FPX Nickel Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
FPX Nickel Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. FPX Nickel Corp (FPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.18x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-801.46K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.58 Million) in one year. Check FPX Nickel Corp cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of FPX Nickel Corp (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of FPX Nickel Corp from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for FPX Nickel Corp across 29 annual periods. Check FPX Nickel Corp investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
FPX Nickel Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
FPX Nickel Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for FPX Nickel Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FPX operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.45x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$4.21 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2023 | -0.85x | CA$-1.97 Million | CA$2.33 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2022 | -4.48x | CA$-3.22 Million | CA$718.43K | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2021 | -2.41x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$690.88K | ▼ -1232.4% |
| 2020 | -0.18x | CA$-659.66K | CA$3.65 Million | ▼ -113.0% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-697.69K | CA$8.22 Million | ▼ -183.9% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | CA$-240.50K | CA$8.04 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-486.60K | CA$7.09 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-906.98K | CA$7.40 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2015 | -0.16x | CA$-1.26 Million | CA$7.74 Million | ▲ +99.3% |
| 2014 | -22.85x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$46.27K | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2013 | -23.63x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$64.75K | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2012 | -18.85x | CA$-2.53 Million | CA$134.39K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2011 | -36.20x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$52.22K | ▼ -327.8% |
| 2010 | -8.46x | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$136.42K | ▼ -157.7% |
| 2009 | -3.28x | CA$-324.65K | CA$98.87K | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2008 | -4.00x | CA$-313.96K | CA$78.54K | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2007 | -8.02x | CA$-459.70K | CA$57.32K | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2006 | -8.21x | CA$-493.59K | CA$60.16K | ▼ -372.4% |
| 2005 | -1.74x | CA$-208.73K | CA$120.18K | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2004 | -19.26x | CA$-693.55K | CA$36.01K | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2003 | -31.32x | CA$-525.66K | CA$16.78K | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2002 | -77.22x | CA$-548.01K | CA$7.10K | ▼ -6284.7% |
| 2001 | -1.21x | CA$-121.64K | CA$100.58K | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2000 | -3.33x | CA$-245.76K | CA$73.70K | ▲ +66.2% |
| 1999 | -9.87x | CA$-265.88K | CA$26.93K | ▲ +67.4% |
| 1998 | -30.28x | CA$-422.10K | CA$13.94K | ▼ -22.5% |
| 1997 | -24.73x | CA$-713.50K | CA$28.85K | ▼ -2214.8% |
| 1996 | -1.07x | CA$-155.04K | CA$145.13K | — |