Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. (EPL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. (EPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.89x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.48 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.66 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. (EPL) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eagle Plains Resources Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. (EPL) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.66x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$1.66 Million | ▼ -122.3% |
| 2024 | -0.30x | CA$-310.64K | CA$1.04 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2023 | -0.75x | CA$-687.48K | CA$912.97K | ▼ -266.1% |
| 2022 | 0.45x | CA$782.69K | CA$1.73 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2021 | 0.81x | CA$730.78K | CA$897.96K | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2020 | 0.56x | CA$404.12K | CA$723.60K | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | CA$127.14K | CA$428.50K | ▲ +106.1% |
| 2018 | -4.87x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$218.94K | ▼ -742.9% |
| 2017 | -0.58x | CA$-257.35K | CA$445.12K | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2016 | -3.17x | CA$-586.83K | CA$185.10K | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2015 | -3.16x | CA$-574.37K | CA$181.79K | ▼ -828.3% |
| 2014 | -0.34x | CA$-79.83K | CA$234.55K | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2013 | -0.98x | CA$-494.50K | CA$504.92K | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2012 | -0.62x | CA$-253.30K | CA$409.74K | ▼ -245.5% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | CA$1.13 Million | CA$2.65 Million | ▲ +282.3% |
| 2010 | -0.23x | CA$-224.54K | CA$963.24K | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2009 | -8.55x | CA$-2.93 Million | CA$343.15K | ▼ -4861.0% |
| 2008 | -0.17x | CA$-156.56K | CA$908.42K | ▼ -1430.8% |
| 2007 | -0.01x | CA$-23.75K | CA$2.11 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2006 | -0.45x | CA$-934.34K | CA$2.08 Million | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2005 | -1.31x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -805.5% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | CA$-270.37K | CA$1.87 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2003 | -0.36x | CA$-343.50K | CA$954.28K | ▼ -155.2% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | CA$-135.95K | CA$964.07K | ▲ +96.3% |
| 2001 | -3.86x | CA$-151.09K | CA$39.14K | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2000 | -11.40x | CA$-117.54K | CA$10.31K | ▼ -371.1% |
| 1999 | -2.42x | CA$-302.70K | CA$125.07K | ▼ -286.7% |
| 1998 | -0.63x | CA$-31.34K | CA$50.08K | ▼ -114.2% |
| 1997 | 4.40x | CA$29.86K | CA$6.79K | — |