million | CA$322.00K | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2020 | -26.75x | CA$-4.12 Million | CA$154.00K | ▼ -147.5% |
| 2019 | -10.81x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$157.00K | ▼ -142.2% |
| 2018 | -4.46x | CA$-937.00K | CA$210.00K | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2017 | -7.85x | CA$-1.54 Million | CA$196.00K | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2016 | -5.77x | CA$-900.00K | CA$156.00K | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2015 | -9.11x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$137.00K | ▼ -464.9% |
| 2014 | -1.61x | CA$-616.00K | CA$382.00K | ▲ +90.2% |
| 2013 | -16.39x | CA$-3.20 Million | CA$195.00K | ▼ -349.8% |
| 2012 | -3.64x | CA$-6.53 Million | CA$1.79 Million | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2011 | -3.02x | CA$-7.42 Million | CA$2.46 Million | ▼ -941.7% |
| 2010 | -0.29x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$5.03 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2009 | -0.42x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$3.85 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2008 | -0.49x | CA$-1.98 Million | CA$4.06 Million | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2007 | -1.43x | CA$-3.25 Million | CA$2.28 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2006 | -6.48x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$278.28K | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2005 | -12.65x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$97.30K | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2004 | -7.75x | CA$-521.29K | CA$67.30K | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2003 | -6.56x | CA$-406.84K | CA$62.06K | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2002 | -6.17x | CA$-466.78K | CA$75.63K | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2001 | -4.67x | CA$-495.27K | CA$105.99K | — |