FPX Nickel Corp (FPX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
FPX Nickel Corp (FPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.18x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-801.46K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.58 Million) in one year. See FPX free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
FPX Nickel Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for FPX Nickel Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore FPX shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for FPX Nickel Corp (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for FPX Nickel Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FPX Nickel Corp (FPX) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.45x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$4.21 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2023 | -0.85x | CA$-1.97 Million | CA$2.33 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2022 | -4.48x | CA$-3.22 Million | CA$718.43K | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2021 | -2.41x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$690.88K | ▼ -1232.4% |
| 2020 | -0.18x | CA$-659.66K | CA$3.65 Million | ▼ -113.0% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-697.69K | CA$8.22 Million | ▼ -183.9% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | CA$-240.50K | CA$8.04 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-486.60K | CA$7.09 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-906.98K | CA$7.40 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2015 | -0.16x | CA$-1.26 Million | CA$7.74 Million | ▲ +99.3% |
| 2014 | -22.85x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$46.27K | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2013 | -23.63x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$64.75K | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2012 | -18.85x | CA$-2.53 Million | CA$134.39K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2011 | -36.20x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$52.22K | ▼ -327.8% |
| 2010 | -8.46x | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$136.42K | ▼ -157.7% |
| 2009 | -3.28x | CA$-324.65K | CA$98.87K | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2008 | -4.00x | CA$-313.96K | CA$78.54K | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2007 | -8.02x | CA$-459.70K | CA$57.32K | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2006 | -8.21x | CA$-493.59K | CA$60.16K | ▼ -372.4% |
| 2005 | -1.74x | CA$-208.73K | CA$120.18K | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2004 | -19.26x | CA$-693.55K | CA$36.01K | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2003 | -31.32x | CA$-525.66K | CA$16.78K | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2002 | -77.22x | CA$-548.01K | CA$7.10K | ▼ -6284.7% |
| 2001 | -1.21x | CA$-121.64K | CA$100.58K | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2000 | -3.33x | CA$-245.76K | CA$73.70K | ▲ +66.2% |
| 1999 | -9.87x | CA$-265.88K | CA$26.93K | ▲ +67.4% |
| 1998 | -30.28x | CA$-422.10K | CA$13.94K | ▼ -22.5% |
| 1997 | -24.73x | CA$-713.50K | CA$28.85K | ▼ -2214.8% |
| 1996 | -1.07x | CA$-155.04K | CA$145.13K | — |