Graphite One Inc (GPH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -1.15x

Graphite One Inc (GPH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.15x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-4.23 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$3.66 Million) in one year. See GPH FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-1.15x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CA$-4.23 Million
CAD

Total Liabilities

CA$3.66 Million
CAD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Graphite One Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Graphite One Inc across 20 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Graphite One Inc cash flow conversion.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Graphite One Inc (2007–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Graphite One Inc.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CAD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -2.27x CA$-8.33 Million CA$3.66 Million ▼ -202.9%
2024 -0.75x CA$-3.65 Million CA$4.86 Million ▲ +44.9%
2023 -1.36x CA$-3.55 Million CA$2.60 Million ▼ -89.9%
2022 -0.72x CA$-3.35 Million CA$4.68 Million ▼ -56.4%
2021 -0.46x CA$-3.25 Million CA$7.09 Million ▼ -374.5%
2020 -0.10x CA$-690.53K CA$7.14 Million ▲ +67.9%
2019 -0.30x CA$-1.08 Million CA$3.58 Million ▲ +85.8%
2018 -2.13x CA$-1.18 Million CA$552.90K ▲ +6.0%
2017 -2.26x CA$-856.21K CA$378.51K ▲ +66.5%
2016 -6.75x CA$-2.01 Million CA$297.55K ▼ -58.7%
2016 -4.25x CA$-1.63 Million CA$382.45K ▼ -129.5%
2015 -1.85x CA$-1.11 Million CA$600.76K ▲ +44.9%
2014 -3.37x CA$-1.79 Million CA$531.61K ▼ -63.5%
2013 -2.06x CA$-974.09K CA$473.36K ▲ +31.1%
2012 -2.99x CA$-964.64K CA$323.05K ▼ -29.9%
2011 -2.30x CA$-795.32K CA$346.08K ▼ -1.3%
2010 -2.27x CA$-549.12K CA$242.13K ▼ -53.2%
2009 -1.48x CA$-424.24K CA$286.51K ▲ +84.9%
2008 -9.80x CA$-469.24K CA$47.87K ▼ -2625.9%
2007 -0.36x CA$-53.59K CA$149.02K
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.