Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. (EPL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. (EPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.89x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.48 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.66 Million) in one year. Explore EPL long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. (EPL) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eagle Plains Resources Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EPL market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.66x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$1.66 Million | ▼ -122.3% |
| 2024 | -0.30x | CA$-310.64K | CA$1.04 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2023 | -0.75x | CA$-687.48K | CA$912.97K | ▼ -266.1% |
| 2022 | 0.45x | CA$782.69K | CA$1.73 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2021 | 0.81x | CA$730.78K | CA$897.96K | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2020 | 0.56x | CA$404.12K | CA$723.60K | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | CA$127.14K | CA$428.50K | ▲ +106.1% |
| 2018 | -4.87x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$218.94K | ▼ -742.9% |
| 2017 | -0.58x | CA$-257.35K | CA$445.12K | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2016 | -3.17x | CA$-586.83K | CA$185.10K | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2015 | -3.16x | CA$-574.37K | CA$181.79K | ▼ -828.3% |
| 2014 | -0.34x | CA$-79.83K | CA$234.55K | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2013 | -0.98x | CA$-494.50K | CA$504.92K | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2012 | -0.62x | CA$-253.30K | CA$409.74K | ▼ -245.5% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | CA$1.13 Million | CA$2.65 Million | ▲ +282.3% |
| 2010 | -0.23x | CA$-224.54K | CA$963.24K | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2009 | -8.55x | CA$-2.93 Million | CA$343.15K | ▼ -4861.0% |
| 2008 | -0.17x | CA$-156.56K | CA$908.42K | ▼ -1430.8% |
| 2007 | -0.01x | CA$-23.75K | CA$2.11 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2006 | -0.45x | CA$-934.34K | CA$2.08 Million | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2005 | -1.31x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -805.5% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | CA$-270.37K | CA$1.87 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2003 | -0.36x | CA$-343.50K | CA$954.28K | ▼ -155.2% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | CA$-135.95K | CA$964.07K | ▲ +96.3% |
| 2001 | -3.86x | CA$-151.09K | CA$39.14K | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2000 | -11.40x | CA$-117.54K | CA$10.31K | ▼ -371.1% |
| 1999 | -2.42x | CA$-302.70K | CA$125.07K | ▼ -286.7% |
| 1998 | -0.63x | CA$-31.34K | CA$50.08K | ▼ -114.2% |
| 1997 | 4.40x | CA$29.86K | CA$6.79K | — |