FPX Nickel Corp (FPX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
FPX Nickel Corp (FPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.18x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-801.46K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.58 Million) in one year. See FPX Nickel Corp free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
FPX Nickel Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for FPX Nickel Corp across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FPX Nickel Corp cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for FPX Nickel Corp (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for FPX Nickel Corp. Check FPX cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.45x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$4.21 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2023 | -0.85x | CA$-1.97 Million | CA$2.33 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2022 | -4.48x | CA$-3.22 Million | CA$718.43K | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2021 | -2.41x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$690.88K | ▼ -1232.4% |
| 2020 | -0.18x | CA$-659.66K | CA$3.65 Million | ▼ -113.0% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-697.69K | CA$8.22 Million | ▼ -183.9% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | CA$-240.50K | CA$8.04 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-486.60K | CA$7.09 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-906.98K | CA$7.40 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2015 | -0.16x | CA$-1.26 Million | CA$7.74 Million | ▲ +99.3% |
| 2014 | -22.85x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$46.27K | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2013 | -23.63x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$64.75K | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2012 | -18.85x | CA$-2.53 Million | CA$134.39K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2011 | -36.20x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$52.22K | ▼ -327.8% |
| 2010 | -8.46x | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$136.42K | ▼ -157.7% |
| 2009 | -3.28x | CA$-324.65K | CA$98.87K | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2008 | -4.00x | CA$-313.96K | CA$78.54K | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2007 | -8.02x | CA$-459.70K | CA$57.32K | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2006 | -8.21x | CA$-493.59K | CA$60.16K | ▼ -372.4% |
| 2005 | -1.74x | CA$-208.73K | CA$120.18K | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2004 | -19.26x | CA$-693.55K | CA$36.01K | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2003 | -31.32x | CA$-525.66K | CA$16.78K | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2002 | -77.22x | CA$-548.01K | CA$7.10K | ▼ -6284.7% |
| 2001 | -1.21x | CA$-121.64K | CA$100.58K | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2000 | -3.33x | CA$-245.76K | CA$73.70K | ▲ +66.2% |
| 1999 | -9.87x | CA$-265.88K | CA$26.93K | ▲ +67.4% |
| 1998 | -30.28x | CA$-422.10K | CA$13.94K | ▼ -22.5% |
| 1997 | -24.73x | CA$-713.50K | CA$28.85K | ▼ -2214.8% |
| 1996 | -1.07x | CA$-155.04K | CA$145.13K | — |