Decibel Cannabis Company Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Decibel Cannabis Company Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Decibel Cannabis Company Inc (DB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$82.85 Million) in one year. Check DB cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Decibel Cannabis Company Inc (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Decibel Cannabis Company Inc from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Decibel Cannabis Company Inc across 27 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Decibel Cannabis Company Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Decibel Cannabis Company Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Decibel Cannabis Company Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Decibel Cannabis Company Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Decibel Cannabis Company Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | CA$3.98 Million | CA$87.14 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | CA$6.58 Million | CA$96.79 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | CA$8.26 Million | CA$93.67 Million | ▲ +138.7% |
| 2021 | -0.23x | CA$-17.15 Million | CA$75.19 Million | ▼ -197.5% |
| 2020 | -0.08x | CA$-4.24 Million | CA$55.30 Million | ▼ -158.2% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | CA$-1.44 Million | CA$48.66 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | CA$-3.59 Million | CA$14.31 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2017 | -0.20x | CA$-15.20K | CA$77.67K | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2016 | -0.22x | CA$-12.82K | CA$57.52K | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2015 | -2.77x | CA$-83.91K | CA$30.32K | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2014 | -4.99x | CA$-133.49K | CA$26.73K | ▼ -723.7% |
| 2013 | -0.61x | CA$-82.33K | CA$135.79K | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2012 | -0.50x | CA$-39.92K | CA$80.53K | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2011 | -2.11x | CA$-102.18K | CA$48.41K | ▼ -240.6% |
| 2010 | -0.62x | CA$-96.86K | CA$156.29K | ▼ -111.3% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | CA$-309.07K | CA$1.05 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2008 | -0.24x | CA$-406.81K | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2007 | -0.14x | CA$-260.45K | CA$1.86 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2006 | -0.19x | CA$-288.41K | CA$1.55 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2005 | -0.10x | CA$-169.74K | CA$1.62 Million | ▼ -117.5% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | CA$-8.32K | CA$172.44K | ▲ +99.7% |
| 2003 | -14.21x | CA$-87.82K | CA$6.18K | ▼ -144.8% |
| 2002 | -5.81x | CA$-60.35K | CA$10.39K | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2001 | -7.66x | CA$-44.02K | CA$5.75K | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2000 | -9.12x | CA$-51.48K | CA$5.64K | ▼ -2367.9% |
| 1999 | -0.37x | CA$-72.08K | CA$195.05K | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1998 | -14.02x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$105.89K | — |