Glen Eagle Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Glen Eagle Resources Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Glen Eagle Resources Inc (GER) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of September 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-292.64K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.08 Million) in one year. Check GER cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Glen Eagle Resources Inc (2001–2022)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Glen Eagle Resources Inc from 2001 to 2022. Historical debt coverage capacity for Glen Eagle Resources Inc across 22 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Glen Eagle Resources Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Glen Eagle Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2022)
Glen Eagle Resources Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2022. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Glen Eagle Resources Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GER cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -0.50x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$3.82 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 2021 | -0.91x | CA$-2.16 Million | CA$2.37 Million | ▼ -165.5% |
| 2020 | -0.34x | CA$-772.28K | CA$2.24 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2019 | -0.25x | CA$-467.94K | CA$1.87 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2018 | -0.17x | CA$-208.96K | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +86.3% |
| 2017 | -1.27x | CA$-982.81K | CA$771.06K | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2016 | -1.48x | CA$-824.45K | CA$556.23K | ▼ -468.0% |
| 2015 | -0.26x | CA$-498.48K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +87.3% |
| 2014 | -2.06x | CA$-914.30K | CA$443.97K | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2013 | -3.46x | CA$-677.43K | CA$196.06K | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2012 | -2.57x | CA$-479.61K | CA$186.92K | ▼ -165.5% |
| 2011 | -0.97x | CA$-674.84K | CA$698.32K | ▼ -145.7% |
| 2010 | 2.11x | CA$186.05K | CA$87.99K | ▲ +196.7% |
| 2009 | -2.19x | CA$-414.57K | CA$189.69K | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2008 | -4.84x | CA$-240.67K | CA$49.68K | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2007 | -5.86x | CA$-219.94K | CA$37.50K | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2006 | -8.49x | CA$-223.97K | CA$26.38K | ▼ -286.9% |
| 2005 | -2.19x | CA$-165.77K | CA$75.54K | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2004 | -2.74x | CA$-628.18K | CA$229.00K | ▼ -724.0% |
| 2003 | -0.33x | CA$-229.59K | CA$689.63K | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2002 | -0.18x | CA$-141.67K | CA$805.71K | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2001 | -0.36x | CA$-152.81K | CA$420.25K | — |